-
Message Boards

Movie Soundtracks
Duel of the Fates or Arthur's Farewell? (Page 2)
Archive of old forum. No more postings.
Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.
This topic is 2 pages long: 1 2Author
Topic: Duel of the Fates or Arthur's Farewell?

Kris

Oscar® Winner

I love both scores and especially both cues. If I had to pick one of the two it'd have to be DUEL OF THE FATES. It's much more complicated and interesting to me.
posted 03-23-2000 01:13 AM PT (US) 
Thor

Oscar® Winner

More confusion: I just got the expanded version of FIRST KNIGHT, and listenened to it last night. When I came to "Arthur´s Farewell", I noticed a strong absence of choir untill the very end of the track. In the track before, however, "Camelot in Battle" or something like that, the choir was prominent, but in a more action-oriented mode. Would someone care to enlighten me as to why "Arthur´s Farewell" is compared to DOTF, when there´s hardly any choir there?
posted 03-23-2000 03:20 AM PT (US) 
James

Oscar® Winner

Thor -This is just a guess, but I don't think many people here have the expanded version... and as we have been talking about at else-threads, the expanded version you have probably has much different track listings.
On the official First Knight release, the choir begins only 10 seconds into "Arthur's Farewell," (maybe even shorter) and the choir continues throughout the entire 5+ minutes of the track.
James
posted 03-23-2000 12:55 PM PT (US) 
Aaron Collins

Oscar® Winner

I actually do not own the First Knight soundtrack. It is on my list though! I have Warriors of the Silver Screen release and it has The First Kinight suite. In the liner notes, it labels this cue with "No Surrender." This track begins with a very cool motif in the trumpet(basically an arpeggio). The next part jumps into a choral entrance and then to a very militaristic beat with the flutes and xylophone. The choir then comes in with a big entrance chanting. I believe this is the track we are discussing. Can you tell me if we are on the same page?I still find Duel of Fates more appealling, but the "No Surrender/Arthur's Farewell" has a great buildup and is also a great piece!
Absolutely no Orff references in these two pieces! If any pieces are paraphrasing Orff's great work, it would be Glory!
Thanks,
AaronNP: Carmina Burana(Orff)
posted 03-23-2000 01:37 PM PT (US) 
mlw
Oscar® Winner

Conan was purposely tooled to do Carmina whatnot BETTER. I watched the letterbox laser last week. Still a powerfully potent piece of work drenched with awe at the accomplishments of Kurosawa, Eisenstein, Leone. It's too comic-bookish to match any of them but it's worthy of the genre. Sort of starts out magnificently, better than anything by Lucas, then gradually peters out into cheap set-pieces, goofy snake cult, dim dialog, fake boulders, cheap locations in Spain. Poledouris wrote a score that takes the heat and kicks ass two decades later.Duel of the Fates, for its archetypes on your sleeve StarWarsishness is nevertheless one of my favorite things ever by Williams. As a composition it's maybe not that complicated but is beautifully styled. Almost made the film seem as good as its inspirations. Wished the movie matched the cue with a more refined Fritz Lang feel. And I liked the movie more than Star Wars 1, and 3.
First Knight score was ok. Tight contemporary update of Korngold-like material. Maybe too glossy, a muscular work out but lacking a specific purpose.
[This message has been edited by mlw (edited 23 March 2000).]
posted 03-23-2000 01:49 PM PT (US) 
James

Oscar® Winner

Aaron -That's the right one.
posted 03-23-2000 03:39 PM PT (US) 
H Rocco
Oscar® Winner

Hey Ware,Didja read the recent big bio of Oliver Stone that includes his and Milius' dueling accounts of Stone's original script to CONAN? Very interesting, what the two of them wanted to do, and what it became because neither of them really had the same vision.
Not a BAD picture by any means -- better than the jokier (and admittedly more fun, but not respectable) CONAN THE DESTROYER -- still, BARBARIAN is a damned ODD picture. Splendid production design by first-timer Ron Cobb (who also, as a draughtsman, previously came up with such amazing images as the skeleton of the space-jockey in the hull of the ship in the original ALIEN). And as good as the Varese expanded CD of CONAN is, it still left out at least two of my favorite cues (and what would it have cost them? The thing was recorded in ROME for Godssakes!)
Anyway, Stone's version of the script (I've only read the account in the aforementioned book) seems like a beautifully hallucinatory piece of work that I'd have been just as happy to see. Milius really isn't a great director -- come on, Michael, you can't pretend he is -- he's competent, at best -- but he did pull off some interesting stuff, the Snake Orgy in particular. Though that had as much to do with cutting as direction.
Last thought (and one I've posted many many times): Basil Poledouris' score for CONAN THE BARBARIAN is certainly one of the top ten, if not the top five, scores of the 1980s.
posted 03-23-2000 10:09 PM PT (US) 
Thor

