-
Message Boards

Movie Soundtracks
3:10 To Yuma (Page 1)
Archive of old forum. No more postings.
Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.
This topic is 2 pages long: 1 2Author
Topic: 3:10 To Yuma

sean

Standard Userer

We just got a bunch of semi-cool looking posters at my work for 3:10 To Yuma and it lists Marco Beltrami for the score! Looks to be a good opportunity for a good/maybe great score from him. Is there any release date for a score to this?
posted 08-25-2007 10:18 PM PT (US) 
HadrianD

Standard Userer

The movie looks really interesting. It'd be great to hear some sort of western scoring being used. Perhaps something similar to what Jerry Goldsmith used to do.
posted 08-26-2007 02:05 AM PT (US) 
sean

Standard Userer

I agree. Goldsmith's Take A Hard Ride is my favourite western score, so it'd be nice to hear something along those lines ... Somehow I imagine Beltrami will resist the "western" sound for the most part and go for darker material, but hopefully it's the other way around.
posted 08-26-2007 02:30 AM PT (US) 
joan hue

Standard Userer

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/33721If you scroll down the above URL, he mentions the music. I'd love it to sound like a Goldsmith thematic western.
posted 08-26-2007 10:03 AM PT (US) 
sean

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by joan hue:
If you scroll down the above URL, he mentions the music. I'd love it to sound like a Goldsmith thematic western.O.K., now even more excited! AICN is hard to swallow sometimes, but the music comments are damn promising.
posted 08-26-2007 10:50 AM PT (US) 
La La Land Records

Standard Userer

I have been told that a score release is forthcoming. It's late due to the release date change of the film from Nov to sept. Expect a release from Lions Gate Music in october.Can't wait to see the film and hear the score. Hopefully this will be the movie to bring the western back to life again.
MV
posted 08-26-2007 12:19 PM PT (US) 
Bond1965

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by La La Land Records:
I have been told that a score release is forthcoming. It's late due to the release date change of the film from Nov to sept. Expect a release from Lions Gate Music in october.Can't wait to see the film and hear the score. Hopefully this will be the movie to bring the western back to life again.
MV
Will this be an iTunes download only release or will we have an actual CD?
James
posted 08-26-2007 12:39 PM PT (US) 
Hondo
Non-Standard Userer

I just read a second review of the the film on AICN that mentioned the score. This is highly unusual even for AICN. It's been a while since we've had a satisfying western score...dare I start to hope?
posted 08-26-2007 01:50 PM PT (US) 
John C Winfrey

Standard Userer

All the comments on the music and references to Goldsmith are interesting. The other day I realized how much I looked forward to each of his new scores.On the film, its like many from Hollywood and the film industry today, they lack the good new scripts and ideas so they keep falling back and doing remakes. The first 3:10 will be hard to beat with Van Heflin and Glenn Ford and the score by Duning was good too. Its either a poor remake or many dumb sequels, i/e/ the latest Rambo junk.
J.
posted 08-26-2007 03:38 PM PT (US) 
Demetris Christodoulides

Standard Userer

MARCO BELTRAMI | 3:10 TO YUMASOUND CLIPS in the official website of the movie, under the 'soundtrack' tag http://310toyumathefilm.com/
posted 08-30-2007 03:00 AM PT (US) 
Hondo
Non-Standard Userer

As I write this I am listening to the sound clips from the score. All I can say is....WOW! Sounds like Goldsmith meets Morricone. I am really excited about this one. The second track, 'Ben Takes the Stage' is really good....
posted 08-30-2007 12:57 PM PT (US) 
Demetris Christodoulides

Standard Userer

You can listen to one more cue in Marco Beltrami's my space page.
http://www.myspace.com/officialmarcobeltrami
posted 08-31-2007 07:35 AM PT (US) 
sean

Standard Userer

WOW! Wicked score! Is there a release date for this?
posted 08-31-2007 01:28 PM PT (US) 
Hondo
Non-Standard Userer

Harry over at AICN just wrote in his review-"In 3:10 TO YUMA – you have a western score that makes you want to throw away the keys to your gas-guzzler and mount up"....the torture continues...[Message edited by Hondo on 09-04-2007]
posted 09-04-2007 04:01 PM PT (US) 
nuts_score

