-
Message Boards

Just Movies!
Impending Strike -- Doom or Boon?
Archive of old forum. No more postings.
Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.
Author
Topic: Impending Strike -- Doom or Boon?

Marc Flake

Standard Userer

Considering the abysmal movies released so far this year and the fact that "Gladiator" was able to win the Academy Award for Best Picture, does anybody else think the upcoming strike by writers to be a potential boon to motion pictures?Recently there's been a spate of sequels, prequels and remakes that indicates to me there is a lack of imagination out there in La La Land.
I think it's time for a clean sweep of all those tired old hacks. It's time for some new blood.
Of course, we'll have to get rid of a few producers before a total clean up can be made.
How about it. Are y'all with me?
posted 05-02-2001 01:41 PM PT (US) 
Dan Brecher

Standard Userer

You know, I was thinking about this the other day, about "young blood" as you put it. I think in about 30 years time (pending the movie industy is still going strong) we'll be seeing changes. It seems a long way off, but I think we will definately see changes in studio direction and award nominations in the future.I was actually shocked when New Line fired DeLuca earlier this year. He had given the greenlight to many many good films, and the fact that 2001 wasn't a good year for the studio proves who ruthless these older bosses can be in sacking the man. Execs are getting younger, but the problem is they seem more in it for the money then the movies, so for a long time to come you can still expect endless sequelx and plotless action movies because they know they'll make instant $$$. In part, it's our fault for going to see these movies. If more people would go and see a Magnolia over a Freddie Got Fingered then we'd be seeing greater films.
With the digital age looming, and films becoming cheaper to make, we're only going to see more and more sh*t on our screens, I think such releases will cause a lack of interest in movies from the public, hence my questioning the movie industry still thriving in 30 years time.
Dan (UK)
posted 05-03-2001 04:04 AM PT (US) 
Marc Flake

Standard Userer

No offence, Dan, but I considered "Who Fingered Freddie" and its ilk as one of the abysmal movies released this year.To me, the problem is all the 20-something writers and producers who have the power in Hollywood these days.
Look at the movies they are producing, either gross-out or blow-em-up types. Even Gladiator used some weird MTV editing chops that gave me a headache.
I can't even find something in the one-night rentals at the Blockbuster clone I frequent. Most of the movies I rent are "out on the floor." In fact, the best videos I've rented this year have been the "From the Earth to the Moon" tapes from HBO.
posted 05-03-2001 12:53 PM PT (US) 
Dan Brecher

Standard Userer

Marc,You missread my post. I stated that if only more people would go and see a film like Magnolia instead of movies like Freddie Got Fingered then Hollywood would start making better films.
Trust me, these abysmal gross out teen comedy, endless sequels, plotless movies that are violent for violence sake? I hate them all oh so much.... My point was, these unfortunately still make money, and with movies soon becoming cheaper to make we're going to see more and more of them, and even those who like them will quickly become bored, and the industry is going to have to wake up.
As a writer and filmmaker in practice, I feel just as strongly as you do about this.
Dan (UK)
PS: I am also not the biggest fan of Gladiator either. Yet more style over content.
posted 05-03-2001 02:21 PM PT (US) 
Marc Flake

Standard Userer

OOpss.
posted 05-03-2001 02:43 PM PT (US) 
Dan Brecher

Standard Userer

Ooops indeed. Sad truth is, people pay to see such movies.
Dan (UK)
NP: Mummy Returns ****/****
[Message edited by Dan Brecher on 05-04-2001]
posted 05-04-2001 02:25 AM PT (US) 
SBD
Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by Dan Brecher:
Ooops indeed. Sad truth is, people pay to see such movies.
Dan (UK)
NP: Mummy Returns ****/****
[Message edited by Dan Brecher on 05-04-2001]
Couldn't agree more, Dan. But if you think about it, an even more dire question can be raised: Who's stupider: people who pay to SEE these films, or people who pay to MAKE these films? In this (and only this)respect, I consider the strike to be a boon.
posted 05-04-2001 07:18 AM PT (US) 
Audacity

Standard Userer

Although I agree with you guys that movies like Freddy Got Fingered have no business being made, my question is, why can't there be a heathly balance of both pointless action movies and what you are calling good movies, like Magnolia? I think society needs both and I sure like being able to see both kinds of movies.Two of the best movies I saw last year were, Snow Falling on Cedars and Cider House Rules, but the two movies I enjoyed the most were Gladiator and Gone in 60 Seconds. I agree that there has been a slight decline in Film Making over the years but I am very confident that there will always be great movies that make you think and really show true emotion.
Audacity
posted 05-10-2001 03:29 PM PT (US) 
Marc Flake

Standard Userer

The strike is over and it looks like we'll be getting more of the same. I found the following news story from Cannes to be very appropos for this Topic. As ususal, Nick Nolte succinctly describes the problem.
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0,,2-201306,00.html
posted 05-14-2001 07:34 AM PT (US) Old Infopop Software by UBB