Oscar® Winner

James, thanks for the info, but don't you think it's strange that the track "Arthur's Farewell/No Surrender" on the expanded album is different than the one on the official one, although they are titled the same? Also, does that mean that I don't have the choral, official "Arthur's Farewell" track at all? Someone who also owns the expanded care to enlighten me? Thanks.
posted 03-24-2000 07:43 AM PT (US) 
dantoris

Oscar® Winner

I recently played both cues for all of the my friends. Of them all, only two actually have an interested in film music. And of them all, all but two thought "Arthur's Farewell" was the better one. Even the guys you aren't into scores loved it over "Duel of the Fates," which they thought didn't have ENOUGH choral moments like "Arthur's Farewell."
posted 03-26-2000 11:56 PM PT (US) 
HAL 2000
Oscar® Winner

Interesting taste test dantoris.Thanks for posting the results. I also have listened to them back to back since I started this thread and read everyone's comments. They've both lovely examples of the type but Arthur is still the more full-bodied and kinetic of the two. That's why I prefer listening to it.[This message has been edited by HAL 2000 (edited 27 March 2000).]
posted 03-27-2000 06:11 AM PT (US) 
Thor

Oscar® Winner

SOMEONE PLEASE ANSWER ME!!! What track is "Arthur's Farewell" on the expanded issue?? The track before?
posted 03-27-2000 08:17 AM PT (US) 
dantoris

Oscar® Winner

While we're on the subject (and don't have time right now to read everyones' responses to see if this was mentioned), but how about "The Destruction of Xizor's Palace" from McNeely's Shadows of the Empire CD?Personally, I prefer it over "Duel of the Fates," simply because I liked McNeely's interpretation of Star Wars better than Williams on Episode 1. I thought Phantom Menace was missing that special Williams panache (sp?).
I enjoy them all, but I have to see I liked them in this order:
1) "Arthur's Farewell"
2) "The Destruction of Xizor's Palace"
3) "Duel of the Fates"NP: Titanic - "Never An Absolution" ***/***** (First track playing simply because I'm too busy writing this. As soon as I'm done, I'm skipping forward to the action/sinking music, which is the only reason I bought this tepid CD)
posted 03-27-2000 11:38 PM PT (US) 
dantoris

Oscar® Winner

Thor - the "Arthur's Farewell" we're talking about is from the official soundtrack release. It's actually miss-labeled (the expanded score CD has the track correctly titled "Fight For Camelot"). "Arthur's Farewell" on that CD (I'm assuming since I don't have the expanded one) is when Arthur's is sent out to sea after his death.Did I confuse ya?
NP: Titanic - "Death of Titanic" ***/***** (See? Told you I was gonna skip to the action).
posted 03-27-2000 11:54 PM PT (US) 
Thor

Oscar® Winner

AHA! Thanks a bunch, dantoris. Now I see. Yeah, the track title from my expanded version makes much more sense musically now that you mention it. I can relax now.
posted 03-29-2000 05:15 AM PT (US) 
Ron Pulliam

Oscar® Winner

Sorry to be so disagreeable here, but Orff's influence is very heavy in Goldsmith's "First Knight."There is nothing else in classical music like "Carmina Burana" -- Goldsmith most definitely modeled his choral music after it, probably because the director wanted him to (i.e., it was on the temp track).
"Duel of the Fates" is similar in tone but much less "like" Orff. It certainly draws inspiration from that source.
Of the two, "Duel of the Fates" is more pulsing and pervasive, "Arthur" more uplifting and enthralling.
Does either have to be "better"?
Ron
posted 03-29-2000 12:44 PM PT (US) Old Infopop Software by UBB
