The MovieMusic Store shopping cart   |  sign in
    SEARCH  
  • Home
  • Browse Store
    • New Soundtrack CDs
    • Top Sellers
    • Low Price New CDs
    • Used CDs
    • Soundtrack Compilations
    • Score Composers
    • Soundtrack Labels
    • Soundtracks by Year
    • ... detailed search page
  • Store Info
    • Happy Customers!
    • $1 Shipping
    • Accepted Payment Methods
    • Safe Shopping Guarantee
    • Shipping Rates & Policies
    • Our Privacy Policy
    • About Us
  • Help Center
    • My Account
    • How to Order
    • Search Tips
    • Return/Refund Policy
    • Cancelling Your Order
    • Contact the Store
  • The Lobby
  •   Message Boards
      Movie Soundtracks
      Franz and Nutso Discuss the Cinema (2008) (Page 3)

    Archive of old forum. No more postings.

    Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.


    This topic is 3 pages long: 1 2 3
    Author
    Topic:   Franz and Nutso Discuss the Cinema (2008)

     nuts_score
     Click Here to Email nuts_score
     Standard Userer
     

    For some reason, I can't see any new posts as of recently. So whatever is being said, I hope it's nice.

    In other news: Michael, I wanted to apologize for a missed email from you on my part. I was searching through my old emails and stumbled across your's titled "Doomsday". That's quite a juicy bit of score info that you dropped me; and might I add how pissed I am about that? Had those events happened, now that would've been a score to rally behind. Instead . . . Tyler Bates?

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 03-27-2008 05:54 PM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     Click Here to Email franz_conrad
     Standard Userer
     

    I think whoever composed the film would have been encouraged to go down the 'John Carpenter' track, which most reviews of the Bates score mention.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 03-27-2008 06:16 PM PT (US)     

     nuts_score
     Click Here to Email nuts_score
     Standard Userer
     

    YAY! Finally I can see the rest of this.

    Thanks for the word on Daybreakers. Been looking forward to the film since it was announced (hopefully it will be what I Am Legend was supposed to be, at least that's what the Spierig brothers promised) and when Gordon was announced as composer I got even more excited (damn you Neil Marshall!). I hope that comes through well; I'm certainly envious of your trip to the sessions. Perhaps when I make a trip to Auckland (that's where you live, right?) you can invite me to lunch with Chris Gordon and we can eat some dingo.

    And you just now saw Fellini's La Dolce Vita?! You sure are slow . . . you've at least seen Juliet of the Spirits and Nights of Cabiria, right? What about 8 1/2? That's the one in black and white? Is that too boring for you? Or maybe it's the fact you have to read the subtitles? I know that can be hard but with practice I think we can shape you up nicely.

    Oh, and The reason why Fellini is glad to be dead.

    And again, he gets to spend unlimited time with Giulietta, that lucky bastard.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 03-27-2008 10:01 PM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     Click Here to Email franz_conrad
     Standard Userer
     

    I have seen NIGHTS OF CABIRIA, I VITELLONI, JULIET OF THE SPIRITS and of course, LA DOLCE VITA. CABIRIA and DOLCE VITA are the favourites to date.

    I haven't yet seen LA STRADA, AMARCORD, and 8 1/2. Gold left buried in the ground for now - there's a lot to catch up on with other directors too.

    I'm afraid you might have a little trouble finding me in Auckland. Head for the nearest capital city though and you should reach Sydney soon enough.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 03-27-2008 10:19 PM PT (US)     

     nuts_score
     Click Here to Email nuts_score
     Standard Userer
     

    Michael, I have some tremendous news for you and Sean and myself and anyone else that calls themselves a Terrence Malick fan:

