-
Message Boards

Movie Soundtracks
All things THE BLACK DAHLIA (Page 2)
Archive of old forum. No more postings.
Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.
This topic is 2 pages long: 1 2Author
Topic: All things THE BLACK DAHLIA

sean

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by Marian Schedenig:
De Palma has a tendency of getting excellent scores from any composer (even when they're not so interesting musically to make me buy the CD, they still work very well in the movie).Right on the money. The score works fantastic in the film (and it's a great film, BTW)! But, I'm not interested at all in getting it on CD.
And, Ryan: No, you're wrong; always have been, always will be. Man, I still have Shrek if yous want it: Just say the word.
posted 09-16-2006 11:06 PM PT (US) 
nuts_score

Standard Userer

The film I've been waiting for all year. Pitch-perfect noir. DePalma does it again. If I was a reviewer for some type of magazine that had film reviews I'm sure that would be my headline for a review of The Black Dahlia. Call it my enthusiastic fandom of DePalma's work (amongst the top: Sisters, Carrie, The Fury, The Untouchables, Carlito's Way, Mission: Impossible, and, on repeat viewings, Femme Fatale) but this is one of the best and most fully-realized film this year. The leads are surprisingly strong (this from someone who is a strong advocate against both Josh Hartnett and Hilary Swank) and the plot is thickly saturated with all sorts of classic noir goodness. As a fan of James Ellroy, I read the book shortly after I became aware that David Fincher was trying to adapt the film; well, the film's narrative (from the book's dense perspective) may fall short in some places but it ultimately stands the test of a faithful adaptation. Vilmos Zsigmond cinematography is top-of-the-line what you'd expect from an veteran DP of his caliber (which is why I'm glad some Hollywood Renaissance vets still rely on the best); it's stark at darker moments and full of energy whenever the beauty of Scarlett Johansson is on screen. It'll be an absolute shame (along the lines of Emmanuel Lubezki losing last year's race) if his photography isn't considered at this year's Oscars (and, in my opinion, he should have won this battle hands down). DePalma's camera glides and tracks gracefully, like a true and proven master; making this one to add to his best works. Keep an eye out for a sting operation with Hartnett and Aaron Eckhart in which a perfect crane shot introduces us to an interesting development with the story (perhaps the most interesting at that moment in ther film
) only to pull a complete 360 away from the "breaking news" to concentrate on the details of the city street and back to our "Super Cops"; it's the stuff that makes DePalma such an underrated gem. Mark Isham's score is perfect; and I couldn't say anything more endearing. The score fits the picture like one of the snuggest gloves you'll ever wear. I honestly can't wait to own it. His shootouts are tensefully shot and edited to near-perfection. The trademarked DePalma action/suspense set piece is thrilling and heartbreaking (as well as shock-worthy). But this is a bleak and stark, classic noir; there is very old school filmmaking on display here, someone who knows what elements make film noir as identifying as it is (take notes Robert Rodriguez). Therefor, this picture is definitely not for everyone. Some may find the pacing (one of noir's key elements) too slow or difficult to follow; but if you have a keen eye and a good memory, it should serve you well.And for once, I don't care if Ryan won't like it; because I know he won't. He's already made his dislike of DePalma knowledge on this thread and I know that he won't like the film. If he does see it, I invite him to share his comments and feelings.
NP> Chris Lennertz's Supernatural (***/*****)posted 09-16-2006 11:22 PM PT (US) 
rkeaveney

Standard Userer

Is this thread about Brian DePalma or his infinitely more popular critic Ryan?BTW, speaking of critics, DAHLIA scores an average of "C" at Yahoo! Movies and a somewhat rotten 31%, or "Rotten" rating at Rotten Tomatoes. Box office estimates put it's opening weekend gross at $12 million, that's a few million less than the Rock/football movie scored by Trevor Rabin.
Oscars all 'round for DAHLIA!
Ryan
posted 09-16-2006 11:32 PM PT (US) 
nuts_score

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by rkeaveney:
Is this thread about Brian DePalma or his infinitely more popular critic Ryan?BTW, speaking of critics, DAHLIA scores an average of "C" at Yahoo! Movies and a somewhat rotten 31%, or "Rotten" rating at Rotten Tomatoes. Box office estimates put it's opening weekend gross at $12 million, that's a few million less than the Rock/football movie scored by Trevor Rabin.
Oscars all 'round for DAHLIA!
Ryan
It's good to hear that a movie's sentimental value to an individual is purely based on other critics reviews and box office tallies. Thanks Ryan, you made my night. I guess I don't like the movie after all.
Frankly, I'd be pleased if Dahlia didn't win any Oscars other than the technical awards it truly deserves, because, frankly, recent Best Picture winners are about as memorable as a kick in the nuts - speaking of which, what won last year? Was it that remake of David Cronenberg's Crash? I don't understand why Hollywood felt it necessary to remake a great movie in the first place, especially when you just add racism on top of all those people obsessed with car crashes and their effects on the human body. J.G. Ballard must have been upset; what's next, a remake of Empire of the Sun in which we all learn the important lesson of greed?

