The MovieMusic Store shopping cart   |  sign in
    SEARCH  
  • Home
  • Browse Store
    • New Soundtrack CDs
    • Top Sellers
    • Low Price New CDs
    • Used CDs
    • Soundtrack Compilations
    • Score Composers
    • Soundtrack Labels
    • Soundtracks by Year
    • ... detailed search page
  • Store Info
    • Happy Customers!
    • $1 Shipping
    • Accepted Payment Methods
    • Safe Shopping Guarantee
    • Shipping Rates & Policies
    • Our Privacy Policy
    • About Us
  • Help Center
    • My Account
    • How to Order
    • Search Tips
    • Return/Refund Policy
    • Cancelling Your Order
    • Contact the Store
  • The Lobby
  •   Message Boards
      Movie Soundtracks
      The Two Towers

    Archive of old forum. No more postings.

    Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.

    Author
    Topic:   The Two Towers

     Marselus
     Click Here to Email Marselus
     Romulan
     

    Well, after watching the movie, the only thing I can say, concerning to the music,is that it fits so well with the images that it seems impossible.In my opinion it fits even better than FOTR. Add to this fact the great photography, the almost perfect CGI for Gollum (oscar nomination for best CGI actor in a supporting role),the non stop rythm Jackson gives to the movie, the epic of many parts of the film (the battle in Helm is amazing), and you have a 9/10 motion picture (I´d give it a 10 if it wasn´t for the Légolas stairs descent a la Xander Cage in XXX ).
    Specially impressive about the score is the end of the Helm battle, in which we hear the Forth Eorlingas track: in moments like this is when people should realize how important is a score for a movie.

    NP You already know the answer.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-18-2002 09:46 AM PT (US)     

     Kevin
     Romulan
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by Marselus:
    (I´d give it a 10 if it wasn´t for the Légolas stairs descent a la Xander Cage in XXX ).

    But maybe it should be the other way around? I'm pretty sure that scene was filmed way before xXx was. And, it's been done before.


    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-18-2002 12:04 PM PT (US)     

     Quill
     Romulan
     

    Don't know if I can make it all the way to Saturday!!

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-18-2002 01:08 PM PT (US)     

     Swashbuckler
     Click Here to Email Swashbuckler
     Romulan
     

    Why wait?

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-18-2002 02:09 PM PT (US)     

     dgoldwas
     Click Here to Email dgoldwas
     Romulan
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by Marselus:
    (I´d give it a 10 if it wasn´t for the Légolas stairs descent a la Xander Cage in XXX ).

    Well... his horse-mounting maneuver should more than make up for any foibles you have with it.

    Dan

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-18-2002 02:16 PM PT (US)     

     Dan Brecher
     Click Here to Email Dan Brecher
     Romulan
     

    Took in two showings today. On the whole terrific stuff, many of its flaws I am sure will be ironed out in an extended cut (some things just need room to breathe) but the galadriel/elrond exposition seemed a bit of a waste.

    I liked the score's nods to themes heard in the extended cut of Fellowship, notably the new choir motif from the extended Amon Hen scene from Fellowship which wasnt heard in choir form here, but full orchestral. The cue never made the TT score CD, but as consolation I found it only one of a handful of REALLY great cues that didn't make the CD.

    Dan

    [Message edited by Dan Brecher on 12-18-2002]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-18-2002 03:16 PM PT (US)     

     dgoldwas
     Click Here to Email dgoldwas
     Romulan
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by Dan Brecher:
    Took in two showings today.

    Wow Dan, just a bit obsessive?

    Dan


    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-18-2002 03:30 PM PT (US)     

     Quill
     Romulan
     

    Well I promised my family we could see it together and work is keeping my from it during the week...curse it all!!!!

    Top that all off with Dan seeing it twice today...salt in the wounds!!!

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-18-2002 03:53 PM PT (US)     

     Dan Brecher
     Click Here to Email Dan Brecher
     Romulan
     

    I have tickets for a third viewing tomorrow. The other five or so will wait until after Christmas.