    Today, I received a call from a high school friend who's currently attending the Westwood College of Aviation in Houston, Texas. Back in high school, we would often talk about films and I introduced him to Malick's film by showing him The Thin Red Line (he's a big war movie buff). Before he called this morning, I hadn't talked with him in a little over a year, so it was refreshing to chat about what had been happening in our lives. What he mainly called to tell me about was the fact that he had just auditioned for an extras role in a film called Tree of Life, which was shooting in nearby Matagorda County (a very small, almost non-existent county, he says). He knew that my reaction was going to be speechless, because I always look forward to Malick's new projects and I had absolutely no idea that this was filming already (but he thought he had the upper hand in assuming I hadn't heard of it yet). He said he remembered the director's name and he wanted to audition for my sake (drop me some inside stories, etc.) but unfortunately he wasn't quite what they were looking for. I said that was too bad but at least we can look forward to the film and then we went on with our other discussion (he's not a huge movie fan).

    So I just thought I'd let you know that Tree of Life is officially underway with Brad Pitt and Sean Penn as the only announced cast, and it's filming in Texas as of now. It would have been great if I were in my friends shoes, because as Clooney once said in regards to his limited screen time in TTRL, "I would haul a tri=pod across a whole country just to work with Malick."

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 03-29-2008 08:30 PM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     Click Here to Email franz_conrad
     Standard Userer
     

    Good news indeed. I was afraid that the zero awards performance of THE NEW WORLD and pulling out of the Che Guevara film at the last minute may have hurt Malick's standing with Hollywood central, barring more of his iconic ambitious projects. Fingers crossed for this one.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 03-30-2008 04:17 PM PT (US)     

     nuts_score
     Click Here to Email nuts_score
     Standard Userer
     

    Hell, if it's already begun filming, those fingers can be un-crossed. Now we just have to cross them in hopes that no one undermines his vision. Anyway, I found this interesting bit in a Cinematical online article. I thought Malick had abandoned all of his work on the project formerly known asQ:

    "As I said, little is known about the film. The Hollywood Reporter mentions the usual "plot is closely guarded" irritant, and to rub in the annoyance tells us an insider could only say that it's a "complex drama." According to a bit of trivia on the IMDb, Tree of Life actually originated in the summer of 1978, when Malick began working on the project, which was then titled Q. Considered his most ambitious project, Q was originally a multi-character story set in the Middle East during World War I, but it also featured a prehistoric prologue with a Minotaur. Then, by the end of the year, the prologue became the whole film. Like The Fountain, it seems like the plot took place over a long, long time. Unfortunately, in 1979 the director and Paramount apparently had a falling out about money; after that Malick disappeared for twenty years."



    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 03-30-2008 05:34 PM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     Click Here to Email franz_conrad
     Standard Userer
     

    WAGES OF FEAR is one top film. Definitely one of the best suspense thrillers I've seen.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 03-31-2008 04:26 PM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     Click Here to Email franz_conrad
     Standard Userer
     

    You've already seen my thoughts on BEFORE THE DEVIL KNOWS YOU'RE DEAD over Fsm. I didn't have any problems with the way it was made or anything, but I found it one of less satisfying experiences I've had recently at the movies.

    Little wonder though, given that my recent viewing on DVD has outclassed just about anything I've seen in cinemas since THE NEW WORLD. Some of the films I've only just seen for the first time include:

    - The Wages of Fear (Clouzot)
    - After Life (Koreeda)
    - Ordete (Dreyer)
    - Metropolis (Lang)
    - Ten (Kiarostami)
    - The Sand Pebbles (Wise)
    They all pretty much get the thumbs up from me, to varying degrees.

    One which didn't get the thumbs up was Richard Attenborough's MAGIC, despite having a superb Jerry Goldsmith score. I wish I hadn't bought it.

    Re-viewings include:
    - The Magnificent Ambersons (even in this form, still one of the best films Welles ever made, and one of the best American films of the 40s. Herrmann's score was over half-deleted from the film, but it is also a very fine effort.)
    - The Lady from Shanghai (cries out for a re-score and re-mix - and a restoration of the 70 missing minutes - but all that aside, there's a lot of fun to be had here from Welles' contribution to the noir genre)
    - Touch of Evil (ah! a Welles film that can be seen in a relatively close approximation of his intentions! So good!)
    - The Testament of Dr Mabuse (one of the best concepts for a sequel ever... a chilling story indeed)
    - Shanghai Triad (one of Zhang Yimou's most underrated films, with a nice indirect narrative perspective on the jostling for power within the gang culture of 1930s Shanghai. Very effective sound design and photography.)
    - Hitchcock's remake of his own The Man Who Knew Too Much. No film ever had a musical setpiece as good as this one.

