The MovieMusic Store shopping cart   |  sign in
    SEARCH  
  • Home
  • Browse Store
    • New Soundtrack CDs
    • Top Sellers
    • Low Price New CDs
    • Used CDs
    • Soundtrack Compilations
    • Score Composers
    • Soundtrack Labels
    • Soundtracks by Year
    • ... detailed search page
  • Store Info
    • Happy Customers!
    • $1 Shipping
    • Accepted Payment Methods
    • Safe Shopping Guarantee
    • Shipping Rates & Policies
    • Our Privacy Policy
    • About Us
  • Help Center
    • My Account
    • How to Order
    • Search Tips
    • Return/Refund Policy
    • Cancelling Your Order
    • Contact the Store
  • The Lobby
  •   Message Boards
      Just Movies!
      Peter Rainer on MOULIN ROUGE

    Archive of old forum. No more postings.

    Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.

    Author
    Topic:   Peter Rainer on MOULIN ROUGE

     Luscious Lazlo
     Click Here to Email Luscious Lazlo
     Standard Userer
     

    http://www.nymag.com/page.cfm?page_id=4720

    Peter Rainer on MOULIN ROUGE:

    "Lurhmann is a student of Busby Berkeley at his most high-fructose as well as the tutti-frutti tradition of Bombay musicals, with their berserk wriggling and instantaneous breaking-into-song. He makes one long for the relative sedateness of the Ken Russell who made TOMMY. Luhrmann hauls in everything from Rodgers & Hammerstein to 'Nature Boy' to 'Roxanne' to LaBelle's 'Lady Marmalade', and the songs tend to segue into one another, medley-style. It's like being trapped inside a fever dream of Oscar-night production numbers."

    "Although McGregor and Kidman do their own singing, they seem vaguely disembodied when they warble---not so much because of technical difficulties but because the emotions don't seem to be emanating from the person...None of these characters resonates even as an archetype because Luhrmann is too busy trying to ram them down our throats. Fellini at his most orgiastic never gave us so many lurid close-ups of grease-painted cavorters and plug-uglies. And this is a movie that pretends to be making some kind of fashion statement! Even Nicole Kidman has a fright-night pallor: dark-rimmed eyes, fire-truck-red lips, bone-white complexion---all this before she gets consumption."

    "Lurhmann can't be criticized for not achieving what he set out to do. MOULIN ROUGE has the awful completeness of a fully realized bum vision...His movie is reminiscent of those bygone behemoth attempts to revive silent slapstick comedy, such as IT'S A MAD MAD MAD MAD WORLD, in which an overload of antics replaced inspiration. MOULIN ROUGE references just about every splashy forties musical ever made, plus quite a few others, but what's missing is the simplicity of spirit that gave the best musicals their transcendence."

    "Lurhmann is not wrong in believing that new ways have to be dreamed up to connect the musical with a new moviegoing generation, but what he's done in MOULIN ROUGE is to scavenge all the old ways and then turn up the heat, burning away any honest feeling. He gives you way too much of what you didn't really want in the first place: soulless high jinks."

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 01-23-2002 02:18 PM PT (US)     

     John Maher
     Click Here to Email John Maher
     Standard Userer
     

    I'm not sure about all that; but I hated "Moulin Rouge". It simply wasn't possible, for me to have hated it, more.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 02-06-2002 01:38 PM PT (US)     

     Lou Goldberg
     Click Here to Email Lou Goldberg
     Standard Userer
     

    Although it had a brief moment of fun here and there, and it was technically accomplished, there wasn't any air to breathe in this film. Not a single moment of reality was allowed to intrude and so it felt like being submerged for 2 hours. Plus, there was just too much circus and too much gayness in the proceedings for my tastes. I know a lot of people who got into this, but I wasn't one of them.

    It seems I am so down on just about every film I've seen lately. I don't want to be. But no one makes stuff I like anymore. When was the last good jungle trek movie or good Hemingway adaptation or intelligent science-fiction film or......never mind.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 02-25-2002 08:34 PM PT (US)     

     James
     Click Here to Email James
     Standard Userer
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by Lou Goldberg:
    intelligent science-fiction film

    What did you think of Dark City?

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 02-25-2002 11:10 PM PT (US)     

     joan hue
     Click Here to Email joan hue
     Standard Userer
     

    Moulin Rouge: I have a hate/love relationship with this movie. I’m glad I rented it on
    DVD so at times I could employ the fast forward button and the rewind button.
    First of all, strobe-light, blink-of-an-eye editing does not a good movie make. The
    director needs to study the time it takes an image on the screen to register in the human
    brain. At times, his editing was so annoying, whole musical numbers were blurs. I love
    dancing, but I’d like to see at least two whole dance steps before a change. One-eighth of
    a dance step just isn’t enough. This is my main complaint. (Too quickly edited and too
    many bizarre, freakish characters that made Cabaret seem like a Disney flick.

    Still...As good as Kidman was, I was totally hooked by Ewan McGregor’s passionate
    singing and heartfelt performance. He was stunning. Some of the numbers between him
    and Kidman merited rewinding and reviewing, especially the series of love songs sung on
    her roof. The orchestrations of the songs were powerful and some of the best I’ve ever
    heard.

    It’s a Dr. Jekyell and Mr. Hyde type of movie.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 02-26-2002 02:22 PM PT (US)     

     Ken S
     Click Here to Email Ken S
     Standard Userer
     

    The last (about) 15 years of my life I've been seriously wondering why most of the people on this planet are reluctant to admit that life COULD be beautiful.

    Underneath my very optimistic, bright & happy personality I am probably even more cynical creature than old Lou here - I really wouldn't mind if this planet would be blown to bits - but as long as I have to live here with my fellow people, I admire all them who are bold enough to at least try to remind us that LIFE is FOR LIVING (- and I myself belong to this group of people who want to make every possible effort to remind fellow people about life's more positive ingredients).

    Being such a complicated creature, I always fall in love with the movies which dare to be as complicated as I am. MOULIN ROUGE is exactly this: It speaks about the joy, the beauty, of life itself, but includes also the message of our mortality and the more negative aspects of life - and still gives the viewer faith to believe that LIFE WINS ...joy wins, beauty wins. And that is the truth.

    Cynicism is based only on doubting things - LIFE, on the other hand, is REAL; life contains good things and bad things, and yet the good things are those which people want to "live" and to remember.

    Now, I know MOULIN ROUGE is only a movie, and has its flaws (- like too quick editing -) but still I'm amazed when people claim it wasn't anything realistic. GEEEZZZ - life itself isn't NEVER realistic, but only movies are blamed being unrealistic. Sure, the comedics of MOULIN ROUGE may have made it impossible for some people to swallow it - but unfortunately I say that it has been those people's own fault, not the movie's fault, if the people haven't been able to get touched by it.

    MOULIN ROUGE possesses an incredible amount of emotion for the people who are willing to see it, to feel it, and to believe it,
    that LIFE is and will always be BEAUTIFUL, JOYFUL, and meant to be lived for.

    KEN

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 02-27-2002 04:02 PM PT (US)     
     

    Old Infopop Software by UBB

    © 1998-2011, The MovieMusic Company