[Message edited by nuts_score on 09-16-2006]
posted 09-16-2006 11:52 PM PT (US) 
sean

Standard Userer

Ryan, you're right. This thread is all about you.Again, you conservative moron, with your box office tallies, as if they mean anything at all, and web ratings (web ratings!!! HA!); Rotten Tomatoes at that! Since that's your gauge on movies (hell, you're a Brian Tyler sycophant, so no surprise there), than you're of the same moronic breed who's only opinions on movies come from Film Force, or worse, Empire.
Go see the movie before you type words about it, and other than that, have fun at Gridiron Gang, because all that money it's making, it must be fantastic!
posted 09-17-2006 10:16 AM PT (US) 
nuts_score

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by sean:
. . . than you're of the same moronic breed who's only opinions on movies come from Film Force, or worse, Empire.Go see the movie before you type words about it, and other than that, have fun at Gridiron Gang, because all that money it's making, it must be fantastic!
Ouch, it's almost considered being blackballed when you're compared to Empire magazine.

Speaking of fantastic movies that score number one at the box office: The Covenant. It tallied $9 million and a number one place in the B.O.; judging by that money and that bad-ass first place ticket, it must be near-perfect! Never mind the 2% score it has on Rotten Tomatoes!
posted 09-17-2006 01:21 PM PT (US) 
rkeaveney

Standard Userer

What a world we live in when something like THE BLACK DAHLIA, a film made by a faded director with C-list stars based on an unsolved murder, fail at the box office. It's just not fair that the public wasn't interested. Really people need to stop gauging a film's quality via accomplished critics and start heading to MovieMusic.com, and digesting the impressive arguments by tastemakers "nuts_score" and some guy from the backwoods Ontario.Ryan
posted 09-17-2006 04:46 PM PT (US) 
nuts_score

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by rkeaveney:
What a world we live in when something like THE BLACK DAHLIA, a film made by a faded director with C-list stars based on an unsolved murder, fail at the box office. It's just not fair that the public wasn't interested. Really people need to stop gauging a film's quality via accomplished critics and start heading to MovieMusic.com, and digesting the impressive arguments by tastemakers "nuts_score" and some guy from the backwoods Ontario.Ryan
Ryan, what evidence do you have that DePalma is a "faded director"? As far as I remember, he's still considered one of the top directors still working (imagine that, he still works, he still gets to make movies!) and has a good variety of fans; certainly as many as Spielberg or (gasp!) Michael Bay has (well, I'm certain he has more qualified fans than Bay). C-list stars? Didn't Hilary Swank win two Oscars within the past five years? Isn't Scarlett Johansson considered one of "the most gorgeous people in Hollywood"? Isn't Josh Hartnett a heartthrob beloved by millions of women? Isn't Aaron Eckhart a more than qualified talent? Hell, even Mike Starr has a great resume. Accomplished critics? Most of them respect and appreciate the strange and cinematic work that DePalma has to offer as opposed to the shlock that Hollywood usually churns out of its franchise and remake bonanzas. Have you taken time to look over most of the critics that submit reviews at Rotten Tomatoes? Pauline Kael certainly can't deliver them a review from outside the grave, because I'm sure she would have simultaneously loved and hated (for mysoginistic reasons on DePalmas part) this film. Very few of DePalma's films are considered commercial successes, but that doesn't make me want to give up my respect for an auteur from the Hollywood Renaissance; he still knows how to spin a gripping yarn. Dahlia is a straight DePalma movie; it's a straight Ellroy movie. It's noir at its pulpiest. Genre films aren't for everyone, especially when they had false delusions that this might be considered an Oscar contender (trust me, DePalma doesn't make movies to win a shiny statuette, he makes movies that cater to cinephiles; people who are willing to lose themselves in the experience and enjoy the movies for what they are). This is an independent film financed and filmed outside of America; this is not Hollywood product, despite its pedigree. Go see the movie Ryan; I dare you to. Come out from behind the shadow of Rotten Tomatoes and like something for a change.
I find your lack of faith disturbing.
posted 09-17-2006 09:14 PM PT (US) 
franz_conrad