    Soon up for a re-viewing is the Criterion Collection release of Welles' MR ARKADIN, which will be a pleasure, I'm sure. Also up for a first viewing: ARMY OF SHADOWS, DEAD OF NIGHT, SHORT FILM ABOUT LOVE, CLOSELY OBSERVED TRAINS and PRINCE OF THE CITY. The feast will continue.

    [Message edited by franz_conrad on 04-14-2008]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-14-2008 10:17 PM PT (US)     

     nuts_score
     Click Here to Email nuts_score
     Standard Userer
     

    Army of Shadows = Pure, unbridled Melville. This isn't your first, right? If so, hold off and get to know his filmography a little more. This is one of the best films ever made, it's just waiting to be admitted.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-15-2008 12:08 AM PT (US)     

     nuts_score
     Click Here to Email nuts_score
     Standard Userer
     

    I rented Lumet's Before the Devil Knows You're Dead tonight, I'll be watching it tomorrow. After that, it's just YWY that needs my attention before I can revise my favorite films of '07.

    Until then, true believers, huzzah!

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 04-15-2008 09:50 PM PT (US)     

     nuts_score
     Click Here to Email nuts_score
     Standard Userer
     

    So I've watched Youth Without Youth once now, and I'm up for a second viewing tomorrow. After which, I'll have a lengthy meditation on the film (I did love it, but this is a main course that I need seconds) and I'll come back here with a review (as well as reviews of I'm Not There, Before the Devil Knows You're Dead, and Margot at the Wedding) and a revisit through my "new" fifteen favorite of '07 (which was, by and by, the best year for cinema since 1999).

    Huzzah!

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-19-2008 06:45 PM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     Click Here to Email franz_conrad
     Standard Userer
     

    What was so good about 1999 again? Like everyone else, it was possessed of a shimmering gleam in my mind. But the other day I was thinking about it, and that gleam was less than obvious.

    The classics in American film that year were THE INSIDER and EYES WIDE SHUT.

    The very good American films were MALKOVITCH, BRINGING OUT THE DEAD, RIPLEY, FIGHT CLUB and RUSHMORE. I'd like to see LIMBO again, but from memory it was also very good. But with those being the key films of the year, it doesn't seem like the year was THAT revolutionary.

    There are others that got a lot of acclaim, but none really struck a chord with me then or since - MAGNOLIA, THREE KINGS, SUMMER OF SAM all come to mind.

    There are certainly some high points in the international cinema though - Bertolucci's BESIEGED is great, Miyazaki's MONONOKE, Denis' BEAU TRAVAIL, Koreeda's AFTER LIFE. I wasn't that much of a fan of ALL ABOUT MY MOTHER, but I should watch it a second time.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-19-2008 07:48 PM PT (US)     

     nuts_score
     Click Here to Email nuts_score
     Standard Userer
     

    Honestly, you just answered your own question. :rollseyes:

    Also to be included are Rosetta, American Beauty, and Being John Malkovich. And for what their worth, The Matrix, The Sixth Sense, and The Blair Witch Project (but don't hold this as a consideration that those are BUT decent films that impacted cinema in the years that followed).

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-19-2008 11:25 PM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     Click Here to Email franz_conrad
     Standard Userer
     

    I did list MALKOVITCH.

    AMERICAN BEAUTY has lost a bit of its lustre since then. It was good, but perhaps everyone got a teensy-bit carried away. The more recent LITTLE CHILDREN will be the suburban study that is respected more in the years to come, I suspect.

