-
Message Boards

Movie Soundtracks
buysoundtrax off the deep end? (Page 1)
Archive of old forum. No more postings.
Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.
This topic is 2 pages long: 1 2Author
Topic: buysoundtrax off the deep end?

Lancelot

Standard Userer

Forget Bruckheimer, forget Rabin for a moment--what the hell's up with this?NATIONAL TREASURE
Original Score
Music by Trevor Rabin
$59.95 ea.
OUT OF PRINT-ONE COPY AVAILABLE
I just checked Amazon, and they're selling it for $39.95, so maybe Buysoundtrax is on to something, here, but....seriously, what the hell? When did soundtrack collecting become Wonderland?You wonder why digital download is the next wave? Because of this kind of crap.
posted 01-26-2007 09:39 PM PT (US) 
tjguitar

Standard Userer

National Treasure is actually a pretty damn good score in my opinion. But I like a lot of Rabin.I got it after it went out of print on ebay from a canadian merchant for around $15-$20. The only thing I can guess is the printing run ended a bit later in Canada than here. I don't know.
Glad I got it when I did.posted 01-26-2007 10:06 PM PT (US) 
Squiddybop
Standard Userer

I couldn't stand the score in the film, but for people who do want it, it looks like it's still in print in Japan, so there's no good reason to spend $60 on it.http://www.cdjapan.co.jp/detailview.html?KEY=AVCW-12423
[Message edited by Squiddybop on 01-26-2007]
posted 01-26-2007 10:37 PM PT (US) 
tjguitar

Standard Userer

The only disappointments I had is they left out some of the best music, from the end of the movie.
posted 01-26-2007 11:04 PM PT (US) 
PeterK

FishChip

Either they've gone off the deep end long ago, or this is a standard practice. I say both! Expect anything else from moi?It could be Thaxton selling off remaining OOP copies for premium pricing because he's working on an expanded score for imminent release, like with Quigley Down Under and others. Phooey to insider trading in the soundtrack world! It's bad enough as it is in the corporate world.
They could have asked you to spend $300 first on other CDs so you could then "earn" the right to purchase it for $60! Eeek!
Time for me to go list a Die Hard soundtrack CD for $5,000 again. Gotta get it while I can.... because it might show up in iTunes next week for $9.99.
Have a good weekend, and spend your money wisely!
posted 01-26-2007 11:20 PM PT (US) 
tjguitar

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by PeterK:
Either they've gone off the deep end long ago, or this is a standard practice. I say both! Expect anything else from moi?It could be Thaxton selling off remaining OOP copies for premium pricing because he's working on an expanded score for imminent release, like with Quigley Down Under and others. Phooey to insider trading in the soundtrack world! It's bad enough as it is in the corporate world.
They could have asked you to spend $300 first on other CDs so you could then "earn" the right to purchase it for $60! Eeek!
Time for me to go list a Die Hard soundtrack CD for $5,000 again. Gotta get it while I can.... because it might show up in iTunes next week for $9.99.
Have a good weekend, and spend your money wisely!
I doubt National Treasure gets the expanded treatment anytime soon (but your response still made me chuckle)
Did anyone buy that CD you had listed for an absurd amount?
posted 01-26-2007 11:23 PM PT (US) 
PeterK

FishChip

Unfortunately... the answer is no. I expected it to fly off the shelf. Maybe I've gone off the deep end, or maybe I dove head first into the baby pool.
posted 01-26-2007 11:29 PM PT (US) 
Crono/Kyp

Standard Userer

It's all those drugs I give you boss :-)--Brian
NP: The Holiday
posted 01-26-2007 11:35 PM PT (US) 
nuts_score

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by PeterK:
Unfortunately... the answer is no. I expected it to fly off the shelf. Maybe I've gone off the deep end, or maybe I dove head first into the baby pool.So it's still for sale at that incredibly affordable price?
posted 01-27-2007 10:44 AM PT (US) 
tjguitar