Standard Userer

Hahaha, thus Harry Knowles continues his long streak of being a hypocrit. Not just last year Harry was shouting from the rooftops about how much he loathed Marco Beltrami's music in The Omen remake and his music in general. I seem to remember the words, "sounds a lot like noise", from his comments. Now it seems he'll gobble his other words up in favor of Beltrami. Sorry, Harry, I'll take Marco anyway he comes; his music is great and he'll be around a lot longer than that geek ever will be.
posted 09-04-2007 10:47 PM PT (US) 
Hondo
Non-Standard Userer

I just purchased the score on Itunes for $9.99...It says that it was released on 09/04...Can't wait to jump in...
posted 09-05-2007 06:19 AM PT (US) 
Shaun Rutherford

Standard Userer

The clips on the net are pretty good, for Beltrami.
posted 09-05-2007 11:59 AM PT (US) 
sean

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by Shaun Rutherford:
The clips on the net are pretty good, for Beltrami.HAHA! You gonna' take that, nuts? (He reckons it's the BEST score of the week.)
posted 09-05-2007 12:43 PM PT (US) 
nuts_score

Standard Userer

[quoteOriginally posted by Shaun Rutherford:
The clips on the net are pretty good, for Beltrami.[/quote]
quote:
Originally posted by sean:
HAHA! You gonna' take that, nuts? (He reckons it's the BEST score of the week.)To answer the question, Sean, not lightly. In fact, I'm holding off on a full blown Sean-like tirade in favor of a peaceful discussion on Beltrami (there's been too many derogatory pundits about these boards as of recent). And, like my other heroes Howard Shore, Elliot Goldenthal, and Ennio Morricone, I'll politely offer the fact that Beltrami's music isn't for everyone. That said - contrary to my own belief that I'm probably wrong in this assumption - have you ever heard anything Marco Beltrami's written, Shaun? Sure, one might push him aside as a simple Genre-ready composer, but forget not that Maestro Goldsmith might once have been considered this as well. Sure, we've heard enormous amounts of Goldsmith music and loved nearly every bit of it; but have you seen even 30% of the films he's scored? Did you enjoy said films? No? Chances are you loved the scores. The same could easily be said for Beltrami. He's scored some tremendous duds in his small, yet prolific career, but nearly all of his scores deliver upon a unique sound and style. Sound a bit like Jerry?
NP> Shore's eXistenZ (*****/*****)[Message edited by nuts_score on 09-05-2007]
posted 09-05-2007 06:02 PM PT (US) 
nuts_score

Standard Userer

Peter,Ugh, I hate editing posts with quotes in them! Whatever happened to the updates you're always teasing about?
posted 09-05-2007 06:05 PM PT (US) 
scoreguy16

Standard Userer

I have to agree with Nuts here, Beltrami hasn't written a score I haven't liked. Though my favorite is still Scream, I'll pretty much listen to anything he's written.Clayton
posted 09-05-2007 06:19 PM PT (US) 
nuts_score

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by scoreguy16:
I have to agree with Nuts here, Beltrami hasn't written a score I haven't liked. Though my favorite is still Scream, I'll pretty much listen to anything he's written.Clayton
What's funny is that your first Beltrami usually remains your favorite. Granted, he's done more complex and larger work than Blade II, yet I absolutely adore that score. It's phenominal!
posted 09-05-2007 07:44 PM PT (US) 
scoreguy16

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by nuts_score:
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=1 face=arial>quote:</font><HR size=1>Originally posted by scoreguy16:
[b]I have to agree with Nuts here, Beltrami hasn't written a score I haven't liked. Though my favorite is still Scream, I'll pretty much listen to anything he's written.Clayton<HR size=1></BLOCKQUOTE>
What's funny is that your first Beltrami usually remains your favorite. Granted, he's done more complex and larger work than Blade II, yet I absolutely adore that score. It's phenominal![/B]
I know! I don't know what it is about the score to Scream, but I absolutely love it. I think it's the way the sound design is with it, mixed with his (this is weird to say for a movie like Scream) emotional themes. Especially the track for Dew Barrymore's opening... Very effective, mostly the last 2 minutes of it and the little tribute to the theme from Halloween in there... Good stuff!
Clayton
posted 09-05-2007 08:31 PM PT (US) 
scoreguy16

Standard Userer

Oh, and the opening from Scream 2... and Scream 3... They're just so huge and dramatic they rule!Clayton
NP>Scream 2 (Imagine that!)
posted 09-05-2007 08:34 PM PT (US) 
Dinko