    Admittedly THE SIXTH SENSE and THE MATRIX are high quality blockbusters, and it would be rare to find two on a list in any given year since 1990, but they don't feel like they can quite breathe up there with EYES WIDE SHUT, AFTER LIFE and others.

    And remember, I don't actually think MAGNOLIA, THREE KINGS and SUMMER OF SAM are that good.

    My point is that there must be 10 films there at most, and while a few of them are masterpieces... was it that much of a landslide? Is there really no year since then that matches it?

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-20-2008 01:02 AM PT (US)     

     nuts_score
     Click Here to Email nuts_score
     Standard Userer
     

    Nope.

    And Little Children better than American Beauty?! Hahahaha. Well, I don't think so at least.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-20-2008 02:44 PM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     Click Here to Email franz_conrad
     Standard Userer
     

    LITTLE CHILDREN is MUCH better than AMERICAN BEAUTY.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-20-2008 05:01 PM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     Click Here to Email franz_conrad
     Standard Userer
     

    Just to take a year not long before 2007, I thought 2005 was an exceptional year for cinema... and these films are listed in no particular order...

    CACHE (Haneke)
    THE NEW WORLD (Malick)
    GOOD NIGHT, AND GOOD LUCK (Clooney - now there's something I never thought I'd say!)
    NOBODY KNOWS (Koreeda)
    THE PROPOSITION (Hillcoat, australian release)
    MUNICH (Spielberg's best in years)
    SYRIANA (a wonderful film, though a little rushed in parts)
    SARABAND (Bergman, though this release was delayed from late 2003)
    THE SQUID AND THE WHALE (Baumbach - easily his best film)
    DE BATTRE MON COEUR S'EST ARRETE (Audiard)
    GRIZZLY MAN (Herzog)
    TOUCHING THE SOUND (Riedelsheimer)

    And even the imperfect ones are pretty good - THE CONSTANT GARDENER, ENDURING LOVE and HISTORY OF VIOLENCE both come to mind.

    There were also quite a few films that got their American premiere in 2005 which were superb -
    2046 (Wong Kar Wai)
    THE WORLD (Zhang Jia Ke)
    OLDBOY (Park)
    HOWL'S MOVING CASTLE (Mirazaki)
    ... all of them worthy of a top 10 list from that year.

    Are you sure 2007 and 1999 stand head-and-shoulders above all of that? Because I sure ain't. True, the 2-3 best films in those years are towering... but not that towering.

    EDIT - And I forgot Winterbottom's TRISTRAM SHANDY: A COCK AND BULL STORY and Tommy Lee Jones's THREE BURIALS OF MELQUIADES ESTRADA! For shame!

    [Message edited by franz_conrad on 05-20-2008]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-20-2008 05:17 PM PT (US)     

     nuts_score
     Click Here to Email nuts_score
     Standard Userer
     

    Okay, okay, so '05 was a pretty nice year and most of those I prefer over some '99 ones.

    What else do you have to prove to me?!

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-21-2008 11:02 AM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     Click Here to Email franz_conrad
     Standard Userer
     

    My next project will be to prove that e is indeed equal to mc-squared.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-21-2008 03:12 PM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     Click Here to Email franz_conrad
     Standard Userer
     

    Well the Sydney Film Festival has begun...

    I saw a film last night called 'Silent Light', from a Mexican director called Carlos Reygadas. Film with a very gradual pace... using non-professional actors, set in the Dutch-speaking Mennonite community in Mexico.

    Influences were high prestige indeed. There were shots where he was clearly trying to capture that Tarkovsky sense of rhythm. (The two shots that open and close the film are marvelous indeed.) The actors do not emote much at all - the film is very much a study in their faces, and in ways it brought Bresson (non-professionals) and Dreyer (use of the face) to mind. The Dreyer influence runs a lot deeper. As the film draws to its end, it's increasingly clear that the director is going to restage the ending of Dreyer's Ordete, which he proceeds to do. (The main character of the film also shares his name with a key character in the Dreyer film.)

