-
Message Boards

Movie Soundtracks
The Varèse Sarabande X-Mas Eve announcement
Archive of old forum. No more postings.
Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.
Author
Topic: The Varèse Sarabande X-Mas Eve announcement

Dinko

Standard Userer

quote:
Christmas Eve Announcement!
Date: 12/24/2003
We hope that everyone who reads this managed to find something to enjoy among our many soundtrack releases of 2003. We are already hard at work on many exciting new projects for 2004. Save your Christmas money. You’re going to need it! We wish everyone a Merry Christmas and a happy and healthy New Year. To raise the curtain on just one of the projects we are working on, we are very pleased to announce that we will indeed be releasing Jerry Goldsmith’s unused score from the film Timeline. Though unfortunate post-production events required the film to be rescored, we’re certainly not going to let that stand in our way from releasing Goldsmith’s magnificent music. And it won’t be just any CD. 2004 will bring Jerry Goldsmith’s Timeline as a special edition, deluxe, fully-compatible, hybrid SACD. Playable on all compact disc players, our release will present this orchestral tour-de-force as an audiophile spectacular. This will be a regular release, not a CD Club exclusive. Do we have more surprises in store? Of course we do. Expect the unexpected!That it be Timeline elicits a :shrug:
But another Goldsmith hi-rez thing from VS? Woohoo! If it's anything like the Nemesis SACD: double woohoo!
posted 12-24-2003 10:05 AM PT (US) 
Alexborn007

Standard Userer

Excellent. Simply Excellent.Merry Frickin Christmas!!!
posted 12-24-2003 10:13 AM PT (US) 
Crono/Kyp

Standard Userer

::meow::Looks like the cat's out of the bag

So much for keeping secrets! Happy Chrsitmas y'all!
--Brian
NP: Matrix Cubed
[Message edited by Crono/Kyp on 12-24-2003]
posted 12-24-2003 10:15 AM PT (US) 
Dylan

Standard Userer

Great news. I'm certainly buying it.Dylan
NP: Big Fishposted 12-24-2003 10:17 AM PT (US) 
JoeInSanDiego

Standard Userer

Varese can always be counted on to please us soundtrack fans! Another great reason to support this awesome group of film score lovers! Thanks, Robert and everyone else associated with this project! It's nice to know Jerry's magnificent score will get the chance to be heard by the masses...and not just bootleggers and industry people!THANK YOU!
Joe
posted 12-24-2003 10:18 AM PT (US) 
Alexborn007

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by JoeInSanDiego:
Varese can always be counted on to please us soundtrack fans! Another great reason to support this awesome group of film score lovers! Thanks, Robert and everyone else associated with this project! It's nice to know Jerry's magnificent score will get the chance to be heard by the masses...and not just bootleggers and industry people!THANK YOU!
Joe
Well said! Varese certainly is making a good hearted move with this release. Especially by making it a regular release. I'm quite surprised.posted 12-24-2003 10:26 AM PT (US) 
jonathan_little

Standard Userer

OK, I'll buy that, especially as a SACD. I assume that "deluxe" means that it's going to be more than a half hour of score.I think the deeper message in this announcement may be that Paramount is getting a clue when it comes to fanboy film scores. (Wishful thinking on my part.)
quote:
This will be a regular release, not a CD Club exclusive.Thanks!
[Message edited by jonathan_little on 12-24-2003]
posted 12-24-2003 10:26 AM PT (US) 
Beatty

Standard Userer

I'd rather it not be an SACD exclusive, because I will never own an SACD player because the format just is not that much better, if better at all. It's just hype and I don't like paying for hype.
I'm glad it's the unreleased score. I think I knew that FSM had a legit CD when the score was reviewed in comparison with the Tyler score.
Hooray for Timeline, kudos to VS and SACD can bite my shiny metal ass.[Message edited by Beatty on 12-24-2003]
posted 12-24-2003 10:53 AM PT (US) 
Foobsie
Standard Userer