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by PeterK:
Unfortunately... the answer is no. I expected it to fly off the shelf.Well....maybe you forgot to add the stipulation that the customer had to purchase an additional $14,246.42 in product just to have the opportunity to buy that incredibly rare cd for $4,999.99.
posted 01-27-2007 02:26 PM PT (US) 
John C Winfrey

Standard Userer

LOL. Incredible!!!!!!!!!!! This Cd can be picked up at just about every used Cd store in America for about 4 bucks and you can get the new copy in lots of the places too for about 10. WOW. J.
posted 01-27-2007 05:02 PM PT (US) 
tjguitar

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by John C Winfrey:
LOL. Incredible!!!!!!!!!!! This Cd can be picked up at just about every used Cd store in America for about 4 bucks and you can get the new copy in lots of the places too for about 10. WOW. J.Where the heck is there a used cd store with soundtracks for only 4 bucks?
posted 01-27-2007 06:19 PM PT (US) 
BMikeJ

Standard Userer

There isn't... At the Amoeba chain of stores, I do see soundtracks they are clearing out in this price range but they are often the usual suspects, bargain bin titles that you can find in every used bin and won't move at $9.99 so they are hoping they will disappear for 3 or 4 dollars...I just did a search on eBay for National Treasure...
One Canadian seller has it for auction and the current bid is $12.93.
There are three Buy It Nows that range from $40 to $40.99.There are three copies up on Amazon right now and the price range is from $35.56 to $60.95.
Are any of the other soundtrack speciality shops carrying this title?
No.
Peter, are you carrying it?
No?
Buysoundtrax's price for this does not seem outrageous to me... And no one is putting a gun to your head to pay that much money for a CD.
John Winfrey, sir... I would like to see you produce some of these used or new copies of National Treasure at the $4 or $10 price point you have seen them at. If you can find them that cheap, perhaps you may be able to sell them at a price of your choosing and make a little profit. It's the American way, after all... But watch out! People like Lance and Peter are always watching and always vigilant! You can't make too much profit or else...
What a load of bullsh*t... I see other specialty shops like Intrada and Screen Archives offering out of print titles for outrageous prices all the time and I rarely see any postings about it on any of the boards. But if Buysoundtrax does it... Oh, boy... Get the torches, get the pickforks... Get me a rope.
This thread is a reminder to me just what a graveyard this message board has become.
I remember when we actually had some filmmusic discussion going on in this place... Interesting people had something to say about the music they liked and they could express their opinions with a more than reasonable degree of comfort. Where have those people gone... Now all I see are old threads resurrected in the hopes of stimulating some discussion, Peter plugging the store or someone taking a shot at Buysoundtrax. And you, Peter, are always there to fan the flames for that.
Is this what passes for discussion here now?
posted 01-27-2007 09:12 PM PT (US) 
PeterK

FishChip

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. (Big hmm). I seem to remember a posting about Intrada's $50 Inner Circle, easily found online for $2, and multiple copies. Screen Archives? I remember a discussion about someone saving $200 if they shoped at half.com for the same "rare" items listed at SAE. And I am sure people all over the planet are complaining about the outrageous prices at MovieMusic.com. Of course, you won't see that kind of stuff on these boards because I am super insecure freak dude, so I censor the hell of out of it! But check FilmTracks, FSM, any forum you like... there's a huge anti-MM movement going on. But what can I say... it's good for business.BMikeJ, you iz being selective in your reaction, which is understandable and acceptable because your friends are the buysoundtrax guys. But to say only Buysoundtrax is picked on is completely false.
It's OK if people complain about how stores decide to do business. It's normal. Brutha's gonna work it out.
posted 01-27-2007 09:59 PM PT (US) 
PeterK