    The technical aspects of the film were very commendable. No music (beyond two radios) was a sound choice - and the sound work was very strong in its careful construction. The camera work - which seems to use rely natural light and practicals - is commendable. That emphasis on natural light is probably the 'silent light' referred to in the title. (This makes an interesting contrast with Dreyer's Ordete, where constructed lighting of characters often externalises their internal state. Reygadas seems to be looking for something more naturalistic.)

    It all sounds very good, but I must confess I didn't really like it. I couldn't stop thinking about this film and feel it. And for me, the performances, especially in moments of dialogue, were what kept me out of it. The three central characters had moments which were strong, particularly the characters of Esther (protagonist's wife) and Marianne (protagonist's lover). For all supporting characters and extras, I felt the director's instructions prompting them to action off-camera. (It doesn't help that many of the supporting character glance towards the camera late in the film.) This even happened with the main character - who is clearly receiving instruction to drive his car round in one-more-circle in a scene that comes relatively early in the film.

    The problem with dialogue was not entirely the flat delivery. The content of what these characters were speaking - or at least the subtitled translation of it - mystified me, as characters point out what they're doing even as they do it. It made the film feel to me like a parody of a Bresson film in parts.

    That same issue w/ the performances, of feeling the director at the edge of the frame, also bothered me with the way some scenes were blocked. Some were very precise and effective, with imperceptible zooms and tracks changing our perspective without us realising it. An example of the sort of thing that bothered me is the scene quite early where the main character is left alone at his dinner table, and begins to cry. The camera begins moving after he begins to cry, and quite noticably - a very naked gesture that distanced me from the emotional man we were meant to be moving closer to. There are some very unusual transitions between tripod and handheld also within scenes, and the screen direction is all over the place in some. (The film doesn't use close ups as often and exclusively as Dreyer's Passion of Joan of Arc for spatial issues to be irrelevant. It's caught in a tense place where spatial orientation is manipulated often enough to matter.)

    Quite possibly I've missed the point, and any fan of the film (it seems there are many) will probably insist that I have when I say that the film could have been shorter. Loose-ends bookend so many of the scenes that only a few scenes feel like they emerge out of the preceding one, and that's not a mistake that Tarkovsky would have made. (One shot early in the film - a wide angle of a truck driving down a road - seems to be sending out an early warning signal of what is to come by holding a shot well past the point when the cinematographer's showreel would have cut it.)

    Overall, an interesting halfway house between a very ascetic, naturalistic cinema, and a very constructed formal world. I just wish it had engaged me.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-05-2008 08:54 PM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     Click Here to Email franz_conrad
     Standard Userer
     

    The festival has mostly been very good since SILENT LIGHT...

    So far I've seen:

    - Terence Davies' OF TIME AND THE CITY
    - Werner Herzog's ENCOUNTERS AT THE END OF THE WORLD
    - Alexander Sokurov's ALEXANDRA

    Another recent excellent cinema experience was Fatih Akin's THE EDGE OF HEAVEN. And on dvd the other night, I saw Bergman's PERSONA, which is remarkable.

    Still ahead of me at the festival:
    - Powell and Pressburger's classics THE LIFE AND DEATH OF COLONEL BLIMP and BLACK NARCISSUS
    - The classic 'Turn of the Screw' adaptation - THE INNOCENTS
    - Errol Morris's STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
    - Zhang Jia Ke's WU YONG (USELESS) - Especially looking forward to this one.
    - Claude Chabrol's recent GIRL CUT IN TWO
    - A Japanese silent film called PAGE OF MADNESS.

    There is also a film by Taiwanese master Hou Hsiao Hsien floating around Sydney cinemas at the moment - FLIGHT OF THE RED BALLOON. It's a shame distributors picked this time of year to put it out. Hopefully it will hang on for another week or two.