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by nuts_score:
...he still knows how to spin a gripping yarn. Dahlia is a straight DePalma movie; it's a straight Ellroy movie. It's noir at its pulpiest. Genre films aren't for everyone, especially when they had false delusions that this might be considered an Oscar contender (trust me, DePalma doesn't make movies to win a shiny statuette, he makes movies that cater to cinephiles; people who are willing to lose themselves in the experience and enjoy the movies for what they are).I like MIAMI VICE for this reason. It's a genre film, highly cinematic, and is done wiht a completely straight face.
Sounds like I will enjoy (if guiltily) BLACK DAHLIA as well...posted 09-17-2006 09:19 PM PT (US) 
vdemona

Standard Userer

>> a film made by a faded director with C-list stars based on an unsolved murder, fail at the box office.<<I think it's too early right now to know whether or not it truly failed. Didn't it just come out Friday?
posted 09-17-2006 10:37 PM PT (US) 
nuts_score

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by vdemona:
I think it's too early right now to know whether or not it truly failed. Didn't it just come out Friday?To people like a Ryan, a film's success and classic status is based purely on its opening weekend box office.
posted 09-17-2006 10:57 PM PT (US) 
sean

Standard Userer

HAHA! Ryan likes Bad Boys 2 and The Passion Of The Christ!!! And he's in a hissy fit for not being able to own the complete score to Shrek LMAO; dude, maybe Brian Tyler has a copy somewhere for you?By Ryan's gauge a film about The Rock teaching rapists and murderers how to play football in one movie and another about teenaged voodoo queens is certainly the right recipe for success and the right mish-mash to get caught up after Tokyo Drift.
[Message edited by sean on 09-17-2006]
posted 09-17-2006 11:06 PM PT (US) 
nuts_score

Standard Userer

Continuous listens . . . and I'm still disappointed that no one else has an opinion to share on this score. They have an active thread on FSM where everyone seems to really enjoy this music, but sadly, not so much here. Has anyone bought this yet or even listened to the sample on SoundtrackNet? I don't lose my patience very often, but a lot of you are missing out on some great music.
posted 10-17-2006 11:15 AM PT (US) 
Dr Lenera

Non-Standard Userer

I'm going to buy this soon,I loved the movie and really liked the music too,though I'm not exactly a fan of Mark Isham. The music was really melodramatic and old-style,which totally went with the style of the film and I liked very much. Maybe I'll have a look in my local HMV and Virgin tomorrow,though my hopes aren't high,will probably have to order it as usual.....
posted 10-17-2006 11:34 AM PT (US) 
Demetris Christodoulides

Standard Userer

The movie is really bad indeed but the score is a no-miss!
http://www.moviemusic.com/comments.asp?mm=blackdahlia&author=2373
posted 10-17-2006 11:56 AM PT (US) 
nuts_score

Standard Userer

Thanks for your review on the comment page Demetris! I couldn't agree more.
posted 10-17-2006 10:01 PM PT (US) 
franz_conrad

Standard Userer

Saw this film today. I have mixed feelings about it all - I feel the script didn't give enough room for Aaron Eckhardt to show us the true nature of his character, same with the Madeleine character. Above all, I'm shocked that DePalma didn't trust Mia Kirshner to pull off both sides of the obvious doppelganger roles: Madeleine and Betty. What a misfire. It never seemed credible for a moment that the two would be confused.quote:
Originally posted by nuts_score:
Vilmos Zsigmond cinematography is top-of-the-line what you'd expect from an veteran DP of his caliber (which is why I'm glad some Hollywood Renaissance vets still rely on the best); it's stark at darker moments and full of energy whenever the beauty of Scarlett Johansson is on screen. It'll be an absolute shame (along the lines of Emmanuel Lubezki losing last year's race) if his photography isn't considered at this year's Oscars (and, in my opinion, he should have won this battle hands down).First time I've noticed hard light in a long time in a recent film. Wouldn't mind seeing a comparison of Zsigmond's work here with that of Dante Spinotti on LA CONFIDENTIAL.
quote:
DePalma's camera glides and tracks gracefully, like a true and proven master; making this one to add to his best works. Keep an eye out for a sting operation with Hartnett and Aaron Eckhart in which a perfect crane shot introduces us to an interesting development with the story (perhaps the most interesting at that moment in ther film
) only to pull a complete 360 away from the "breaking news" to concentrate on the details of the city street and back to our "Super Cops"; it's the stuff that makes DePalma such an underrated gem. Reminded me a lot of Orson Welles as director in TOUCH OF EVIL actually. A very baroque style.
quote:
Mark Isham's score is perfect; and I couldn't say anything more endearing. The score fits the picture like one of the snuggest gloves you'll ever wear. I honestly can't wait to own it.Highly praiseworthy score. The setpiece scoring alone is masterful film music. The rest is richly thematic icing on the cake. DePalma gives so much room for the music to make a strong contribution.
quote:
His shootouts are tensefully shot and edited to near-perfection. The trademarked DePalma action/suspense set piece is thrilling and heartbreaking (as well as shock-worthy).True. The blending of montage and scoring for the staircase scene was dazzling. One of the best such scenes from dePalma, I think.
quote:
But this is a bleak and stark, classic noir; there is very old school filmmaking on display here, someone who knows what elements make film noir as identifying as it is (take notes Robert Rodriguez). Therefor, this picture is definitely not for everyone. Some may find the pacing (one of noir's key elements) too slow or difficult to follow; but if you have a keen eye and a good memory, it should serve you well.Personally I feel the script is too disinterested in police procedure and in how a mystery is unravelled, particularly when placed alongside other films this year where those elements excel - MIAMI VICE and THE DEPARTED. All the discoveries come too easily to the Hartnet character (and the scriptwriter, who leans too heavily on narration, I feel), when you compare it to the careful release of information about 'Rollo Tamassi' through the three main 'good' cops of LA CONFIDENTIAL.
Much as I love DePalma's elegant technique, and a lot of the artistry on show here, I would happily bet money on David Fincher's version as having been more likely to provoke enduring feelings beyond the aesthetics.
posted 12-23-2006 09:24 PM PT (US) 
franz_conrad