    Dan

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-18-2002 04:16 PM PT (US)     

     Swashbuckler
     Click Here to Email Swashbuckler
     Romulan
     

    Hey, folks, after you see the movie, if you wanna get down and dirty about the nuts and bolts of this brilliant score, come here, and chime in about how you think the trilogy score is coming. but only AFTER you've seen the film!

    Spoilers and stuff!

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-18-2002 07:30 PM PT (US)     

     Quill
     Romulan
     

    You're killing me Dan!!


    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-19-2002 07:17 AM PT (US)     

     Bond1965
     Click Here to Email Bond1965
     Romulan
     

    Well...I have NOT seen "The Two Towers" yet. By the time I see it, most of you guys will have gone 3 or 4 times.

    Those Tolkien freaks at the LACMA Shore event scared me from rushing out to see the film until it dies down a bit next week.

    "Adaptation," "Antwone Fisher," "Talk To Her," and "Ararat" are on my list for the weekend.

    James

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-19-2002 08:24 AM PT (US)     

     Marian Schedenig
     Click Here to Email Marian Schedenig
     Romulan
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by Dan Brecher:
    I liked the score's nods to themes heard in the extended cut of Fellowship, notably the new choir motif from the extended Amon Hen scene from Fellowship which wasnt heard in choir form here, but full orchestral.

    One of my favourite bits isn't on the CD either - when Shore combines the Uruk-hai rhythm with that choir motif (like he did in the extended FOTR) and then plays the Fellowship theme as a counterpoint to that. Magnificent!

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-19-2002 08:24 AM PT (US)     

     Crono/Kyp
     Click Here to Email Crono/Kyp
     Romulan
     

    I thought the film was amazing and I loved it. And I loved Sméagol! Damn! Jar-Jar and all other CG characters move over!

    Side note: I was 1st in line for my showing...out of 510 people :-) And I had about 17 others with me, it was smashing good fun!

    --Brian

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-19-2002 08:29 AM PT (US)     

     Kevin
     Romulan
     

    There was no line for the theater I saw it in. So technically I was first too.


    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-19-2002 10:31 AM PT (US)     

     dgoldwas
     Click Here to Email dgoldwas
     Romulan
     

    I felt the film, while more enjoyable than FOTR, was not as good as the first film. It was emotionally flat, and the Arwen/Aragorn stuff felt like a forced segment to imbue some depth to a film that was more about a bunch of things happening than anything else.

    That being said, Aragorn (at least) seems to be slowly filling out his role as future leader, and Gollum is the most interesting character in the film. And while he was superbly realized, I think all the talk (elsewhere) about trying to get him nominated for "Best Supporting Actor" is a piss-poor idea.

    The intercutting between the three story threads was done in a rather uninteresting way, and didn't heighten the drama at all - it almost felt like Jackson was saying "oh yeah, I gotta show what Merry and Pippin are doing....". And given the different pacing this film had compared to the first one, I don't think you could watch them both back-to-back; it would be too jarring a shift in tone.

    So, while I enjoyed the film (and am seeing it again tomorrow, with a more critical eye now that I've had time to absorb and think about it), I think it's far from an "amazing film". Entertaining movie, yes. Visually impressive, without a doubt. Amazing? Hardly. There are better films this year. (Hell, I saw CHICAGO last night and have more of an "excited high" about that one than I did about LOTR:TTT!)

    Dan

    Side note: when I saw the film 1.5 weeks ago, I was in the front of the line. so, nuh!

    [Message edited by dgoldwas on 12-19-2002]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-19-2002 11:05 AM PT (US)     

     Ed
     Romulan
     

    Peter Jackson said last year that he thought of FELOWSHIP in terms of a desperate chase with a few interludes spread along the way.

    TOWERS has a looser feel, without the relentless chase structure. While more reflective, even spiritual at times, it shares some of the book's weaknesses. In particular, Aragorn's primary relationship is with someone who isn't there, which creates a few problems. The film sorely misses Sir Ian whenever he's absent. He had much more to do in the book, and I hope we may see more of him in the inevitable Expanded Edition next November.