    All of this may sound extremely pretentious and arty, but what I'm liking about a lot of these films is that they're just so engaging. Not all of them are great - SILENT LIGHT was a real chore for me - but nearly all of them will stick in my memory for a while. And looking at the list of films I'm meant to be excited about later this year, I'll take any chance I can to see a film that's good enough to play at a festival on the other side of the world but uncommercial enough for most people to have never heard of it.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-08-2008 05:05 AM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     Click Here to Email franz_conrad
     Standard Userer
     

    Nuts, what happened to the bit where we actually discuss cinema?

    Have you seen Powell and Pressburger's LIFE AND DEATH OF COLONEL BLIMP? What a knockout of a film! And Deborah Kerr's performance ---

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-09-2008 05:09 AM PT (US)     

     sean
     Click Here to Email sean
     Standard Userer
     

    Hey, Michael, I worked at the Adelaide Film Festival!

    By the way, have you seen The Unknown Woman? I thought it was quite excellent. Just caught it at work last night. Ennio's score is absolutely incredible: I had no idea he scored it, but when a certain theme came up I thought it was either him hands-down-no-questions, or some other Italian composer trying his/her darndest to sound like the master; alas the end credits confirmed my suspicion--the posters we got had no composer listing.

    [Message edited by sean on 06-09-2008]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-09-2008 05:48 PM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     Click Here to Email franz_conrad
     Standard Userer
     

    I really like the score of that film, but to my knowledge the film has not screened in Sydney. I would like to see it, as Ennio's music was striking (as it so often is).

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-09-2008 06:10 PM PT (US)     

     sean
     Click Here to Email sean
     Standard Userer
     

    Originally posted by franz_conrad:
    I really like the score of that film, but to my knowledge the film has not screened in Sydney. I would like to see it, as Ennio's music was striking (as it so often is).

    Not to say anything of his age, but I was shocked by what he achieved with this score at this point in his career; it's a complex and compelling work. Fortunately, in the film, it's mixed loud and plays a major role... especially the lullaby: Which, when I had first seen the trailers we had, thought it sounded like something close to what Jerry Goldsmith might compose. The "horror" elements strangely make me appreciate what Zimmer was doing with Hannibal a lot more during the earlier Italian-set scenes... I see what he was going for, taking more than a few nods from his favourite composer. Anyway, I highly recommend the film, Michael, it's definitely up yours, Andrew's, and my alley.

    [Message edited by sean on 06-10-2008]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-10-2008 12:14 PM PT (US)     

     nuts_score
     Click Here to Email nuts_score
     Standard Userer
     

    Sorry sorry sorry Michael! I've been piecing together some reviews of Before the Devil Knows You're Dead, I'm Not There, and Youth Without Youth while I've been dodging the summer fare at the cinemas in favor of the better, smaller stuff; so I'm also hitting up reviews of Young @ Heart and Tarsem Singh's The Fall (which, by all accounts, would be a shame if it didn't come to Aus). I'm also working on a write-up about a new film score from musician Mike Patton (his first) so that I can drum up interest amongst the film score fans. All of this on top of working long hours and juggling the move to a new apartment.

    Your reporting thus far is superb, and I can't wait to dig into all of it. I'll be honest and say that I've only just skimmed past until I saw Herzog's name. So, you must tell me: how was Encounters? I don't think I'll be expecting much, because I don't know what kind of feeling the mad German had in making this anti-March of the Penguins docu; but I can't say I'm not mildly interested.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-11-2008 12:07 AM PT (US)     

     sean
     Click Here to Email sean
     Standard Userer
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by nuts_score:
    Sorry sorry sorry Michael! I've been piecing together some reviews of Before the Devil Knows You're Dead, I'm Not There, and Youth Without Youth while I've been dodging the summer fare at the cinemas in favor of the better, smaller stuff;

    HAHA! Those are all terrible movies, you goofball. Marisa Tomei was naked in Devil; I'm Not There was boring and useless, particularly if you like Dylan at all; and Coppola's one made me wanna' shoot myself. :P


    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-11-2008 12:11 AM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     Click Here to Email franz_conrad
     Standard Userer
     

    I really hated the experience of watching BEFORE THE DEVIL KNOWS YOU'RE DEAD, but I'm keen to see YOUTH WITHOUT YOUTH at some point.