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by nuts_score:
Sure, one might push him aside as a simple Genre-ready composer, but forget not that Maestro Goldsmith might once have been considered this as well. Sure, we've heard enormous amounts of Goldsmith music and loved nearly every bit of it; but have you seen even 30% of the films he's scored? Did you enjoy said films? No? Chances are you loved the scores. The same could easily be said for Beltrami. He's scored some tremendous duds in his small, yet prolific career, but nearly all of his scores deliver upon a unique sound and style. Sound a bit like Jerry?I'm not sure that parallels between their careers make much sense here. Whether they write for duds or hits... who cares when it's the music you're discussing. If you want to compare Goldsmith and Beltrami, then you mostly end up doing Beltrami a disservice. Take Hollow Man as an example. Had Beltrami scored that, he would have produced a first rate theme, then blanketted the rest of the movie with dissonant noise which you could easily have tracked from just about any other Beltrami horror score. Goldsmith at least produced something more than randomly generated unpleasant sounds.
Let me put it differently: Beltrami has a vast amount of talent; he can be extremely original; he can write fantastic tunes/themes which are both expressive and memorable; he can successfully write for just about every possible genre... yet he has that tendency to just go in slasher mode to just fill the gaps. Whether it's because he lacks time, lacks interest in a scene or just because he thinks it works with the movie, the end result in many Beltrami compositions is a 90-minute score of which barely 5-10 minutes are worth hearing (if even that much).
posted 09-05-2007 08:37 PM PT (US) 
scoreguy16

Standard Userer

Stupid Beltrami! Writing appropriate music for a scene! God! What is wrong with him?! And he calls himself a film score composer even though some of his music might not be listenable outside of the film by some people... what a hack...Seriously though, if I were any more sarcastic the internet would've broke.
Clayton
posted 09-05-2007 08:59 PM PT (US) 
sean

Standard Userer

I kinda' agree with nuts, but I also kinda' agree with Dinko here. Beltrami is a real hit or miss with me: I listened to Live Free Or Die Hard again today, and thought there was way too much throw-away material to this score: The first 2 tracks are absolutely great (except his electronics were unnecessary), but other than that it's hard to stay for the entire album. The Omen is a fun listen and in good keeping with Goldsmith's original, but the 2 scores/composers cannot be compared, Goldsmith outclasses Beltrami at every turn, hands-down-no-questions-asked. nuts, I would argue that it doesn't matter what films Beltrami and Goldsmith are scoring, good or bad, it's just a bad comparison all around, Goldsmith is the best and there's nothing else to add to that, Beltrami doesn't compare. If it's the films you're interested in, than Goldsmith, Beltrami, Zimmer, Williams, Horner etc. ALL have made a career out of some ridiculous and stupid movies; there are some good ones, yes, but the majority are pretty retarted.
posted 09-05-2007 10:24 PM PT (US) 
nuts_score

Standard Userer

Okay, I'm not exactly calling Beltrami from the Heavens and declaring him as better than Goldsmith, or even the next Goldsmith (he's done a well enough job of keeping his material original, while still paying resepect to his tutor) but I'm simply stating that Beltrami appeals to me; even his lower-end "filler" music. Sure, there are moments in I, Robot and certainly Live Free of Die Hard which can easily be skipped over to get to the next big cue, but I never due. In fact, Beltrami is one of the few composers where I do listen all the way through. Dinko brings up his "filler" music as being slasher-esque. BUt what about The Three Buriels of Melquiades Estrada and I Am Dina, those two albums are certainly filled with very little slasher influence; in fact, outside of The Omen, Beltrami has been keeping a steady pace ahead of the horror genre, in favor of bigger projects in the sci-fi, action, and western genres. Which certainly couldn't be said for Christopher Young, an equally talented composer who can't help but be stuck in the horror genre. Even in the liner notes for The Fly 2, Young notes about how he was worried about being the "horror guy" and here he is, in 2007 and he's still considered that guy outside of his very small work on more prestigious pictures (and his treatment on Spider-Man 3 will not be discussed but good luck to any composer who has to score Sam Raimi's next movie). Underworld: Evolution is by far and long a text book example of Beltrami including filler music, but for God's sake, have you seen the movie? How else do you compose for endless scenes of needless exposition? The only thing I question is Sean's inclusion of the "filler" music in The Omen; now granted, it's no where near as great as Jerry's album, but I find it to be one of his more satisfying listening experiences to date. The same will ring true for 3:10 to Yuma. So, take his duty to fill long and boring scenes with "filler" music as an ample hint that guy needs better product for his talent.
posted 09-05-2007 11:31 PM PT (US) 
sean

