The MovieMusic Store shopping cart   |  sign in
    SEARCH  
  • Home
  • Browse Store
    • New Soundtrack CDs
    • Top Sellers
    • Low Price New CDs
    • Used CDs
    • Soundtrack Compilations
    • Score Composers
    • Soundtrack Labels
    • Soundtracks by Year
    • ... detailed search page
  • Store Info
    • Happy Customers!
    • $1 Shipping
    • Accepted Payment Methods
    • Safe Shopping Guarantee
    • Shipping Rates & Policies
    • Our Privacy Policy
    • About Us
  • Help Center
    • My Account
    • How to Order
    • Search Tips
    • Return/Refund Policy
    • Cancelling Your Order
    • Contact the Store
  • The Lobby
  •   Message Boards
      Just Movies!
      What Have You Seen In OCTOBER?

    Archive of old forum. No more postings.

    Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.

    Author
    Topic:   What Have You Seen In OCTOBER?

     Graham Watt
     Click Here to Email Graham Watt
     Standard Userer
     

    Looks like I'll be seeing an awful lot of my place of work, but don't feel bad for ME! Oh no, you all go and have a great time watching movies. Bah, parasites the lot of you.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 09-30-2002 02:02 PM PT (US)     

     Philipp
     Standard Userer
     

    Flood of Fear (USA, 1958, Charles Chrichton)

    Don´t remember the actors, it was a british movie I fell over during switching. It was great though, it was like the foregoer for movies such as WATERWORLD and HARD RAIN. It evolves around two inmates who flee during a flood that destroys a town. One of them is being brought in prison unjustly, and he wants revenge from an old pal. Great camera, great acting and beautiful lighting. A very good b-movie, with love for cinema. The director went on to do some episodes for the Avengers and A Fish called Wanda.

    Best Wishes

    Philipp

    np: signs (james newton howard)

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 09-30-2002 02:57 PM PT (US)     

     Marian Schedenig
     Click Here to Email Marian Schedenig
     Standard Userer
     

    Had a DVD evening with friends tonight:

    Thir13en Ghosts (2001 version):

    I kinda liked it, or rather parts of it. It started out like the typical dumb modern ghost story, but I found it got quite interesting after the credits, at least for a while. There were lots of annoying bits all through the movie though, and they seemed to completely have stopped worrying about a plot towards the end. A shame, since the design was very nicely done, and the use of sound fx was also very good. I wonder if the original version is worth watching?

    The Time Machine (2002 version):

    Similar feelings here. I liked it, but there were so many stupid parts. And again, big explosions at the end to replace the missing plot. Plus it took me half the movie to get used to Guy Pearce, somehow he doesn't seem to fit into this type of movie. Still, it did make me want to read the novel.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 09-30-2002 05:38 PM PT (US)     

     JJH
     Click Here to Email JJH
     Standard Userer
     

    Thir13een Ghosts was such a lame movie. Great sounding DVD though. Love John Frizzell's score.


    Time Machine was lame. I like Guy Pearce. He does these movies well. See him also in Count of Monte Cristo, which also stars another unlikely actor, Jim Caviezel (looking like Antonio Banderas on the cover).

    WHat have I seen so far in October? Nothing of consequence yet, but I did see a bit of Butterfield 8, which stars Elizabeth Taylor. Cheeseball dialogue.
    Bronislau Kaper score, I think, though I could be mistaken. 'twas nice.

    I think today I'll watch Sleepy Hollow, a nice Halloween movie.

    NP -- Now Voyager: Classic Film Scores of Max Steiner, cond. by Gerhardt

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-01-2002 08:18 AM PT (US)     

     justin boggan
     Click Here to Email justin boggan
     Standard Userer
     

    Signs, a third time.

    Best movie and best score all year to me.

    Sure it didn't have a surprise twist ending like Unbreakable and 6th Sense, but it tied up so nicely in the end. Just a remarkable movie.