    I can add to the list of what I've seen in the last couple of weeks the latest Errol Morris film, STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. As in FOG OF WAR, Morris opens the door to a new perspective on things I thought I knew something about. Recommended.

    On the Herzog film, it's actually genuinely good, and worth a cinema perspective. Filled with Herzogian touches, and to be honest, it's about much more than RESCUE DAWN was. The people he encounters at the end of the world are what gives the film its heart and title. For visual bravura, it's mostly the underwater diving sequences that stand out. I'm glad I saw it on a big screen in a receptive crowd. Very funny in parts.

    Next up: Zhang Jia-Ke's USELESS this afternoon.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-11-2008 07:47 PM PT (US)     

     nuts_score
     Click Here to Email nuts_score
     Standard Userer
     

    A Herzog movie that's funny in parts? That's insane! You must be joking?!

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-12-2008 05:36 PM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     Click Here to Email franz_conrad
     Standard Userer
     

    USELESS (WU YONG) was ok, but wasn't exactly gripping. It was interesting to watch a documentary of feature length with almost no narration to tell you what you're meant to be seeing. That's REALLY respecting an audience's intelligence... possibly a tad too much.

    THE INNOCENTS took me a little while to get into, but this classic Jack Clayton-helmed Henry James adaptation has some of the most authentically scary moments I've experienced in a cinema. And the thing is, what lies behind those moments is so simple and non-gratuitous. But you can't help but feel the charge that rips through the cinema at those moments. When I saw this film in high school, I thought of it as a story of possessed children. It's quite clear to me now that it's a story about a crazy governess with an over-active imagination.

    FLIGHT OF THE RED BALLOON - Hou Hsiao Hsien's homage to the classic RED BALLOON short is delightful. Wonderful acting, gorgeous imagery, and a wonderful solo piano score all add up to a really pleasant souffle of a film. Shame there was noone else in the cinema. (Or only two other people.)

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-15-2008 05:24 PM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     Click Here to Email franz_conrad
     Standard Userer
     

    So, what did I like this year?

    The cinema experiences I'm still thinking about (no clear ranking):

    - The Edge of Heaven (Fatih Akin)
    - Flight of the Red Balloon (Hou Hsiao Hsien)
    - Aleksandra (Alexander Sokurov)
    - The first half of WALL-E
    - There will be blood (Paul Thomas Anderson, which I really must see a second time, but time is short)
    - Hunger (Steve Mcqueen)
    - The Diving Bell and the Butterfly (Julian Schnabel)
    - Black Narcissus (Powell and Pressburger)
    - The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp (Powell and Pressburger)
    - The Innocents (Jack Clayton)
    - Ashes of Time: Redux (Wong Kar Wai)
    - Glass: A Portrait of Philip in 12 Parts (Scott Hicks)
    - Standard Operating Procedure (Errol Morris)
    - Of Time and the City (Terence Davies)
    - My Blueberry Nights (Wong Kar Wai)
    - The Dark Knight (Christopher Nolan)
    - We Own the Night (James Gray, just saw on dvd the other night, so this is not a cinema experience - an interesting companion film to Eastern Promises, and a stronger narrative experience for me)
    - The non-framing device parts of The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (David Fincher)
    - Encounters at the End of the World (Werner Herzog)

    If I had to single some out as the films that really wiped the floor with me, I'd name Flight of the Red Balloon, The Edge of Heaven, Aleksandra, Hunger, Of Time and the City, Ashes of Time: Redux, There will be Blood, Diving Bell and the Butterfly and Glass: A Portrait of Philip in 12 Parts.

    Mind you, the strongest experience I had in a dark room with strangers this year was not a film, but a play. Complicite's A DISAPPEARING NUMBER really struck a chord with me. If you ever have a chance to see a Complicite production, be there.