Standard Userer

Now, now: I didn't write that The Omen had "filler" music, I think it's a solid listen/album. I have to say, though, I was a bit disappointed while watching the awful Captivity this summer and hearing the same signature piano pedal motif from Omen in this score: At first I just thought it was knock-off by someone else, but the end credits said Marco Beltrami had done the score; perhaps he was specifically asked to repeat that motif, but it was still troubling and unimaginative to hear it in another horror score of his--it was specific to his Omen music for me (like the signature of that score), so it'd be something like John Williams using his 2-note Jaws theme for another horror movie (not that Beltrami's piece is anywhere as good, but you catch my drift).[Message edited by sean on 09-06-2007]
posted 09-06-2007 06:51 AM PT (US) 
Hondo
Non-Standard Userer

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, I saw the early show of 3:10...What a good movie. Everything from the story to the actors to the music was top notch. For those who might be interested, the music fit the mood of the movie very well. The music seemed to be paying homage to Morricone, but not in a distracting way. The movie is brutal and dusty and dirty, just like the score. When the score fits the movie like a glove, what more can you ask for?
posted 09-07-2007 02:14 PM PT (US) 
joan hue

Standard Userer

While I did see some flaws in this movie, overall, I was VERY
impressed. Great cinematography and gorgeous wide-open spaces.
If you want to see this movie, see it on a big screen in a theater.The acting is superb. Crowe makes a fine villain. Some of the
minor characters are fleshed out enough that you care about them.
I especially enjoyed the return of Peter Fonda. Ben Foster will
soon earn the moniker of the world's best psychopath. I think he
is becoming a caricature of himself. The most amazing performance,
Oscar worthy, comes from Christian Bale. He just keeps growing as
an excellent actor. The geometry of his face is all carved planes of
personal pain.The movie has a bang-up opening and a rousing finale, but mainly it
is a character-driven movie. If you are only into relentless action, you
may find this movie rather slow. I loved watching the actors reveal
new layers of themselves. I thought the themes of varying degrees of
good and evil, personal redemption, and the discovery of courage in
the face of hopelessness, were well-developed. There are surprises
in this movie that are different from the original movie.I really wanted a better score for this movie. Ain't It Cool News kept mentioning
a rousing western score. Where? Some Morriconeish twangy guitars
with a tossed in trumpet isn't all that rousing for me. If you want to really
hear the two main themes which are IMHO just okay, stay for the
end credits. To me the movie used a minimalist approach in the scoring.I, of course, wanted the rousing approach of an Alfred Newman, Goldsmith,
Moross, Bernstein, Morricone, or for a current update, a Broughton or
JN Howard.Still, the movie emotionally resonated with me, and I hope it will
resurrect the western genre in Hollywood."The western in its glory days was often a morality play, a story about
humanist values penetrating the lawless anarchy of the frontier."
From Roger Ebertposted 09-07-2007 11:44 PM PT (US) 
sean

Standard Userer

I'll dissent here about the movie. Yes, there are some wide-open vista shots and there is nothing wrong with the performances. BUT, I found Bale's plight, unexplained until the very end of the film, to be too loose to feel a REAL emotional connection to after the film. And so much of the plot involved a heavy amount of Crowe's cooperation as captive to defeat/overcome various obstacles that it was a bit far-fetched at times (I know ALL movies are FANTASY/DREAMS, but it was pushin' it a little too much, IMO). I started to seriously enjoy it near the end, where Bale and Crowe must make it to the train through a hail of gunfire; that was enjoyable. Shaking the camera, though, still does not do anything dramatic for me (no matter how prevalent it is; I'm still hoping it was just a one-off in Batman Begins and will not persist into Dark Knight), so there were points lost for style during the action scenes. It didn't bring back the Western, I think, for mainstream audiences ... The weekend box-office, I'm sure, will tell (week 2 will be more important, since the initial curiosity will have died down by then).Beltrami's music was fine, but of course was mixed too low much of the time to make any serious impact other than the main title and the end action sequence. And the piece from the score, "Ben Takes The Stage / Dan's Burden," I'm certain was not included in the film, as I looked forward to how this piece might play out on-screen for the entire film, but nothing came of it. It's an incredibly fun/cool piece of music and it's a shame it wasn't exploited to it's fullest potential anywhere in the film.
To nuts: I know you're the relentless apologist for Marco Beltrami, but this score is nowhere near as cool as it could have been, seriously, without the inclusion of said piece in the film.
The score is more of a homage to Morricone than it is to any other composer steeped in Western scoring and does a nice job of it. Zimmer did a good job doing just that for a piece on Pirates 3 and Beltrami does a good job here, too; Morricone deserves these classy tributes for sure.
[Message edited by sean on 09-08-2007]
posted 09-08-2007 12:47 AM PT (US) 
joan hue