HAPPY!FoobsZ
posted 12-24-2003 11:05 AM PT (US) 
Al

Standard Userer

Wow. I didn't actually think this would be the news. Thank you, Varese!Like I said before, Goldsmith leaving Timeline didn't disappoint me as much as when I thought I wouldn't be able to hear the score. Hopefully having this released will end the needless bitterness of a select few angry Goldsmith fans. All I know is that I am one very happy Goldsmith fan.
By the way, to those who have followed my discussions about my underwhelment of Brian Tyler up to this point, I'm receiving his Timeline score tomorrow and am looking forward to hearing it for myself. Everything I've heard from him so far is average to my ears, but I'm hoping this is the one that will show me why he quickly garnered such a strong following.
I wish you all a very happy holiday.
posted 12-24-2003 11:46 AM PT (US) 
jonathan_little

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by Beatty:
I'd rather it not be an SACD exclusive, because I will never own an SACD player because the format just is not that much better, if better at all.Huh? If SACD is so bad, you can always play the CD layer instead.

PCM 44.1khz/16 bit stereo vs. DSD 5.1 channel sound? I think I know my choice. (But sadly I can't afford a SACD player yet.)
[Message edited by jonathan_little on 12-24-2003]
posted 12-24-2003 11:56 AM PT (US) 
Jeron

Standard Userer

Guys... the announcement said it's a fully compatible hybrid SACD, which will be playable on all cd players. So chill. If you have an SACD player, you'll get a cool treat. If not, you can still enjoy the music just as you would without the fancy 5.1 mess.Don't be a freak! Everyone wins.
posted 12-24-2003 03:00 PM PT (US) 
Marian Schedenig

Standard Userer

All I can say to that: Truly happy christmas!
quote:
Originally posted by Varese:
Do we have more surprises in store? Of course we do. Expect the unexpected!Bring 'em on!
posted 12-24-2003 03:45 PM PT (US) 
Beatty

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by Jeron:
If not, you can still enjoy the music just as you would without the fancy 5.1 mess.And -- yay? -- I pay extra for this dubious layer?
quote:
You mean don't be a Grinch, but the main winner is whoever is at the receiving end of the amplified cost of the SACD scam. 5.1 is just better-promoted quad. Which means better-hyped hooie.
Don't be a freak! Everyone wins.
The law is animal shall not kill animal ... no strike that, the law is two ears means two channels.I for one do not welcome our new DRM overlords.
posted 12-24-2003 05:01 PM PT (US) 
Hector J. Guzman

Standard Userer

That is truly fantastic news! Boy, those Varese boys are really something, I wish them the best, and so for you guys too!Merry Christmas!!!
NP. Handel Messiah
Soloists
Academy of St. Martin in the Fields
Sir Neville Marrinerposted 12-24-2003 05:01 PM PT (US) 
Jeron

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by Beatty:
And -- yay? -- I pay extra for this dubious layer?Well just think of it as paying for a disc full of great music, something we wouldn't have (commercially) had Varese not done the footwork.
And yeah, don't be a grinch man. Seems like there's so much to be cool and happy about, why be the stickler and pick on stuff that doesn't really matter?
j
posted 12-24-2003 06:21 PM PT (US) 
jonathan_little

Standard Userer

Beatty, I'm sorry, but you're really speaking some crazy stuff."Better-promoted quad?" There's really not much comparison. SACD doesn't have any "steering signals" or junk like that. The multichannel sound is not delivered on 8 track, LPs, or open reel tape. It's 5 discrete full bandwidth channels of sound plus a limited bandwidth low frequency channel all on a fairly durable plastic disc that doesn't wear out every time you play it. Varese can even throw a high resolution stereo mix on the disc if they feel like it, like they did with the SACD of Nemesis.
If you haven't heard 5.1 channel sound, you should go to a home theater store and try it out. You'll find that six speaker sound blows stereo out of the water.
It's far from a scam. The cost of many SACDs rival their CD counterparts, and hopefully the Timeline disc will be priced a bit lower than the Nemesis SACD was.
[Message edited by jonathan_little on 12-24-2003]
posted 12-24-2003 06:30 PM PT (US) 
jonathan_little

Standard Userer

And by the way,The Black Hole is the first digitally recorded film score.
posted 12-24-2003 06:33 PM PT (US) 
Jeff78

Standard Userer

Oh great, well let the fanboys drooling begin. You know you want to, and we know your going to.Jeff
[Message edited by Jeff78 on 12-24-2003]
posted 12-24-2003 11:05 PM PT (US) 
Jeron

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by Jeff78:
Oh great, well let the fanboys drooling begin. You know you want to, and we know your going to.Jeff
Ha, well Jeff... you're certainly not foolin' anyone. You're a fanboy, just like any of the rest of us. I'm not sure how big of a Goldsmith fan you are, but I know a certain Beltrami nut..........