    So M. Night Shyamalan has done ghosts, super heroes and aliens. What's left? How about time travel? Or maybe he'll go for some gritty murder movie.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-01-2002 01:49 PM PT (US)     

     Graham Watt
     Click Here to Email Graham Watt
     Standard Userer
     

    Haven't seen anything except the inside of my office, but have fond memories of 13 GHOSTS. Not as scary as the remake of HOUSE ON HAUNTED HILL, but I admire the straightfaced approach in both films. And with the courage of their convictions. Haven't seen the original 13 GHOSTS. William Castle was a showman more than anything else, but his movies were the scariest thing in the world for me when I was twelve years old. Having said that, I've heard that his 13 GHOSTS is infantile even for a child.

    Justin, did you see my post last month about SIGNS? What did you feel was good about it? Maybe I missa da point de la film, but it didn't work for me at all. Boring, incomprehensible and unpersuasive. But you are free to convince me otherwise!

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-05-2002 08:50 AM PT (US)     

     Ted
     Click Here to Email Ted
     Standard Userer
     

    I just had the opportunity last Thursday to see the restored 70mm print of "Lawrence of Arabia" at the Castro Theater in San Francisco. Though I went with a group who really felt the length of the movie and I had seen it before, it was an amazing experience nonetheless.

    I have to say that I really wish filmmakers didn't abandon the 70mm format, because certain scenes in that movie were so amazing...well...I really don't know how to describe them. It goes without saying that I don't want to see that movie again on the TV for a long time.

    --Ted

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-06-2002 11:51 AM PT (US)     

     JJH
     Click Here to Email JJH
     Standard Userer
     

    dammit, i wish these restorations would get wider releases.
    i want to see Lawrence of Arabia on the big screen!


    saw Red Dragon yesterday. good stuff, and a nice score by Elfman...dig the Lalo Schifrin cameo.

    today I saw Moonlight Mile, which was much better than I thought it would be. I expected a replay of In the Bedroom.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-06-2002 08:33 PM PT (US)     

     joan hue
     Click Here to Email joan hue
     Standard Userer
     

    Sweet Home Alabama This is a rather insipid Reese Witherspoon movie. The
    previews, which were funny, showcased the ONLY funny parts of the movie. Josh Lucas,
    her hubby, looks like a young Paul Newman replete with his gravel voice, so not all was
    lost. Overall, it was a silly movie.

    Brotherhood of the Wolf This movie was never ending. I kept thinking that the
    end was near, but I was wrong. Way too long. Still it is a visually STUNNING movie.
    17th Century France meets The Matrix and Crouching Tiger. Parts of the movie are
    wonderful. Parts are dull. The first few fights were fascinating. Their repetition became
    boring. Best to use the fast forward button at times. The beast disappointed but kept my
    attention. I wonder why so many liked the music? Except for a slow theme at the end, I thought it rarely enhanced the movie.

    [Message edited by joan hue on 10-07-2002]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-07-2002 03:56 PM PT (US)     

     Bradley
     Click Here to Email Bradley
     Standard Userer
     

    One Hour Photo and Red Dragon. Two good movies with two very creepy characters (and that's not including Hannibal Lechter). Robin Williams and Ralph Fiennes play very good roles in both movies.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-09-2002 07:32 AM PT (US)     

     Graham Watt
     Click Here to Email Graham Watt
     Standard Userer
     

    MINORITY REPORT - So good for long stretches that it's a shame (for me) that I wasn't wholly satisfied. The concepts are felt and the philosophical ramifications multiply fascinatingly as the fiendishly complex plot develops, but some scenes are irritating - the comedic "eye rolling" (literally) sequence, the INDIANA JONES type chases... mmm, I'm not sure, but I wasn't convinced by some of those futuristic images - the ROCKETEER style jet power backs, the robot insect probes (the most literal of the "invasion of privacy" theme, otherwise a great scene), the vertical highways... and I felt that there were some uncomfortable tone changes.

    But for the most part it's still quite amazingly enthralling. As disconcerting as A.I., and nearly as difficult to evaluate, but it's also real SF, for which I'm grateful.

    Johnny Dubbelyou is as he has been of late - textural, but with exciting ATTACK OF THE CLONES action. I'll be getting the CD, because JW can do no wrong in my (fan)book.

