The MovieMusic Store shopping cart   |  sign in
    SEARCH  
  • Home
  • Browse Store
    • New Soundtrack CDs
    • Top Sellers
    • Low Price New CDs
    • Used CDs
    • Soundtrack Compilations
    • Score Composers
    • Soundtrack Labels
    • Soundtracks by Year
    • ... detailed search page
  • Store Info
    • Happy Customers!
    • $1 Shipping
    • Accepted Payment Methods
    • Safe Shopping Guarantee
    • Shipping Rates & Policies
    • Our Privacy Policy
    • About Us
  • Help Center
    • My Account
    • How to Order
    • Search Tips
    • Return/Refund Policy
    • Cancelling Your Order
    • Contact the Store
  • The Lobby
  •   Message Boards
      Movie Soundtracks
      Krystal Skull track order

    Archive of old forum. No more postings.

    Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.

    Author
    Topic:   Krystal Skull track order

     Cole
     Click Here to Email Cole
     Standard Userer
     

    How would you reorganize the tracks on the CD to run chronologically with the film?

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-15-2008 02:51 PM PT (US)     

     NeoVoyager
     Click Here to Email NeoVoyager
     Standard Userer
     

    Never heard of that score.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-15-2008 04:17 PM PT (US)     

     scoreguy16
     Click Here to Email scoreguy16
     Standard Userer
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by Cole:
    How would you reorganize the tracks on the CD to run chronologically with the film?

    There's something I've never been able to understand. This isn't supposed to come off as an insult, but I am sure it will. Are you watching the music WITH the film? To me, composers arrange the tracks the way they do on their CD's for a reason. A lot of the time, if you listen to a CD in order outside of the film, the CD is boring. So they mix it up a bit to create an enjoyable listening experience.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-15-2008 05:41 PM PT (US)     

     Frank V
     Click Here to Email Frank V
     Standard Userer
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by Cole:
    How would you reorganize the tracks on the CD to run chronologically with the film?

    See: http://jwfan.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1006

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-16-2008 12:36 AM PT (US)     

     Swashbuckler
     Click Here to Email Swashbuckler
     Standard Userer
     

    quote:
    There's something I've never been able to understand. This isn't supposed to come off as an insult, but I am sure it will. Are you watching the music WITH the film? To me, composers arrange the tracks the way they do on their CD's for a reason. A lot of the time, if you listen to a CD in order outside of the film, the CD is boring. So they mix it up a bit to create an enjoyable listening experience.

    True, but the composer's idea of an enjoyable listening experience isn't always the same as the listener's idea of an enjoyable listening experience.

    The choices that are made when producing an album aren't necessarily what the listener wants to hear. John Williams is actually a good example of this, he is one of my favorite composers but also one of my least favorite album producers. On the other hand, I like Elliot Goldenthal's albums much better. They're not doing anything different, both are creating non-chronological presentations that mix cues up within tracks, but while I am generally not going to like Williams' choices, I will tend to be satisfied with Goldenthal's.

    So while the composer may have perfectly logical reasons for restructuring the score for its respective album, the taste of the listener comes into play once they buy the record. Some people feel that there are some scores which are more linear in structure that are better served by a more chronological presentation; either way, the film order is the original default (not counting edits, retracking and whatnot) from which the listener may or may not choose to reprogram at their convenience.

    [Message edited by Swashbuckler on 06-18-2008]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-16-2008 01:37 PM PT (US)     

     scoreguy16
     Click Here to Email scoreguy16
     Standard Userer
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by Swashbuckler:

    True, but the composer's idea of an enjoyable listening experience isn't always the same as the listener's idea of an enjoyable listening experience.

    The choices that are made when producing an album aren't necessarily what the listener wants to hear. John Williams is actually a good example of this, he is one of my favorite composers but also one of my least favorite album producers. On the other hand, I like Elliot Goldenthal's albums much better. They're not doing anything different, both are creating non-chronological presentations that mix cues up within tracks, but while I am generally not going to like Williams' choices, I will tend to be satisfied with Goldenthal's.