    Still it's an amazing achievement and maintains the lofty standards of the first film. Let's keep in mind how much lies ahead for part 3: Saurman's death, Sheelob, the seige of Minas Tirith, the romance of Eowyn and Faramir, the reforging of Narsil, the defeat of the Witch King, the trek up Mount Doom, the final battle before the Black Gate, etc., etc. I expect the next installment will be an amazing ride.

    [Message edited by Ed on 12-19-2002]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-19-2002 11:41 AM PT (US)     

     Marian Schedenig
     Click Here to Email Marian Schedenig
     Romulan
     

    Yes. I won't be able to decide how TTT compares to FOTR (better/equal/worse) before I've seen it again, but I don't think there's any doubt that ROTK will be the best part of the three.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-19-2002 02:04 PM PT (US)     

     Quill
     Romulan
     

    I agree with you Marian. While I still have not seen TTT...damn you all...I believe that once complete and viewed in a complete sitting that this trilogy will have a very satisfying, three act feel to it. ROTK will be the best as most well executed third acts are.

    I believe this is how Jackson has envisioned the process...hence the lack of an introduction or recap at the beginning of this film (which many narrow-sighted critics have complained about.) A recap would destroy the flow when the project is viewed as a whole.

    I feel the pull of the ring...I might not be able to stay away from the theatre tonight!

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-19-2002 05:00 PM PT (US)     

     Quill
     Romulan
     

    OK...here are my initial reactions:

    HIGHS
    Score! (and the use of it...)
    Gollum
    Helm's Deep

    LOWS
    Pacing
    Editing
    Blue Screen work for Merry & Pippin

    So, I did not enjoy it as much as the first film, but it still an impressive picture based on the material and the grandeur of it all. What made the first film perfect for me was the pacing and almost seamless editing. The Two Towers was my least favorite of the books, simply because there was too much material (there is such a thing) and the odd structure of it. Jackson fixed the structure (justifiably so), but unfortunately the three story arcs just don't mesh well. The editing is my real gripe--each scene in Fellowship seemed a perfect transition into the next. TTT is all over the place (which it truly is in context of the story), but I do not hold Jackson responsible for it, rather Tolkein and his propensity to bring too much to the table.

    Gollum was a fantastic character--complex, well animated, well acted. And what can I say about the score that hasn't already been said--I will echo the sentiment that Forth Eorlingas is an example of music in a film elevating a scene to a whole new level.

    The film felt a little ponderous in the first half and a bit overzealous in the second half. I think the flow of the narrative was adversly affected by forced cuts to limit the run time. Where I thought the extended cut of Fellowship disrupted the the flow of the film--I feel an extended cut of this film will help it out significantly.

    In the end a very enjoyable film and welcome addition to the story. It did not engage me as deeply as the first film, but I think that the films faults lie rooted in the source material. That being said, it is still a mile ahead of most films that have been released this year.

    I will hold fast to last post--when the trilogy is complete this film will play its part in the story arc, and I still believe that the best is yet to come.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-20-2002 07:22 AM PT (US)     

     Tristan
     Click Here to Email Tristan
     Romulan
     

    THE TWO TOWERS is everything that the recent STAR WARS flops should've been and be. I think some of you might be being a little tough on the film. I haven't had this much fun just watching a film in a long time. I felt like a kid during the finale battles, especially the assault on Sauromon. That feeling I once had a long, long time ago in an imagination that seems far, far away.

    The CGI was the best I have ever seen. This team should go over to ILM and start giving some instructional classes.

    The photography was beautiful and amazing, especially the scenes of Elrond's predicted doomed love for Arwen and Aragorn. And the Wraithe hovering on his dragon in front of Frodo as it grasps for the Ring. Brilliance.

    Lucas is dead to me. I guarantee you, EPISODE III will still not be on the level of this movie. I am so happy that Peter Jackson's trilogy is out at the same time...it will ultimately show George that his greediness and laziness reaped nothing and a small passionate director was able to rise and surpass what was the most anticipated trilogy of all time.

    The only thing George has is John Williams and the soundscapes of Ben Burtt. Other than that, he's been blessed to borrow Christopher Lee. Long Live Peter Jackson!!!

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-22-2002 06:06 AM PT (US)     
     

    Old Infopop Software by UBB

    © 1998-2011, The MovieMusic Company