Standard Userer

Nuts, I summon thee. Answer the call.
posted 12-25-2006 06:47 AM PT (US) 
Marian Schedenig

Standard Userer

Good analysis there. I kinda liked it (it's hard for me not to like a De Palma when it's not totally absurd and has some stylistically amazing moments), but it probably wasn't very good, mostly for the reasons you mentioned.The score does seem very good though, also after finally having it on CD.

NP: Casino Royale (David Arnold)
posted 12-25-2006 07:29 AM PT (US) 
franz_conrad

Standard Userer

Nuts, wherefore art thou?
posted 01-02-2007 05:13 PM PT (US) 
rkeaveney

Standard Userer

He seems interested when I post on this thread, so for your sake, Franz, I'm doing just that.Ryan
NP: "3m37_Singing_prin_no_vox"posted 01-02-2007 10:17 PM PT (US) 
franz_conrad

Standard Userer

* Franz bows to Ryan *(Ryan's best post since 'Music from the Unreleased Soundtracks of Films starring Treat Williams'.)
posted 01-02-2007 10:35 PM PT (US) 
JeffBond

Standard Userer

My uninformed opinion (based on only making it through about 60% of the movie) was that it was quite lousy, although the score seemed terrific. Isham is a guy whose work I had no interest in at all until the last year or so when scores like Eight Below, Bobby and Black Dahlia show him working in very sophisticated orchestral territory.A lot of the movie seemed too much contemporary actors playing at being in the period--Hartnett's narration seemed an all-time low. I love much of DePalma's work but here the craft was not enough to get me past the (mostly) bad performances. Scarlett and Hilary are all right, Mia Kirshner seemed quite good, but the leads barely registered and Rose McGowan as a foul-mouthed actress waiting for a truck to pick her up stank up the joint so much my wife stopped to watch for a moment and said "Jesus, she's AWFUL!"
posted 01-03-2007 11:05 AM PT (US) 
rkeaveney

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by franz_conrad:
* Franz bows to Ryan *(Ryan's best post since 'Music from the Unreleased Soundtracks of Films starring Treat Williams'.)
I love that disc. I made copies for friends and family for Christmas. Tor Hyam's "Chalkboard Elegy" from THE SUBSTITUTE 3 is a highlight.
Ryan
posted 01-03-2007 02:45 PM PT (US) 
nuts_score

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by rkeaveney:
He seems interested when I post on this thread, so for your sake, Franz, I'm doing just that.Ryan
NP: "3m37_Singing_prin_no_vox"Haha, good call Ryan. Sorry Franz; I recieved the film on DVD for Christmas and I'm anxiously awaiting a re-watch before I can assess your own opinions. I did enjoy what you had to write and I'll keep an eye out for your merits and flaws.
posted 01-03-2007 05:58 PM PT (US) 
PeterK

FishChip

Bark bark. Bad movie. Finally saw this; glad I waited. Yeah, film noir does take its time to play out, but real film noir is a lot more subtle. This wasn't necessarily a complex storyline. The biggest misfire for me was the cast. These guys make the Island of Misfit Toys look like top of the line FAO/Schartz merchandise. Score has enough to chew on, but even it seems a bit uninspired in most onscreen places (album listen is preferred). Time to go watch LA Confidential and clean the palate!
posted 01-12-2007 09:51 AM PT (US) Old Infopop Software by UBB