Standard Userer

I don't mind dissent.
I too think some of the score was mixed way too low, and I also thought some of the music clips heard on the websites were not used in this movie. Like Sean, I wanted to hear that music.
posted 09-08-2007 07:33 AM PT (US) 
nuts_score

Standard Userer

I’ll dissent too (this implies spoilers hereon out).I wanted to love, love, love this film; but ultimately, this is a good movie draped in a great movie’s clothing. And it all comes down to the script and direction. First, I’ll discuss the performances, which will lead into how disappointed I was with the direction. Bale and Crowe both turned in greatly admirable performances, and neither felt as though it encapsulates the other (a bit like DeNiro and Pacino in Heat, which I will compare this film to more in this review). Crowe’s Ben Wade is a wonderful screen villain; one that scowls while seeming to charm you endlessly. Respectively, Bale’s Dan Evans is a wonderfully conflicted hero; Bale presents his role as a sort of tortured soul, and it’s a no-brainer that he’s out to gain the respect of his family. But this three-dimension aspect of the main roles comes solely from the actors, who are working far and above what the material implies. This said, the direction can’t keep up with the acting; not in the least. Even Ben Foster, in a role similar to Val Kilmer’s in Heat, really fires his role on all cylinders. His character is a violent, obsessive sociopath; a hero-worshiper who doesn’t know any better. I was very pleased with his exit in the film. Hell, even Peter Fonda, usually such a mediocre presence, gives his character a lot to say (the script, however, doesn’t). And it’s a damn shame that Alan Tudyk has to be the guy who dies doing something heroic again; or, when will this guy get a break? But director James Mangold can’t shake being terribly mediocre (a crime he committed almost offensively in Walk the Line) and has absolutely no style; he can call nothing of this movie his own, because it’s all been done before (remarkably recent in Open Range). Sean’s right, the handheld “shaky-cam” approach to the Western genre is a step in the wrong direction; which is why I’m looking so forward to The Assassination of Jesse James. I’m not deploring handheld camera work at all - some of my favorites, from Werner Herzog to Christoper Nolan (and even Paul Greengrass’ effective use of it in United 93) - but some director’s think “shaky” means frenzied. The only thing that’s frenzied is the audiences head. His takes run short and his vistas aren’t expansive enough (however, there were a few really great shots, especially towards the end). In short, this film could’ve been amazing in a more capable director’s hand (like Michael Mann!).
Beltrami’s score, as has been said, is mixed terribly too low. On its own, the score is ball-bustingly amazing; definitely one of my favorite Beltrami scores. I see where Joan is coming from, because it seems that a fews cues were cut from the final picture (as Sean’s notes); but Joan, baby, I know you’re a Morricone fan like the best of us (me) but give Beltrami a little space. It should also be noted that Beltrami’s score isn’t a direct rip-off of anything Morricone has done in the Western genre, he’s using the same scoring and instrumental techniques but the style is very Beltrami. This score delivers, and I think you’ll enjoy it when it comes to album.
So, yes, I guess I am a Beltrami apologist.

NP> Jerry Goldsmith's The 'Burbs (****/*****)[Message edited by nuts_score on 09-08-2007]
posted 09-08-2007 11:03 AM PT (US) 
joan hue

Standard Userer

Well nuts score, I doubt if I'll really enjoy the CD as I won't buy it based upon what I heard in the movie. Parts of the score worked for me, but I wasn't all that impressed...and I stayed through the end credits. Looks like you did like most of the movie except the direction. I felt that the plot had holes. Crowe could have escaped fairly easily in my opinion.I have a question for some of you to ponder. Nuts Score didn't care for the director. I wonder about this idea. Did we get such amazing, uber-amazing performances because the actors were so solid and talented? Or did the director demand, direct, and elicit such amazing performances? I can't really answer those questions.
posted 09-08-2007 01:20 PM PT (US) 
nuts_score