FishChip

And Mike, I say it straight:This whole play about how this place sucks because there's no good discussion (especially from someone who hasn't tried contributing whatever they may consider good discussion) is boring. Old turds that don't even smell anymore until you hit them with the lawnmower.
Yeah, I am not a fan of the revived Zimmerito thread, but the only post you made this week... was a non-sequitor to that thread. So, if things suck around here, you can thank this kind of contribution!
I say it frankly, not with hatred or hopes that you'll come back after vowing to never post here again. You can do what you want, but we all gotta face truth. I say forget about it all and get back to film music discussion. Yeah, that's what I say.
Am I really flooding the forum with MovieMusic Store promos? If I'm not mistaken, I link to pre-orders when they are available. It's like a time-saver so I won't have to answer a bunch of emails asking about when it will be ready for pre-order! But, you're right. The emails still come in, and the post could be totally useless for someone. But I'll still do it. I apologize if it bothers you, and anyone else.
[Message edited by PeterK on 01-27-2007]
posted 01-27-2007 10:07 PM PT (US) 
tjguitar

Standard Userer

Yeah, I'm amazed at the huge amount of Anti-MovieMusic crowd that goes on at certain forums I've had nothing but good times come from Peter and MM.com. Saved a lot of money too. Intrada seems like cool guys but they are based here in CA and charge sales tax, I like them, but not enough to warrant paying an extra 8%. Ive ordered from SAE too, and no problems there, but they charge some pretty outrageous prices for used cds. I mean $50 for First Knight? Cmon. I got it for a few bucks at half a year ago.Peter~~~Did you hit Thaxton's dog with a car or something when you lived in LA? I swaer the guy thinks your Satan's Spawn!
posted 01-27-2007 10:15 PM PT (US) 
PeterK

FishChip

Actually, all I can remember was a computer glitch in some system that had the ultra-rare Blood In, Blood Out CD set for release in '97 or '98. I passed along the news to various forums. Ford outed me and said it was a bunch of blarney (not exactly his words) and demanded restitution like some 5-star Army general. I never did and paid the price... and still paying the price? I dunno. I've mostly forgotten about it and things have been great.But yes, I love to joke about funny things. All hell breaks loose when it's about certain individuals, although my jokes are no different than they would be had it been about something else. But whatever.
Mike, I agree, I am tired of this thread. Do you have any favorite recent modern scores? I'll see you over on in this thread:
http://www.moviemusic.com/mb/Forum1/HTML/015429.htmlposted 01-27-2007 10:26 PM PT (US) 
PeterK

FishChip

Argh, dammit. Someone just complained about the Geppetto TV soundtrack in the MovieMusic Store!!Dammit!!!!!
posted 01-27-2007 10:35 PM PT (US) 
BMikeJ

Standard Userer

I gave up trying to stimulate discussion around here a long time ago, mostly because the people that I liked to talk with no longer post on this board. I post here on occasion but I do the majority of my posting on another board.
And, from what I've seen, there hasn't been a lot of anti-Moviemusic bashing. You provide good service and I will tell that to any person that asks me that.
posted 01-27-2007 10:35 PM PT (US) 
tjguitar

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by BMikeJ:
And, from what I've seen, there hasn't been a lot of anti-Moviemusic bashing. You provide good service and I will tell that to any person that asks me that.Not so much lately, but there was, espeically by Ford Thaxton. If you disagree with Mr. Thaxton over something its basically "you associate with Peter Kelly, so your opinion doesn't count" not in those words.
You'd think I joined the KK or the Nazis.

I love alot of CDs that Mr. Thaxton produces, and he's a pretty knowledgeable guy about soundtracks in general, but man, he gets a HUGE temper and can be a little odd sometimes.
But I guess we all do...he just stands out cause he freaks out on people so much, I don't know.posted 01-27-2007 10:39 PM PT (US) 
PeterK

FishChip

quote:
Originally posted by BMikeJ:
I gave up trying to stimulate discussion around here a long time ago, mostly because the people that I liked to talk with no longer post on this board.I'm not sure... is this meant as an insult to those who are still here? Because there are many here who make good discussion. But if it's more about those who you discuss with rather than the discussion itself, it's really unfair to say what you did about the quality of the discussion here.
Since this can be interpreted as a insult to those who are here, I have a responsibility to support everyone here who contributes good discussion.
And now my responsibilities are outta the way... I'm gonna go eat a donut.
posted 01-27-2007 11:02 PM PT (US) 
BMikeJ

