The MovieMusic Store shopping cart   |  sign in
    SEARCH  
  • Home
  • Browse Store
    • New Soundtrack CDs
    • Top Sellers
    • Low Price New CDs
    • Used CDs
    • Soundtrack Compilations
    • Score Composers
    • Soundtrack Labels
    • Soundtracks by Year
    • ... detailed search page
  • Store Info
    • Happy Customers!
    • $1 Shipping
    • Accepted Payment Methods
    • Safe Shopping Guarantee
    • Shipping Rates & Policies
    • Our Privacy Policy
    • About Us
  • Help Center
    • My Account
    • How to Order
    • Search Tips
    • Return/Refund Policy
    • Cancelling Your Order
    • Contact the Store
  • The Lobby
  •   Message Boards
      Movie Soundtracks
      Revell-ling

    Archive of old forum. No more postings.

    Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.

    Author
    Topic:   Revell-ling

     Lou Goldberg
     Click Here to Email Lou Goldberg
     Standard Userer
     

    This is from an interview with Graeme Revell over at MusicOnFilm in which he explains why modern film music sounds as it does. Should we agree and stop throwing rocks at the composers and blame the system instead or is this just a weak composer shifting the blame elsewhere:

    GR: Sometimes we do get criticized for not writing on the same level as Steiner or Goldsmith or somebody like that, but what everybody forgets is that those guys usually had six to eight weeks to write a score. That's a big difference from seven or eight days. Also, there's also the fact that even if we do have a locked picture, frequently it's filled with a lot of green-screen and you're not always really sure of what's going on in the film. That's what leads to generic padding and rhythmic patterns to fill up a scene. I recently had a conversation after the BMI awards where an older gentleman commented that I must feel a little sad that I'm not able to write long melodic themes like Rota and Morricone used to do. My response was that you just can't when you have a piece of picture that comes through the door with a hundred cuts in one scene. The picture is practically a strobe light in front of you. You have to go with what you see. That's the job.


    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-13-2005 07:37 AM PT (US)     

     Widescreen
     Standard Userer
     

    So maybe we as consumers should demand more long melodic themes. Maybe some filmmaker should give Revell a chance to write something longer in that vein, and test whether or not Revell can actually write material like that.

    Only way we'll know is if there is a shift in the way things are handled, and you know what? That's extremely rare to happen.

    I say the simple answer is to exercise consumer awareness and power when viewing and listening.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-13-2005 09:17 AM PT (US)     

     nuts_score
     Click Here to Email nuts_score
     Standard Userer
     

    I agree with Widescreen, here. In the past decade or so, we've heard so many imitators of both Zimmer's and Revell's style that the current audience simply identifies with what music they churn out in as little time as Revell claims to often have. Even more recent filmmakers have adapted to this as well; I wouldn't be surprised if many of them aren't film music fans in general and rely on their editors to create the musical soundscape with whatever temp track they choose to fit the visuals.

    To me, being such an enthusiastic score buff, has helped my filmmaking incredibly. I remember my senior year in high school when I completed what is still my best short film - titled 'The Constantine Chase' - I chose to use a cue from Morricone - "A Silhouette of Doom" from Navajo Joe - and many of my classmates looked at me strangely because I had not chose the latest single from Good Charlotte or Drowning Pool; yet my film got praise from the teacher because I used such a cue. When she confronted me later and asked me why I would do something so different, I simply told her of my affection for film scores and she smiled as if I was I was the last of a dying breed.


    NP> Rozsa's Ben-Hur ****/****

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-13-2005 10:48 AM PT (US)     

     Lancelot
     Click Here to Email Lancelot
     Standard Userer
     

    Ok, where do we go to file for long melodic themes?

