-
Message Boards

Just Movies!
PLANET OF THE APES is a go (Page 2)
Archive of old forum. No more postings.
Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.
This topic is 2 pages long: 1 2Author
Topic: PLANET OF THE APES is a go

Luscious Lazlo

Standard Userer

http://www.filmmusic.uk.net/1998/nov98/vsd5848.htmlRob Barnett's review of *Apes* is a level-headed antidote to Nicolai Zwar's over-rating opinion. I admit that *Apes* is a brilliant collection of sound effects. (Especially an eerie track at the end called "The Revelation, Part 2". And "The Clothes Snatchers" is a fabbadelic drum track.) But does it really qualify as music?
posted 03-24-2000 07:49 AM PT (US) 
Bulldog
Standard Userer

YES!!!PLANET OF THE APES may or may not be good music in your opinion.
It would be very difficult to assert that the music is not perfectly suited for the film.
And for your melodic taste...there IS a *tonal* theme. (There are plenty of atmospheric themes, based not necessarily on melody but on a certain--musical folks help me out--pitch (?) I think.)
But seriously, this whole "Is it good/bad?" question needs to evolve, on both sides--the melody fans and the avant garde advocates need to readjust their criticisms.
It needs to reflect the nature of film music's existence...to be music in film. Music in film needs to be accessible for the viewer...to an extent.
Would PLANET OF THE APES be better if it sounded like GONE WITH THE WIND? Absolutely not!
Jerry Goldsmith, I am certain, had no intention of PLANET OF THE APES being judged for its musical value alone. (I love it, sure.) If he did, I would be disappointed.
But for those who dislike the music...remember that the music gains significance from its worth in the film.
Film scores deserve to be judged first and foremost in the film.
I'll go so far as to suggest that film music has no business being accepted or rejected on the basis of musical value alone. Film music is not written for musical value *alone* (or at least it should not be).
It needs to succeed within the framework of the film, and as the film necessitates it to, first.
[This message has been edited by Bulldog (edited 24 March 2000).]
posted 03-24-2000 08:41 AM PT (US) 
mlw
Standard Userer

Goldsmith's Apes score is at the least one of the greatest applications of music in films, is a pioneering benchmark that opened hitherto unexplored spaces in modern compositional theory and gave it all context in idea and emotive FORCE. Other scores previously used modernistic technique (c.f. Alex North, Leonard Rosenman) but this one connected as one of the first of the modern "blockbusters" with reconnoitering influences throughout contemporary classical music-- it actually brought hardcore posttonal music to the mainstream and created value whereas before such would be exclusive to academe. There are few scores with such a powerful influence upon later generations of composers. Aside from that it is a startlingly beautiful expression of pure musicality with its gem-like intricacy of interlacing structure and advanced thesis in sound, space, pattern, and that Goldsmithian exultation in music-making as an end in itself, fierce and uncompromised. Damn, Howard L, I'm starting to see your point all over again![This message has been edited by mlw (edited 24 March 2000).]
posted 03-24-2000 08:50 AM PT (US) 
Bryan T
Standard Userer

Actually, I've never read Boulle's original book, but it would be interesting to see a more faithful film version. Don't get me wrong, the original is a great film, but I wouldn't mind seeing what Burton and Elfman have up their sleeves.
A word of warning for those involved, though: RETURN TO OZ. I thought this was a pretty good movie, and it was definitely closer in tone to L. Frank Baum's original novels than the MGM musical. Unfortunately, most people couldn't get THE WIZARD OF OZ out of their heads. Burton and his team are going to have to be careful in how they present the new Apes film. It's too bad about Return to Oz; it's really not a bad movie, and it has a hauntingly beautiful score by David Shire.
Then again, the audience for OZ and APES are probably pretty different.
posted 03-24-2000 09:33 AM PT (US) 
Howard L
Standard Userer

"But does it really qualify as music?"That is a question that I don't think about because the emotion that is unleashed in these weird atonal snatches has a power no different from music in, shall we say, its more-conventional sense. When I think of Apes I think of the beach at the very end and hear in my mind's ear the percussive sound of primeval drums and the ricochet of a "bedspring", followed by this incredible silence broken only by waves washing ashore as the camera pulls back and reveals the object of Taylor's anguish. Goldsmith also wrote a marvelous driving and bluesy score for Twilight Zone's "The Big Tall Wish" but it is a rising 8-tone blare of a warning signal he injected that remains indelible beyond the rest.
It is the little things he does, helped pioneer, that makes me sit back and say...wow.
posted 03-24-2000 09:39 AM PT (US) 
Luscious Lazlo