Cheers,
and Merry Christmas.Jeron
posted 12-24-2003 11:50 PM PT (US) 
Jeff78

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by Jeron:
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=1 face=arial>quote:</font><HR size=1>Originally posted by Jeff78:
[b]Oh great, well let the fanboys drooling begin. You know you want to, and we know your going to.Jeff<HR size=1></BLOCKQUOTE>
Ha, well Jeff... you're certainly not foolin' anyone. You're a fanboy, just like any of the rest of us. I'm not sure how big of a Goldsmith fan you are, but I know a certain Beltrami nut..........

Cheers,
and Merry Christmas.Jeron[/B]
True, but I don't get all worked up over his stuff, like if one of his scores gets rejected. When I heard his score was rejected for Texas Rangers, I was alittle disappointed, but I did not bash Rabin when he took over the project. I waited to hear what he had come up with. In fact I think his score ended up better than Beltramis.
But, and I know you know this, that it's different when a Goldsmith score gets rejected. it's like the gates of hell opened up and let out it's minions to terrorize the world.Jeff
posted 12-25-2003 01:12 AM PT (US) 
Hector J. Guzman

Standard Userer

I hardly remember people bashing Brian Tyler, if they ever did. What I remember, though, were complaints about the filmmakers, not the composer.
Merry Christmas.[Message edited by Hector J. Guzman on 12-25-2003]
posted 12-25-2003 02:20 AM PT (US) 
juha

Standard Userer

Excellent news!!! I liked Tyler's score but I have a feeling that Jerry's score will be even better. Thank you Varese.Juha
posted 12-25-2003 04:58 AM PT (US) 
Mark Olivarez

Standard Userer

Well finally we will be able to "officially" judge who wrote the better score, although it will all boil down to ones own opinion.What I'm more curious about is how this release came about and hopefully Varese will shed some light on this in the linear notes.
Considering two composers were hired and the movie tanked at the box office and all the other problems encountered one has to wonder.
posted 12-25-2003 10:22 AM PT (US) 
Jeff78

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by Hector J. Guzman:
I hardly remember people bashing Brian Tyler, if they ever did. What I remember, though, were complaints about the filmmakers, not the composer.
Merry Christmas.[Message edited by Hector J. Guzman on 12-25-2003]
Well I do remember some people bashing Tyler in general when they found out he was replacing Goldsmiths. But I'm not going to go do a search on it like others would, because I really don't care all that much about it. =Þ
Jeff
posted 12-25-2003 12:11 PM PT (US) 
Alexborn007

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by Mark Olivarez:
Well finally we will be able to "officially" judge who wrote the better score, although it will all boil down to ones own opinion.What I'm more curious about is how this release came about and hopefully Varese will shed some light on this in the linear notes.
Considering two composers were hired and the movie tanked at the box office and all the other problems encountered one has to wonder.
I can probably bet dollars to donuts Goldsmith is laughing his arse off about it.posted 12-25-2003 12:39 PM PT (US) 
jonathan_little

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by Jeff78:
Oh great, well let the fanboys drooling begin. You know you want to, and we know your going to.
It was only a matter of time. Yes, we definitely need another Goldsmith vs. Tyler thread.
posted 12-25-2003 07:30 PM PT (US) 
Jeron

Standard Userer

LOL, please, let's stay as far away from that as possible.
posted 12-25-2003 10:04 PM PT (US) 
JoeInSanDiego