    MINORITY REPORT (USA 2002)

    Directed by Steven Spielberg
    Screenplay by Scott Frank and Jon Cohen, from the short story by Philip K. Dick
    Photography by Janusz Kaminski
    Music by John Williams

    Main Cast: Tom Cruise, Colin Farrell, Max Von Sydow, Samantha Morton

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-13-2002 01:30 PM PT (US)     

     Graham Watt
     Click Here to Email Graham Watt
     Standard Userer
     

    I like Woody Allen, so I liked his new one, HOLLYWOOD ENDING, though I didn't like it as much as some of his others. The idea of a temporarily blind film director trying to get through the shooting of a movie without anyone noticing sounds hilarious, and indeed it's a perfect excuse for a more physical kind of humour than we're used to from the mature Woody. But the subdued slapstick isn't that funny, certainly not as good the scenes BEFORE the director goes blind, scenes which rely more on Woody's barbed, or here semi-barbed, dialogues. Hit-and-miss one-liners about movies and relationships again.

    I also feel that Woody is better when he's concise and brings his films in at under ninety minutes. Pushing the two hour mark, there isn't really enough material in HOLLYWOOD ENDING. But I still admire Woody, and I did have a sort of permanent smile on my face throughout. Well, maybe only a half-smile by the end.

    Old recordings, of course, on the soundtrack - "Hooray For Hollywood" etc.

    HOLLYWOOD ENDING (USA 2002)

    Directed by Woody Allen
    Screenplay by Woody Allen
    Photography by Wedigo Von Schultzendorff

    Main Cast: Woody Allen, Téa Leoni (absolutely radiant in this), Treat Williams, Debra Messing, Mark Rydell, George Hamilton, Tiffani Thiessen

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-20-2002 02:11 PM PT (US)     

     Graham Watt
     Click Here to Email Graham Watt
     Standard Userer
     

    Loved MEMENTO. Vaguely disappointed in director Nolan's new one INSOMNIA. Still quite compelling. Less showy yet slightly more pretentious than MEMENTO, but shows workings of intelligent minds nonetheless. Good ideas about guilt and evil. Wintery 24-hour day landscapes an important part of film - gives strange static notion of time. Audience feels jet-lag effect, similar to haggard Al Pacino character. Film very character based. Pacino good as Dormer (great name - geddit?). Robin Williams very good. Robin Williams always scarily good when not in comedies. Hillary Swank a bit wasted in nothing part.

    David Julyan mirrors monotony of insomnia (and may be perfect cure for it on CD).

    INSOMNIA (USA 2002)

    Directed by Christopher Nolan
    Screenplay by Hillary Seitz
    Photography by Wally Pfister
    Music by David Julyan

    Main Cast: Al Pacino, Robin Williams, Hillary Swank

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-20-2002 02:20 PM PT (US)     

     Kosh
     Standard Userer
     

    What the heck:

    One Hour Photo
    I was expecting more. Robin Williams gives a great performance, the wall of photo is very creepy, and filmed perfectly, but the script feels like a draft that was rushed through production, with great events in a weird order and with a bad pacing. The very ending is beautiful and clever, but it's just a tad unbelievable to see Sy Parrish having these wild personality changes.

    The Believer
    Absolutely loved this movie. Very realistic in every way, chilling, incredible performance by Ryan Gosling, with a great, makes-ya-think ending. The only question I have is why some scenes show an awful lot of grain while others are crystal clear. Other than that, amazing realistic movie about a very, very controversial subject.


    Kosh

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-20-2002 02:38 PM PT (US)     

     pietari
     Click Here to Email pietari
     Standard Userer
     

    Yesterday:

    HEARTS IN ATLANTIS:
    Rather dissapointing film, especially considering the very good, if not brilliant source material by King. Condensing the sprawling narrative of the book into 97 minutes didn`t do it too many favours. The book Hearts in Atlantis consists of 4 intertwining stories, a technique which ultimately brings meaning to the themes of the book ie. the disillusionment of growing up, corruption of innocence etc. A focus on a single story out of these four does no justice to King`s vision.

    On the other hand, the acting and the cinematography were rather good. Danna`s score was a bonus, too bad there wasn`t much of it.

    ALI G IN DA HOUSE:
    Quite funny first feature outing from UK comedian Sacha Baron Cohen. Appropriate pisstakes off `gangsta` culture amongst white teenagers. The biggest surpise was the score by someone called Adam F (no kidding!). Full-blown orchestral/choral bombasm, quite similar to Armstrong`s opening piece to Romeo & Juliet. Impressive work, but who is he?