Standard Userer

Peter, don't put words in my mouth. If I'm going to insult someone, I will come out and do so.
posted 01-27-2007 11:35 PM PT (US) 
BMikeJ

Standard Userer

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=1 face=arial>quote:</font><HR size=1>Originally posted by tjguitar:
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=1 face=arial>quote:</font><HR size=1>
Not so much lately, but there was, espeically by Ford Thaxton. If you disagree with Mr. Thaxton over something its basically "you associate with Peter Kelly, so your opinion doesn't count" not in those words.You'd think I joined the KK or the Nazis.

I love alot of CDs that Mr. Thaxton produces, and he's a pretty knowledgeable guy about soundtracks in general, but man, he gets a HUGE temper and can be a little odd sometimes.
But I guess we all do...he just stands out cause he freaks out on people so much, I don't know.<HR size=1></BLOCKQUOTE>And, yet, I don't recall seeing a recent post where Ford has mentioned Peter Kelly or Moviemusic in any capacity. But Peter mentions him alot around here... especially because it's the only place Peter can talk about him without expecting a response of any kind, since Peter has locked him out of the board.
Maybe none of this would make much of a difference if Peter didn't have a business to run. It's pretty easy to slag competition in a place where they can't respond in kind.
[Message edited by BMikeJ on 01-27-2007]
posted 01-27-2007 11:45 PM PT (US) 
tjguitar

Standard Userer

quote:
And, yet, I don't recall seeing a recent post where Ford has mentioned Peter Kelly or Moviemusic in any capacityI don't know how long ago it was, but it was in the past year, I don't even remember what it was about or who it was directed at (it wasn't me). Perhaps over the BSX inchon fiasco, i'm not sure.
posted 01-28-2007 12:38 AM PT (US) 
tjguitar

Standard Userer

nevermind...[Message edited by tjguitar on 01-28-2007]
posted 01-28-2007 12:40 AM PT (US) 
PeterK

FishChip

Mike, I asked a question. Vague answer still leaves me uncertain by what you meant. And please stop the whole Ford nonsense. I talk about a lot of people, so mow this turd already.
posted 01-28-2007 12:41 AM PT (US) 
BMikeJ

Standard Userer

What question are you referring to, Peter? Are you trying to instigate something? I expressed my opinion and you can take it any you want to.And the "Ford thing" is not going to go away, especially since you bring it up so often here.
[Message edited by BMikeJ on 01-28-2007]
posted 01-28-2007 12:42 AM PT (US) 
PeterK

FishChip

Am I trying to instigate? Woah down, please. I just want clarification. Here's your question, unedited, unadulterated, uneverythinginated, from above:quote:
Originally posted by PeterK:
I'm not sure... is this meant as an insult to those who are still here?Your comments in light what you said about this place sucking because the friends you like no longer post here were unclear. So...
posted 01-28-2007 12:44 AM PT (US) 
PeterK

FishChip

Anyway, in hopes of ending this, I will assume you mean this place sucks because your friends no longer post here, not because the discussions suck. That's how I'll take it.Not a problem.
posted 01-28-2007 12:47 AM PT (US) 
BMikeJ

Standard Userer

The words "this place sucks" have not been uttered by me.I was commenting on the quality of discussion on the board these days. There just has to be something better to talk about than another "bash Buysoundtrax" thread. And nobody has commented on what I wrote about the pricing of National Treasure on other sites. I don't think Buysoundtrax is being too outrageous with their pricing on this title.
posted 01-28-2007 12:59 AM PT (US) 
Stargate

Standard Userer

I would never pay $60 for "National Treasure"... it's not even that good of a score.
posted 01-28-2007 07:53 AM PT (US) 
tjguitar