    So while the composer may have perfectly logical reasons for restructuring the score for it's respective album, the taste of the listener comes into play once they buy the record. Some people feel that there are some scores which are more linear in structure that are better served by a more chronological presentation; either way, the film order is the original default (not counting edits, retracking and whatnot) from which the listener may or may not choose to reprogram at their convenience.

    [Message edited by Swashbuckler on 06-16-2008]


    I agree with you about Williams, I loved his scores to Munich and Memoirs of a Geisha, and both CD's proved to be somewhat boring... I think Geisha may have even been in the film order.

    Another person who's CD's I think suck... Trevor Rabin. I like his music (not so much his recent stuff) but I am sorry, if you put the huge finale at the beginning of the CD and follow it with a bunch of short tracks, it proves to be a horrid listening experience. I think the only CD I thought was well done of his was Armageddon (which also had some "pacing" issues around track 12). Con Air doesn't count because that was with Mancina. But Mancina's Speed also bothers me, after about track 6, it gets boring.

    But to me, like his music or not, Zimmer's CD's are always very well done... Unless he chops off a giant theme that repeats throughout a film... like on Tears of the Sun.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-16-2008 02:19 PM PT (US)     

     sean
     Click Here to Email sean
     Standard Userer
     

    Hans Zimmer is a talented producer on his scores, no doubt about it; Tears Of The Sun is the major exception, though--it's in film order, minus a glaringly great theme Zimmer wrote for it (it appears once on album in muted performance).

    Williams, while providing usually seamless integrations of different cues for album release, makes this sometimes a frustrating listening experience: I'm talking specifically about the original Phantom Menace release, not the even more wretched "Ultimate Edition"; it omitted a major theme too, and many of the best action cues in the film--a horrendous mix.

    [Message edited by sean on 06-16-2008]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-16-2008 04:08 PM PT (US)     

     scoreguy16
     Click Here to Email scoreguy16
     Standard Userer
     

    I think Episode II & III had alright CD releases. Around the middle sections I seem to remember them getting boring though. And you're right about Tears of the Sun. Those tracks faded together and didn't really fit. I would've really changed the CD if I put it out. And it probably would've been around the same length, too, which is sad.

    Thomas Newman is an interesting case. I think a lot of his CD's are in the film's order and tend to flow fairly well, but suffer from short track syndrom.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-16-2008 05:37 PM PT (US)     

     Swashbuckler
     Click Here to Email Swashbuckler
     Standard Userer
     

    Actually, I think most of Newman's scores are not only edited but produced differently for the album. Some of his more traditional scores are presented somewhat more chronologically than the kinkier ones, but that is because he is developing themes over the course of the score.

    I like Newman as an album producer as well, and am usually satisfied with his records.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-16-2008 07:36 PM PT (US)     

     scoreguy16
     Click Here to Email scoreguy16
     Standard Userer
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by Swashbuckler:
    Actually, I think most of Newman's scores are not only edited but produced differently for the album. Some of his more traditional scores are presented somewhat more chronologically than the kinkier ones, but that is because he is developing themes over the course of the score.

    I like Newman as an album producer as well, and am usually satisfied with his records.


    I don't think I've ever been dissapointed with his CD's, it's just I wish some of his CD's had longer tracks. But I totally forgot about Road To Perdition and The Green Mile. The Green Mile was an excelent CD. You hear portions of themes throughout the CD and then most of the themes come together in Coffee On The Mile.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-16-2008 08:19 PM PT (US)     

     Cole
     Click Here to Email Cole
     Standard Userer
     

    I often go back and forth in my thinking of album vs. movie track order. I completely appreciate the reorganization to provide a better listening experience on the album. And most of the time on repeat listens that is what i choose. When I am "getting to know" the new music though I find it helpful to have a more chronological presentation - especially in a case where multi-themed music is developed over the course of a film. With KotKS I definitely want to see/hear how the Mutt theme emerges, develops and eventually merges with the Raiders March. The same idea goes for the Skull and Irina themes.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-17-2008 04:02 PM PT (US)     
     

    Old Infopop Software by UBB

    © 1998-2011, The MovieMusic Company