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-13-2005 12:07 PM PT (US)     

     Erik Woods
     Click Here to Email Erik Woods
     Standard Userer
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by Lou Goldberg:

    GR: Sometimes we do get criticized for not writing on the same level as Steiner or Goldsmith or somebody like that, but what everybody forgets is that those guys usually had six to eight weeks to write a score. That's a big difference from seven or eight days. Also, there's also the fact that even if we do have a locked picture, frequently it's filled with a lot of green-screen and you're not always really sure of what's going on in the film. That's what leads to generic padding and rhythmic patterns to fill up a scene. I recently had a conversation after the BMI awards where an older gentleman commented that I must feel a little sad that I'm not able to write long melodic themes like Rota and Morricone used to do. My response was that you just can't when you have a piece of picture that comes through the door with a hundred cuts in one scene. The picture is practically a strobe light in front of you. You have to go with what you see. That's the job.


    Oh, cry me a river. How come guys like Williams, Broughton, Holdridge, Shearmur and Giacchino... just to name a few... can write big, expansive, melodic scores in the same time line with the same crazy cuts and unfinished scenes? Don't hear them bitching!

    Go join James Horner with his list of bullshit compliants as to why he can't write good scores anymore.

    -Erik-

    [Message edited by Erik Woods on 12-13-2005]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-13-2005 02:14 PM PT (US)     

     James
     Click Here to Email James
     Standard Userer
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by Erik Woods:
    Oh, cry me a river. How come guys like Williams, Broughton, Holdridge, Shearmur and Giacchino... just to name a few... can write big, expansive, melodic scores in the same time line with the same crazy cuts and unfinished scenes? Don't hear them bitching!

    Well, you don't hear Broughton and Holdridge doing much of anything. They write a certain style of music that has gone largely out of fashion and are no longer favored composers because of it. And while some of Shearmur's work is applicable to what you're saying, he's written some pretty divergent scores and quite a lot of it does not. E.g., didn't he say himself that the love theme in Sky Captain never appears fully developed in the film? And that's even a case in which the director specifically wanted a full-blooded old fashioned piece.

    And I don't really see the "complaint" in Revell's words as quoted above. He ends by saying "That's the job." His attitude overall seems pretty pragmatic to me.

    quote:
    Originally posted by Widescreen:
    Maybe some filmmaker should give Revell a chance to write something longer in that vein, and test whether or not Revell can actually write material like that.

    This has already happened. Human Nature and Anne Frank: The Whole Story, during a phase of a couple years where Revell himself said he was consciously trying to break free of the stereotypical assignments he was always given. I guess it didn't work. Good scores, though. A shame the latter was never released.

    Kirk

    [Message edited by James on 12-13-2005]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-13-2005 04:17 PM PT (US)     

     Widescreen
     Standard Userer
     

    Good to know about Human Nature and Anne Frank. I've never heard them, so I can't comment on them. I tell you, though, I like Red Planet (though the track "Alone" and Canto XXX are self-rips from his work on the film Strange Days - see the song "Fall In The Light"), Tomb Raider, Daredevil, and of course, The Crow.

    But then, my tastes in film music cover a broad spectrum and usually smacks in the face of others.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-13-2005 09:06 PM PT (US)     

     Erik Woods
     Click Here to Email Erik Woods
     Standard Userer
     

    Revell didn't write one single note of Anne Frank!

    -Erik-

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-13-2005 09:20 PM PT (US)     

     Erik Woods
     Click Here to Email Erik Woods
     Standard Userer
     

    Originally posted by Widescreen:

    E.g., didn't he say himself that the love theme in Sky Captain never appears fully developed in the film? And that's even a case in which the director specifically wanted a full-blooded old fashioned piece.

    The full version of the love theme was recorded and was to play over top the end credits... unfortunately, the director or producer wanted Jane Monheit's version of Over The Rainbow playing instead.

    -Erik-

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-13-2005 09:25 PM PT (US)     

     James
     Click Here to Email James
     Standard Userer
     

    I was the one who posed the question about Sky Captain. At any rate, thanks for the clarification.

    Are you implying that (a) ghostwriter(s) was/were responsible for Anne Frank, or that it was all taken from other sources? I only heard the score once, four years ago when the TV movie first premiered, so I couldn't exactly hum anything I heard back then. I just remember thinking it was extremely good, melodic and very unexpected for a Revell score. But anyway, what do you mean (I'm genuinely curious)?

    Kirk

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-13-2005 11:04 PM PT (US)     
     

    Old Infopop Software by UBB

    © 1998-2011, The MovieMusic Company