Standard Userer

As you can see, I had to play devil's advocate in order to get a response out of Howard. Please be assured that I'm not the anti-experimental fuddy-duddy that I pretended to be.
http://www.oldkingcole.com/reviews/soundtracks/pota_rev.htmlRAY SAYS: "Goldsmith scored the film for an extremely unusual orchestral ensemble including tuned mixing bowls, a bass slide-whistle, and the cuika, a Brazilian instrument that sounds amazingly like the vocalizing of an excited ape." (Played by the renowned cuika virtuoso, Andre Lux.)
[This message has been edited by Luscious Lazlo (edited 24 March 2000).]
posted 03-24-2000 09:52 AM PT (US) 
MWRuger

Standard Userer

Don't kill me, please!I hate to say it, but this is just a score (POTA) that I have never been able to get into even after repeated listenings.
I like it fine on the screen while viewing the film (which is where you would hope that it would work), but away from it it leaves me cold.
Everybody keeps saying it is incredible, but I just don't hear it. I kinda have the same problem with Dragonslayer.
Oh well.
posted 03-24-2000 10:08 AM PT (US) 
Luscious Lazlo

Standard Userer

http://www.intrada.com/8006.htm Douglass Fake's review
http://www.crosswinds.net/~scoreland/planetap.htm Humoristical review by "Izzie the Inner Lizard". (Alias Jason Blalock.)
posted 03-24-2000 10:20 AM PT (US) 
Chris Kinsinger

Standard Userer

Mr. Ruger,"Dragonslayer" and "Planet Of The Apes" both represent the kind of music that might accompany a descent into the pit of hell.
Not an easy, or a pleasant listening experience.
But...a truly brilliant facsimile of the Unknown, composed by two of the most complex artists ever to grace the cinema with their talents.
The fact that many listeners don't appreciate it is irrelevant. It's not pleasant music. It wasn't meant to be.
[This message has been edited by Chris Kinsinger (edited 24 March 2000).]
posted 03-24-2000 09:14 PM PT (US) 
joan hue

Standard Userer

To: New Film Score Sounds. (Interesting name.)I like your cast for Gilligan's Island. Perhaps it should be a movie instead of a TV show. The only cast person I'd change is for Mary Ann. I'd make her Hollywood's ultimate sweetie, Meg Ryan.
Chris, you describe the scores to Dragonslayer and Planet of the Apes well. They fit their dark movies perfectly, but I can't play them separated from the movie.
posted 03-24-2000 10:30 PM PT (US) 
Nicolai P. Zwar

Standard Userer

I really, really like listening to PLANET OF THE APES. A lot. Not only is it wonderful music that works terrific in the movie, but I don't even think it is a particularly difficult score to appreciate on its own. True, it's atonal and serial music, but it's also very inventive and clever, a very lucid, clear, direct score. But of course, I like music by Bartok and Boulez as well, so what do I know?
NP: Arnold Schönberg "Chamber Symphony"
Chamber Orchestra of Europe conducted by Claudio Abbado (Deutsche Grammophon)posted 03-25-2000 02:13 AM PT (US) 
Andre Lux
unregistered
I love to hear "Planet of the Apes" everytime. It never stops to amaze me how great and inventive this score is. Always find something new that was hide inside the orchestra performance (specially the Cuica, which I played so beautifully, as mr. Laszo well pointed!!
)I realy don't care what the general masses think about it...
There's always a new album from Enya or Yani for them to get pleased with easy-listening music, you know!posted 03-25-2000 05:53 AM PT (US) 
Howard L
Standard Userer

"I like it fine on the screen while viewing the film (which is where you would hope that it would work), but away from it it leaves me cold.""They fit their dark movies perfectly, but I can't play them separated from the movie."
I especially relate to comments such as these. As an 'orthodox' film music appreciator I've always felt the scene-with-music's the thing, a good album's merely a plus. Guess I admire most those composers who inhabit the best of both worlds, however.
[This message has been edited by Howard L (edited 25 March 2000).]
posted 03-25-2000 09:20 AM PT (US) 
Valere