    NP: K-19 ****/*****

    [Message edited by pietari on 10-21-2002]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-21-2002 12:27 PM PT (US)     

     Ted
     Click Here to Email Ted
     Standard Userer
     

    I just saw two movies this last weeked that can best be described as "controversial", BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE and RULES OF ATTRACTION.

    My take:

    RULES OF ATTRACTION:
    I went in expecting to hate this movie because of the reviews, but I don't know...maybe it's just me, but it sort of struck a chord. I think mostly it's because I'm in college right now as I'm typing this, so all the events, though exaggerated to make a point, made sense because I know people (and that's very sad) like the characters in this movie. Though I hardly fit into the clique portrayed in this movie, I'm around these people every day. So watching their lives collapse was really devestating. But that's just me. On a different note, though, Roger Avery needs to brush up on his technique, because, though I liked what he was saying, a lot of times how he was saying it was pretty obvious or stupid (especially some of the backwards photography that became redundant the third time he did it).

    BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE:
    Another movie that a lot of people will probably like and even more will hate with a passion. I thought it was amazing, though again, I didn't think it was without fault. Though I didn't always agree with Michael Moore's politics, he was able to make me at least ponder over every issue that he raised, which is a lot more than I can say about other narrative films, much less decent documentaries. The interviews this man manages to get are staggering, ranging from the Nichols brother that wasn't imprisoned for the Oklahoma City bombing to Marylin Manson (who is a lot more articulate and well spoken than people give him credit) and Moses himself, Charlton Heston. Overall an amusing and powerful work that sometimes veers too left for even the leftiest of the left (i.e. a college student at San Francisco State, i.e. myself).

    A good movie week, I must say.

    --Ted

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-21-2002 01:29 PM PT (US)     

     Marian Schedenig
     Click Here to Email Marian Schedenig
     Standard Userer
     

    Last monday: Minority Report

    Not great, but good. I found the opening scenes quite surprising, because they didn't remind me of Spielberg at all. The film as a whole wasn't typical Spielberg of course, but later it had typical Spielberg touches. I thought the future-ness (not too Sci-Fi I think) was well done, some bits were perhaps too obvious (I didn't need a whole minute of the eye-scanning posters to realize what they were doing ), but not annoyingly so. The plot was very intriguing, too. I didn't mind the action sequences, I thought they fitted well and didn't feel out of place. I also enjoyed much of the humour, including the eye rolling scene - they didn't feel out of place, unlike the T-Rex/lawyer/toilet scene in JP or the T-Rex/dog scene in Lost World. Score wasn't great, but supported the movie well. It's merely ok on CD, but has some good parts.

    The one thing I think it lacked is re-watch value. I'm glad I've seen it, but I don't feel the need to own it on DVD. The action scenes alone aren't that great (nothing wrong with them at all), and the rest of the film doesn't give me the feeling of being that good the second time around, though the potential for that kind of film seems to have been there.

    Today: Insomnia

    Everyone raved about Memento, so I decided not to spend money for a cinema ticket but get it on DVD instead - and I love it. People seem to be slightly disappointed by Insomnia, so I did decide to watch this in the theatre. I had read a bit of it before (avoiding anything about the plot), so I didn't expect something like Memento, but a more conventional, though well-done movie. And as a result I'm not disappointed at all, but found it very good. The premise is very intriguing, and the plot keeps going. You often read stuff about the hero becoming more and more like the villain about many movies, but you don't often see that really happening in "real" movies (unlike fantasy/Sci-Fi - nothing wrong with those), and looking very natural no less. Al Pacino is wonderful as always, and Robin Williams is excellent as well. I wouldn't say Hillary Swank was wasted; her part isn't very big, but it's important, and I think she did it nicely. Julyan's score works wonderfully in the movie. It's probably good on CD as well, but I don't know if I need to have it.

    It's a movie I'd like to see again someday, but nothing I have to get on DVD. It's not that it's lacking something though, I think it's just not the kind of movie I have to have. But then, I might think differently about this when the effect wears off.