Standard Userer

quote:
. I don't think Buysoundtrax is being too outrageous with their pricing on this title.I don't think so either. The CD seems to be pretty damn rare. I'm not sure why they stopped printing it so soon...that's certainly not BSX's fault.
posted 01-28-2007 09:54 AM PT (US) 
MarkA

Standard Userer

For what it's worth, this forum doesn't hold exclusivity in its bashing of buysoundtrax. It seems to be a universal phenomenon, especially prominent at filmscoremonthly but pervasive among a lot of internet-based film score collectors. I too find it strange that no one bashes Intrada for their high priced "One of a Kind" list or Screenarchives for their high priced out of print list.
posted 01-28-2007 02:32 PM PT (US) 
MWRuger

Standard Userer

It's more than I would pay for it but it doesn't seem out of line. As others have pointed out many sites have over priced used soundtracks.You should always do your research before buying.
I'm not shy about things I think are unfair and you can be sure that if I thought this needed discussion before now I would have.
But since you specifically asked for replies, you have them.
The problems that I have had with Buysoundtrax are basically about the way they do business, not pricing ones. When they do something I think is wrong or unfair I post about it. When they do right (in my view) I also post my support.
I have ordered from them once, they were a little slow but they came through just fine. But following the Inchon debate and how they dealt with a poster here and considering my criticism of their policies, I don't feel like I can trust them not to have problems with my order.
So when Lifeforce came out I ordered from elsewhere at a higher price. If I had more money I would buy more of their releases, as I have never had a problem with the way the music sounds but I will always buy from someone else.
The thing is I don't understand why you guys (BSX) respond to these kinds of posts in the first place. It almost never makes it better. It either turns to acrimonious debate or he said/she said pointlessness. You are never going to convince those who don’t like BSX and arguing with them just makes it seem like maybe they have a point. Even if you win, you lose.
You and all those guys at BSX should take a vow to stop debating this kind of thing and just reply to questions about the score releases. You may not think it’s fair, but you guys are not helping yourselves by defending every business decision publicly.
You don’t see Intrada or SAE arguing with their customers about this kind of crap. Correcting errors of fact is fine but debating the how and the why of the way you do business is a very bad idea. Maybe if you stopped responding to every slight, real or perceived, people would stop complaining in public about your customer service.
You guys are doing yourself a real disservice arguing with your customers in public.
[Message edited by MWRuger on 01-28-2007]
posted 01-28-2007 02:36 PM PT (US) 
BMikeJ

Standard Userer

Who is "you guys"?I'm no mouthpiece for BSX, if that's what you're saying. They happen to be friends, as Peter said, and I occasionally help out with a project.
I would apply the same words to any of the speciality shops and I have done so in the past, in other threads...
I've worked at one of these shops and I know Doug, Jeff, Roger at Intrada and Craig at SAE and I know what they have to deal with on a daily basis because I've done it myself.
Frequently, these dustups that you are referring to end up starting because people like to have something to talk about... It rarely occurs to anyone who starts one of these bash <insert speciality shop> threads to pick up a telephone and call the other party to try and resolve an issue. I know this because I have been witness to it.
But you are probably right... It would be better not to address these sorts of things in public, on a message board because it really doesn't make much of a difference in the long run. There are always going to be people out there with an axe to grind in one hand and a fistful of sour grapes in the other.
And it ultimately doesn't matter what gets written on these boards about a particular label or shop because most of the business tends to come from people that don't post on the boards and it's usually just the same vocal minority chiming in.
For every customer that pops up and complains about their order and the conspiracy to steal their hard money and buy pretty ponies with it, there are hundreds, if not thousands, of satisfied customers that you never hear about because they don't post on a message board. The ultimate arbiter of these matters is commerce.
posted 01-28-2007 03:14 PM PT (US) 
MWRuger