    Most Disappointing? (Compared to their potential.)
    - Quantum of Solace (Marc Forster)
    - Youth without Youth (Francis Ford Coppola)
    - technically one of last year's - Golden Compass (Chris Weitz)

    Negative experiences:
    - The New Babylon (one of the more dubious classics I've seen - with a live orchestra performing Shostakovitch's score)
    - Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (Lucas & Spielberg could get anything made between them, and they did this - let the record show this)
    - Silent Light (Carlos Reygadas is set to be a new darling of the arthouse, bringing together Tarkovsky, Bresson and particularly in this film, Dreyer. I'm pretty suspicious though. This film was an incredibly irritating cinema experience.)
    - Before the Devil Knows You're Dead (it's no reflection on how well made this film is that I hated it. But I did hate watching it, and can't ignore that)
    - Useless / Wuyong (Zhang Jia Ke's films are normally very strong... I think this subject was not as absorbing as he thought it was)
    - Australia (roughly what I expected. I didn't hate it though, which is not what I expected)

    Missed (because you can't see everything)... In Bruges, Burn after Reading, Princess of Nebraska, Happy Go Lucky, doubtless there were many others.

    And there were other films as well that I was neither for nor against... Body of Lies, Un Secret, The Orphanage, The Girl Cut in Two, and there were others, Man on wire (which was pretty good, actually).

    [Message edited by franz_conrad on 12-29-2008]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-28-2008 03:07 PM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     Click Here to Email franz_conrad
     Standard Userer
     

    Let's change the thread title perhaps to something a bit more like 'Franz Discusses the Cinema (2008)'.

    Have also seen VICKY CRISTINA BARCELONA and FROST/NIXON since last report. The top-end of the list is well and truly safe, but I enjoyed both more than I expected to.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 01-06-2009 01:04 PM PT (US)     

     nuts_score
     Click Here to Email nuts_score
     Standard Userer
     

    I'm doing an essay this year, brother. It's taking me longer than expected. Plus, I'm seeing Doubt tonight so it will proper in the next few days.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 01-07-2009 04:15 PM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     Click Here to Email franz_conrad
     Standard Userer
     

    An essay, eh? Perhaps I should write a spoof Sight and Sound style article to wrap around my own selections above to match your prose.

    You'll notice I haven't seen Tarsem's THE FALL. It's my fault that I haven't seen a lot of good films this year, but that one isn't my fault. I have the DVD on order from the US, since it has received neither cinema nor dvd release here.

    Interested to hear whether you think DOUBT worthwhile. I am (as you know) suspicious of it.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 01-07-2009 04:28 PM PT (US)     

     nuts_score
     Click Here to Email nuts_score
     Standard Userer
     

    Just an update:

    I watched The Reader last week; and I'll be seeing The Wrestler and Revolutionary Road soon. By then, I think I'll be ready. Hopefully I can deliver something that's worth the wait.

    I also stumbled upon a -- ahem -- "copy" of Silent Light which I will be viewing in the next day or so. That's the one I'm looking forward to and I feel good that I was able to get it.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 01-21-2009 12:13 PM PT (US)     

     franz_conrad
     Click Here to Email franz_conrad
     Standard Userer
     

    It'd be a shame to watch SILENT LIGHT on anything other than a big screen. I didn't particularly like the film, but it was a film that used the big screen well.

    I have a couple more to watch myself, including SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE. So far my list hasn't changed this year. I'm hoping THE FALL will arrive soon in the post.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 01-21-2009 12:58 PM PT (US)     

     nuts_score
     Click Here to Email nuts_score
     Standard Userer
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by franz_conrad:
    It'd be a shame to watch SILENT LIGHT on anything other than a big screen. I didn't particularly like the film, but it was a film that used the big screen well.


    Trust me, the first place I want to watch any film is in a cinema, on a big screen, and with a paying audience. But Reygadas' film isn't coming to Atlanta.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 01-21-2009 07:39 PM PT (US)     
     

    Old Infopop Software by UBB

    © 1998-2011, The MovieMusic Company