    Funny enough, on the way back home, I stopped at a red traffic light. Before me was a woman on a moped, and hear helmet had "Nolan" printed on it.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-21-2002 03:15 PM PT (US)     

     Lou Goldberg
     Click Here to Email Lou Goldberg
     Standard Userer
     

    Caught a few episodes of THE AVENGERS: Epic, The Correct Way to Kill, Murdersville, The Joker, and Who's Who. Some episodes work better than others but they are very entertaining overall. Diana Rigg is amazing. She left the series to do film and stage work and she was good enough to do it too, but somehow these were her finest hours and she didn't see it at the time.

    TO THE ENDS OF THE EARTH (1948) Directed by Robert Stevenson. A very solid thriller about a US treasury guy hunting down an international heroin ring. Whether you think drugs should be legal or not this had inventive ideas and a twist I never would have guessed in a million years. Dick Powell is just great as a tough guy and it had a good B-movie score by George Duning.

    NIGHT GALLERY (1969) Pilot movie for the series directed by Boris Segal (THE OMEGA MAN), Barry Shear (WILD IN THE STREETS), and Steven Spielberg and wonderfully scored by Billy Goldenberg. The Spielberg segment was artier than his later films would be but not without interest. The Shear segment was the most successful. The ending you could spot a mile away but the characters were what propelled it and the scene between the Nazi and the girl on the other side of the wall was probably the most inventive thing in the film.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-23-2002 12:43 AM PT (US)     

     joan hue
     Click Here to Email joan hue
     Standard Userer
     

    Been renting movies this past week.

    Jezebel A 1938 movie starring Bette Davis and Henry Fonda. She won the Oscar
    for her portrayal of the too independent and tough but inevitably tender southern lady.
    I found myself getting hooked on this soap opera, and I enjoyed watching all the
    melodrama. Lovely themes in Max Steiner’s score.

    Windtalkers Bbbllleccckkkk! Woo can do better than making over 2 hours of
    emulation of the first 20 minutes of Saving Private Ryan. One battle after another. He
    forgot to really develop characters so that we could care about them. I really thought
    Horner’s score was themeless and weak. He too can do better.

    Mr. Deeds Shoot me for ever wasting my money on an Adam Sander movie.
    Insipid. However, parts of the score by Terry Castellucci were really good. I need to keep my ears open for his future scores.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-24-2002 09:17 PM PT (US)     

     Lou Goldberg
     Click Here to Email Lou Goldberg
     Standard Userer
     

    The latest:

    THE KISS OF THE VAMPIRE, a Hammer film without Lee or Cushing. I was told it was going to be pretty solid but it turned out to be unexciting and the ending was particularly weak. It had a good score by James Bernard but some of the best cues were left off the GDI Hammer Vampire Collection CD that has music from it.

    MONKEYBONE. A neat premise (a guy goes into a coma and hangs out in the collective unconscious trying to figure out a way to return to life) and good visual effects but unltimately no real humor. Fonda and McGowan were pretty to look at though. Anne Dudley scored and gave it some quirky music but nothing special there either.

    I OFTEN THINK OF PIROSCHKA. One of a series of 50s German films currently touring the country and playing in places like NY and Chicago. Colorful but highly romanticized view of both Hungarian country life and youthful, bittersweet love affairs. Both the female leads were beautiful so that you could appreciate the poor guy's situation in having to make a choice between them. But once they found out about each other you knew he'd wind up with neither one. That's true to life but with so much falsifying going on elsewhere they could have given us a happy ending too.

    [Message edited by Lou Goldberg on 10-29-2002]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-29-2002 09:43 PM PT (US)     

     Dylan
     Click Here to Email Dylan
     Standard Userer
     

    I have watched some truly beautiful and fantastic films lately for the first time, including a widescreen version of the beautifully photographed Sons and Lovers. I've also watched several more films, which I'd like to sit down and take time to comment on, but I don't have the time right now...but here are a few that I've seen, all for the first time: The Bridge on the River Kwai, Carnival of Souls (the original), The Big Sleep, The Elephant Man (which I bought...one of my favorites...this is the first time I've seen it in widescreen, and it was definately an experiance), and "Night of the Hunter," one of the greatest movies I have seen in my life. There are others as well, but I can't recall at the moment. Take care.

    With Best Regards,
    Dylan

    [Message edited by Dylan on 10-30-2002]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-30-2002 06:29 PM PT (US)     
     

    Old Infopop Software by UBB

    © 1998-2011, The MovieMusic Company