Standard Userer

Well, I guess I can't force you to buy the score.In the case of the direction and the acting, the primary reason I think these actors signed on and illicited such amazing charisma on screen is a rare occurance of them wanting to get deeper into the sociopath of these characters. I don't think Mangold understood what these characters were capable of, in the slightest. This brings up a few things I forgot to mentionin my earlier review. One of them being the duality of Ben Wade. I had this wild assumption, from the first frame of the picture, that's Crowe's Ben Wade was willing to give it all up. The career as a notorious gunslinger, the leader of such a dangerous group of heartless thieves and low-lifes; he was done. THIS is the sole reason why he allowed himself to be caught (which happens rather idiotically for a character so revered) and allowed him to be caught again and again. I saw a longing for a different life in Crowe's eyes, and when he encountered the woman from his past at the saloon, he gave us many hints as to what his future plans be (moving to Mexico, settling down, even his small sketchings hinted at a life greater and more fulfilling than his current one). But in the case of Wade's first escape, after he was caught by an oddly cameoed Luke Wilson, he realized that escaping would put him into further debt with the lawmen of the area. He was thuroughly excited when Bale and crew came back to the mining community in search of him; and he had no resistence in his re-arrest. I don't think Mangold got this hint however, because he's still desperately trying to tell the audience too much. The old show not tell technique; something Mangold must've forgotten in his schooling. The entire film, we're told these things about these characters (yes Joan, I did notice many plot holes, and they are here) - especially the fact that Wade's gun, dully named "The Hand of God" (WTF?), is cursed. Yet the man who steals Crowe's gun has a fairly predictable death, and the curse or what might happen if that gun was in the wrong hands wasn't conveyed (on any character who came in contact with it, including Luke Wilson). In the final firefight, what happened to Dan Evans gimp leg that he lost? Was it restored, because he certainly did haul ass as though he'd been a high school track star. I was surprised that that little hole passed across even Bale's thinking man's approach to Method acting. This is why Mangold's direction failed: he wasn't listening to his actors, and he didn't seem to notice his characters' weaknesses. I come back to my old review, in saying that Michael Mann would have been absolutely perfect for this film; but I'm complacent with the film we have here.
posted 09-08-2007 05:35 PM PT (US) 
Al

Standard Userer

I didn't have much of a problem with plot holes, especially when the screenplay gets an amazing amount of things right: there's always a clear line of action, but always a solid character moment nestled in there. The mystery of Bale's and Crowe's past are set up and smoothly unveiled. The significance of the 200 dollars was unexpected in a good way. The set-up and payoff of Bale's wife's broach. Man, I could go on.Do we really need to argue about whether or not Crowe could have gotten away earlier? I suppose he could have. Then of course there would be no movie. And honestly he does pull it off that once and comes close a few times before. For all the film does well story-wise I'm willing to give it just a little suspension of disbelief, being that it's a melodrama and not a bio pic.
I was afraid Beltrami's score was just gonna sit on the sidelines much like his Three Burials score, but it did gather momentum as the story moved on, coming to the forefront toward the end. It was like he was actually building the score up through the film, giving it a sense of progression, which is something that is sort of lacking in recent film scores. Either it's completely in your face from opening to close or usually it's barely a presence at all. It wasn't thematically outstanding, but it wasn't mediocre by any means. You could certainly hear his signature voice throughout. For there being little thematic material, that's quite an achievement isn't it? Especially when we have other composers who throw in a full choir and orchestra and still manage to sound like everyone else and yet no one at all.
[Message edited by Al on 09-08-2007]
posted 09-08-2007 11:12 PM PT (US) 
Hondo
Non-Standard Userer

The full orchestra "Hollywood" score would not have fit this film. I felt that this film was about the Dan trying to win back his self respect and that of his son. The score needed to be intimate. I also agree that the score was building to the finale. That was one of my favorite things about Goldsmith. He built his music in layers until you got the full force at the end. Listen to the cut "Bible Study" and you will understand what I mean. I for one love "The Magnificent Seven" and "Silverado" style scores. But this one is also good because it complements this style of movie.[Message edited by Hondo on 09-09-2007]
posted 09-09-2007 05:02 AM PT (US) 
sean

Standard Userer

nuts, I agree with you all the way, except I don't think Michael Mann could have helped: Do you want it looking like Miami Vice? (And nothing against that film, but Miami Vice only looks good for Miami Vice.) He'd have shot the whole thing digitally ("'cause you can see more grains of sand that way!" haha) and that would not have been a pretty sight. I know what you're saying about his direction, though ... his calibre is much higher than Mangold's at the helm.
posted 09-09-2007 10:55 AM PT (US) 
nuts_score

Standard Userer

Of course, I mean Michael Mann should've directed this film right after Heat!
posted 09-09-2007 09:04 PM PT (US) Old Infopop Software by UBB