Standard Userer

Fair enough, I take you at your word.The reason that I thought you might be a spokesperson for them is because on every thread that involves them you post, even when they don't. You always defend their position. I assumed that you were a partisan in their camp.
I absolutely agree with you that things can be resolved by a phone call fairly quickly. But most people became frustrated when repeated emails go unanswered. And BSX’s past history of responding to these kinds of threads, often defensively, assures that there will be a response from them if you post.
Instead of responding publicly, perhaps BSX should pick up the phone and give the disgruntled customer a call. After all, the phone does work in both directions and customers don’t feel that once they have placed an order they should have to do all the work to make sure that it is being handled appropriately. The more work you make a customer do the more likely he is to shop elsewhere if he can. Calling the customer to resolve the problem leave the original poster the option to either drop it or go on the board and talk about the nice call he got from BSX that resolved his problem. If he has honor, he will report favorably. If he doesn’t, his words are dust on the ground.You are quite correct that the ultimate arbitrator in these kinds of situations is the market. We all vote with our wallets. But I wouldn’t dismiss the influence of forums entirely. While it is very true that only a few people, and generally the same people, post on the boards, there are many, many lurkers who never post but do read.
Look at all the first time posters who registered to voice opinion about Inchon over at Intrada. For the most part that was the only time they were heard from but they did follow the discussion and I suspect that they follow these debates as well. Whether they are swayed by one side or the other, only they know because they never say.
posted 01-28-2007 05:21 PM PT (US) 
BigT1981

Standard Userer

Can't we all just get along?
posted 01-28-2007 08:23 PM PT (US) 
rkeaveney

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by tjguitar:
The only disappointments I had is they left out some of the best music, from the end of the movie.That music was by Don Harper.
Ryan
posted 01-28-2007 09:01 PM PT (US) 
Lancelot

Standard Userer

Actually...since I started this thread, I think I should probably say take the opportunity to say......that when I started this thread, my objective wasn't to bash Buysoundtrax, even if they're apparently as capitalistic as the next hombre. Let them charge whatever they want. The buyer will decide. I threw the Amazon reference in there to illustrate that it wasn't intended to be as pointedly offensive as some may infer.
Actually, my statement intended (though lacked some clarity, admittedly) -- that for one, soundtracks are not baseball cards, and with the "era" of digital download upon us, there is some seeming irrationality in the price of music amongst collectors.
Those of us here who consider ourselves regulars (though I doubt that I post regularly enough to be considered "valiant" by any standards) certainly have had experiences with tracking down hard-to-find scores, and usually (those of us without industry connections) pay exorbitant prices for such scores, in any format. When the ideal pursuit here is the artform of movie scoring, the attachement of (what seems to the person of modest means) an incredibly high price for the addition of one title to our library is, on occasion, infuriating. Especially for a title that was not long ago released.
This is not, after all, Goldsmith's "Freud", or something rarer. This is something that was released the same year as Britney Spears' "Toxic", but what's frustrating is that anyone reading this can walk into roughly any music retailer and buy that finely crafted jewel on compact disc for the price of a theatre ticket and popcorn.
My "vigilance" is really to the music, not picking at individuals and/or companies trying to capitalize on the supposed collectivity of such scores. Like most of us, I know that buying the album as soon as it's released is the equivalent of "opportunity knocks once", because those who hesitate are subjected to the frustration of collector prices once the album is discontinued. But my desire as a collector is limited by my ability as a consumer, and I must often constrain myself to the limits of my wallet.
But, as I pointed out, would most individuals purchase the actual painting, when a print would suffice? Not arguing aesthetics, here, but in the music's case, is a print worthy enough? Even a print that most would buy? Do they need to charge prices that reflect rarity as well?
--Steve.
[Message edited by Lancelot on 01-28-2007]
posted 01-28-2007 09:51 PM PT (US) 
nuts_score

Standard Userer

This is the same National Treasure that Trevor Rabin scored right? Not some, like, rejected score by Gabriel Yared?Because I know this same score is sitting on a Barnes & Noble shelf (trust me, I was just there) waiting for me to buy it and then sell it for a PeterK-like price on eBay.
posted 01-29-2007 10:12 AM PT (US) Old Infopop Software by UBB