Standard Userer

I was also completely unaware of any Tyler bashing at first (save for the same people spewing their same crap...nothing unusual). I, for one, am sick of being told that, since I LOVE Goldsmith's music, I MUST, by nature, hate everyone elses. God forbid Goldsmith be replaced...the replacement composer is suddenly the anti-christ and needs to die in flames and a slow, lingering death. Pure rubbish!!!Was I disappointed that Goldsmith was replaced on Timeline? Yes, as much as Jeff was disappointed by Beltrami's replacement on another film classic, Texas Rangers. Did I bash Tyler? Not once...in fact, I was enthusiasticly supportive and pleasantly thrilled by the music he provided for the film. NOT ALL GOLDSMITH SUPPORTERS ARE RABID LUNATICS THAT HATE EVERYONE ELSE!!! General statements show just how ignorant some people can be. If you're gonna bash someone...be specific on who you are bashing, please.
And for the record, I am JAZZED to be able to get the Goldsmith score for Timeline...NOT to compare it to Tyler's, but from a filmmaker's point of view, it'll be very interesting to see the direction each composer went with the music and, knowing Donner initially WANTED Goldsmith to go the way he did...only to have that direction shift...will be very interesting as well.
SheriffJoe
NP: House of Sand and Fog (Horner)posted 12-26-2003 08:22 AM PT (US) 
Al

Standard Userer

Joe, I wrote a response to this topic much in the same vein but my computer messed up before I could post it, and you sum up my feelings exactly. There is a notion in some people's comments that all Goldsmith fans are old-fashioned, close-minded people who think the world is flat, as if like those old explorers, they won't venture far from the reliable Goldsmith realm. And that's way off course.The only difference in our arguments, Joe, is that I previously wasn't excited about Tyler's assignment just as I wasn't excited about any of his work. However, having just heard his Timeline score, I'd say he more than just earned his paycheck. While he still has more scores to compose before he develops his definite identity, the Timeline score is the first by Tyler that I'd personally recommend. It may end without a real sense of resolution, but the album is so well-rounded that it provides a satisfaction I hadn't received from his other scores. There is such enthusiasm in this score, and it does resonate to the listener to some extent. It's not the next best thing, but it's enough to make Godsend the first Tyler score that I look forward to.
I also hope those who are annoyed by Goldsmith fans won't pass off the release as something to please the fanboys, but rather will give it a fair listen themselves, just as I have Tyler's score.
I also hope for world peace. Bye.
[Message edited by Al on 12-26-2003]
posted 12-26-2003 09:52 AM PT (US) 
Jeff78

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by JoeInSanDiego:
I was also completely unaware of any Tyler bashing at first (save for the same people spewing their same crap...nothing unusual). I, for one, am sick of being told that, since I LOVE Goldsmith's music, I MUST, by nature, hate everyone elses. God forbid Goldsmith be replaced...the replacement composer is suddenly the anti-christ and needs to die in flames and a slow, lingering death. Pure rubbish!!!Was I disappointed that Goldsmith was replaced on Timeline? Yes, as much as Jeff was disappointed by Beltrami's replacement on another film classic, Texas Rangers. Did I bash Tyler? Not once...in fact, I was enthusiasticly supportive and pleasantly thrilled by the music he provided for the film. NOT ALL GOLDSMITH SUPPORTERS ARE RABID LUNATICS THAT HATE EVERYONE ELSE!!! General statements show just how ignorant some people can be. If you're gonna bash someone...be specific on who you are bashing, please.
And for the record, I am JAZZED to be able to get the Goldsmith score for Timeline...NOT to compare it to Tyler's, but from a filmmaker's point of view, it'll be very interesting to see the direction each composer went with the music and, knowing Donner initially WANTED Goldsmith to go the way he did...only to have that direction shift...will be very interesting as well.
SheriffJoe
NP: House of Sand and Fog (Horner)
I never said you were a fanboy =Þ
There are Goldsmith fans and there are Goldsmith fanboys. I was going to type more of what I think about fanboys, but I don't want to piss anyone off over the holidays. It still boggles my mind that people take stuff personal over the internet.Jeff
posted 12-26-2003 10:57 AM PT (US) 
HadrianD

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by Dylan:
Great news. I'm certainly buying it.Me too
posted 12-26-2003 12:12 PM PT (US) 
Al