Standard Userer

I Think that Hollywood should re-make EVERYTHING that they have produced in the past 75 Years. This will keep everybody SO busy,(except for scripwriters,who needs them when you can just dust off an old script?) And we can watch this tripe,and compare it to the original. Can't anyone out in Hollywood come up with something original?
What Crap!
NP:SUPERMAN: disc 1,track 9
posted 03-25-2000 11:45 AM PT (US) 
Chris Kinsinger

Standard Userer

...and she's listening to SUPERMAN, which has only been done a million times!
posted 03-25-2000 11:49 AM PT (US) 
Valere

Standard Userer

HE is listening to the EXPANDED release,which we had to wait 20 years for!
posted 03-26-2000 04:18 AM PT (US) 
Nicolai P. Zwar

Standard Userer

Old wisdom has it that there are only twelve plots. So twelve movies, twelve books, twelve stage plays... that's all that's needed. Everything else is just telling the same thing again and again. I don't know why so many people are worried about remakes? Sometimes it pays off and the result is a good or even great movie. SCARFACE, BEN HUR, THE FLY, INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS, THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN were all good movies - some of them are classics - and they were all remakes. True, it doesn't always work like this, at many other times the result is rather lame, like STAGECOACH, or the third BODY SNATCHERS movie for example, if not downright ridiculous (I mention no names here). Anyway, it depends on a lot of things. Certainly Boulle's 1963 novel "La Planète des Singes" can be filmed again and from a completely different perspective than Franklin J. Schaffner's movie. Like Francis Ford Coppola's DRACULA was sure different from Tod Browning's DRACULA. I'd rather have a well thought out and well done remake than some unimaginatively hackneyed so called "original story". Especially when it comes to movie making, the story is much less important than they way it is told.
posted 03-26-2000 04:58 AM PT (US) 
Marc Flake

Standard Userer

Nicolai:Actually, there are now 20 master plots. There used to be 24, but four relied too much on the interaction among "The gods" to make it as modern stories (although last year's "The Muse" came awfully close).
You're right, we do have a lot of retellings of the same story. Look at how often the "savior" story has been told: Messiah, Christ and Arthur; "The Omega Man," The whole Star Wars saga and "The Matrix." That's not a comprehensive list, but representative of the "savior" plot line.
I think "Magnificent Seven" was an effective retelling of the plot of how misfits acheive redemption, not just a retelling of "Seven Samurai."
And I'm not saying that Tim Burton won't find a unique way to tell the two stories contained in the "Apes" saga -- I KNOW he will. I'm lamenting that there are other stories out there that haven't been told and will never be told because the people with money don't want to take a risk on something that won't make them more money.
This happens not only in movies, but also in book publishing. While I love Star Trek and Star Wars, I'm appalled at all the knock-offs related to these two sagas that take up so much space at the book stores. I'm truly amazed that a new genre like "alternate history" has been able to establish a beachhead in the business because publishing houses seem so intent on just printing the same old stuff. Sometimes I wander like a man in the desert trying to find plots that I like in the standard fiction sections.
To get this back ON TOPIC (i.e., movie music), I'll bet we're missing a lot of good music from composers no one wants to take a chance on. Which is why we had a little thread not too long ago about the future of film music.
I wish Burton luck, he'll find a way to retell "Planet of the Apes" that won't be imitative. But I'm a little disappointed because the director of "Nightmare Before Christmas," "Edward Scissorhands" and "James and the Giant Peach" has moved away from taking risks with new stories to retelling old ones, like "Sleepy Hollow." It seems he has acquired the Hollywood Fever that kills innovation.
Marc
posted 03-26-2000 08:39 AM PT (US) 
Nicolai P. Zwar

Standard Userer

"I'll bet we're missing a lot of good music from composers no one wants to take a chance on."Marc, that's probably true. Of course, truly "new" things always take a while to catch on. Though I think in the future, big special effects and spectacular star ships, dinosaurs, earthquakes etc. will be - thanks to modern computer technology - much cheaper to produce and available to every b-movie producer. Altogether, that's actually a pretty good thing, because big time studios won't be able to draw audiences based on production values alone anymore. Production prices are at an all time high right now, but movies will cost much less in the future. Inventivenes will be needed and more appreciated. (THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT and THE SIXTH SENSE were first signs into that direction.) I think this will open up the way for fresh and young composers as well. I not only hope so, but I really think so, too.
posted 03-26-2000 11:25 AM PT (US) Old Infopop Software by UBB