Standard Userer

quote:
Originally posted by Jeff78:It still boggles my mind that people take stuff personal over the internet.We're not exactly sending form letters back and forth on this message board, Jeff. It's still words written personally by real people to real people.
quote:
There are Goldsmith fans and there are Goldsmith fanboys.The only difference I can see is that Goldsmith "fanboys" is just a word you use for the certain Goldsmith fans that get on your nerves. And if people can get on your nerves over the internet, then why should it boggle your mind that people take stuff personally over the internet?
NP: "Timeline" - Tylerposted 12-26-2003 12:36 PM PT (US) 
HAL 2000
Standard Userer

If you check out these threads you'll find precious little in the way of anything negative regarding Brian Tyler replacing Goldsmith on Timeline except for maybe a couple here and there. But even self-confessed Goldsmith junkies come across as balanced and generally supportive of Tyler while cursing the studio for meddling in the film making process. What IS evident is that there is an element who seems intent on stirring up the very contentions they are presently condemning.
http://www.moviemusic.com/mb/Forum1/HTML/011205-3.html
http://www.moviemusic.com/mb/Forum1/HTML/011617.html
http://www.moviemusic.com/mb/Forum1/HTML/012112-3.html
posted 12-26-2003 02:28 PM PT (US) 
Jeff78

Standard Userer

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=1 face=arial>quote:</font><HR size=1>Originally posted by Al:
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=1 face=arial>quote:</font><HR size=1>[b]Originally posted by Jeff78:It still boggles my mind that people take stuff personal over the internet.<HR size=1></BLOCKQUOTE>We're not exactly sending form letters back and forth on this message board, Jeff. It's still words written personally by real people to real people.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=1 face=arial>quote:</font><HR size=1>There are Goldsmith fans and there are Goldsmith fanboys.<HR size=1></BLOCKQUOTE>
The only difference I can see is that Goldsmith "fanboys" is just a word you use for the certain Goldsmith fans that get on your nerves. And if people can get on your nerves over the internet, then why should it boggle your mind that people take stuff personally over the internet?
NP: "Timeline" - Tyler[/B]<HR size=1></BLOCKQUOTE>Al, no where did I say they get on my nervous. I did not say anything like that at all. I find it funny actually. It's fun to watch people get all pissed off over something like this. Just like you, taking it personal and trying to go off on me.. lol.
In fact, one of my good friends is probably the biggest golsmith fanboy on here.
He knows who he is. =Þ
Jeff[Message edited by Jeff78 on 12-26-2003]
posted 12-26-2003 02:33 PM PT (US) 
Al

Standard Userer

Jeff, you don't need to say that fanboys get on your nerves. You've obviously been irritated enough to reply as you did, as it was with a roll-of-the-eyes sense of humor, but at the same time I'm not implying that they seriously get under your skin and cause thousands of nails to scratch across chalkboards in your mind.Also, don't assume that my reply was an attempt to "go off" on you. I wasn't pissed off; I only meant to express my view that people taking stuff personally over the internet doesn't exactly mean that they're acting irrationally and should therefore be laughed at.
posted 12-27-2003 07:07 PM PT (US) 
justin boggan

Standard Userer

I ... can't ... believe it. I certainly thought the costs (Cause I thought I remembered this being a LA recording...) would be too high and that they would decide against it. But now a deluxe!Can Varese confirm the rumor that Goldsmith actually wrote 2 scores, and the rumor did not specify if the second score written was just some score, or all score for the new cut.
I will buy this quickly. As a matter of fact, I hate to wait.
I hope they pressed enough copies.....
:-)
Gosh, you leave the board for 5 days and see what happenes ;-)
posted 12-29-2003 02:15 PM PT (US) 
Marian Schedenig

Standard Userer

Richard Donner said in an interview that Goldsmith practically rewrote the whole score, so I wouldn't classify that as a rumour. Whether he really wrote two entire scores I don't know.
posted 12-30-2003 04:29 AM PT (US) 
justin boggan

Standard Userer

Ah, so we're getting Timeline indeed ... nice. Now where's Elmer's Gangs Of New York?
posted 12-31-2003 07:56 AM PT (US) Old Infopop Software by UBB
