-
Message Boards

Movie Soundtracks
Shore scores King Kong
Archive of old forum. No more postings.
Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.
Author
Topic: Shore scores King Kong

moviescore

Oscar® Nominee

I posted this under another topic. In case you missed it:Howard Shore has now confirmed to Music from the Movies that he has indeed been asked by Peter Jackson to work on King Kong! http://www.musicfromthemovies.com
:-)
mikael
posted 05-24-2003 05:55 AM PT (US) 
Kevin
Oscar® Winner

Thanks for the info. You are the MAN!!!!!!!!
posted 05-24-2003 12:11 PM PT (US) 
Timmer

Oscar® Winner

Cool! Sounds like the right move to me, I'd like to see Shore kept on for all of Jackson's movies ala Williams/Spielberg!
posted 05-24-2003 07:54 PM PT (US) 
dgoldwas

Oscar® Winner

quote:
Originally posted by Timmer:
Cool! Sounds like the right move to me, I'd like to see Shore kept on for all of Jackson's movies ala Williams/Spielberg!Whereas Williams has scored almost all of Spielberg's films (except DUEL, THE COLOR PURPLE, and THE TWILIGHT ZONE), Jackson has only used Shore for 3 of his 10 features.
Dan
posted 05-24-2003 11:29 PM PT (US) 
Camillu

Oscar® Winner

He means from now on.
posted 05-25-2003 12:19 AM PT (US) 
workaluk

Oscar® Winner

Cool,this is very cooool,hope Shore delivers an adventure score for us to remember in the years to come.......
NP:Extreme Prejudice-Jerry Goldsmithposted 05-25-2003 03:28 AM PT (US) 
Marian Schedenig

Oscar® Winner

quote:
Originally posted by dgoldwas:
Jackson has only used Shore for 3 of his 10 features.What Camillu said, and:
- The Valley (76) - Dunno what that is, but I doubt it's a "feature film".
- Bad Taste - A feature film, but an unplanned one. Shot over years just for fun with some friends.
- Meet the Feebles - Which puts this in the positions of Spielberg's Duel I'd guess.
- Braindead
- Heavenly Creatures
- Forgotten Silver - Only co-directed by Jackson, so comparable to Twilight Zone, which wasn't scored by Williams.
- The Frighteners
- FOTR/TTT/ROTK
That leaves about three feature films so far not scored by Shore...for Spielberg it's Color Purple and possibly Poltergeist.

NP: Triology plays Morricone
[Message edited by Marian Schedenig on 05-25-2003]
posted 05-25-2003 03:38 AM PT (US) 
SFT

Oscar® Winner

Considering this film shouldn't be made in the first place I cannot say I am particularly exited about the score. But I am sure Shore will give us something interesting - although Steiner's effort will never be topped.SFT
posted 05-25-2003 03:38 AM PT (US) 
Timmer

Oscar® Winner

quote:
Originally posted by Camillu:
He means from now on.Thanks for straightening that out Mark

posted 05-25-2003 06:56 AM PT (US) 
Camillu

Oscar® Winner

No problem Timmer. It was the tiny word 'kept' that got me on the right track...
posted 05-25-2003 08:25 AM PT (US) 
Quill
Oscar® Winner

I don't see any reason it shouldn't be made. There is always room for improvement, and with Jackson involved I don't it will simply be a gold-digging exercise.If he brings even half of the passion to the project that he mustered for LOTR then it should be a worth-while movie-going experience.
Oh...and great news about Shore!
posted 05-25-2003 10:55 AM PT (US) 
SFT

Oscar® Winner

There is always room for improvement? I don't think so. Some films should just be left alone. Instead of re-hashing old concepts, Hollywood should start coming up with some new stuff. Especially when talented directors such as Peter Jackson are involved. Where are the fresh, new ideas? Have they really been left entirely to the Europeans???SFT
posted 05-25-2003 11:27 AM PT (US) 
Camillu

Oscar® Winner

I agree. There are way too many sequels and remakes coming out nowadays. This summer's line-up is unbelievable in that respect.We need more Mementos and Moulin Rouges.
Having said that, I also tend to agree with previous comments about how Jackson isn't just gold-digging. It's quite widely known that he holds the original in the utmost respect, so I'm eager to see what he can do.
posted 05-25-2003 11:47 AM PT (US) 
franz_conrad

Oscar® Winner

I heard of a concept film that Jackson had hopes to direct that was essentially a ghost story set on the front lines of World War I. Given the eerie trench-based setting, that's an idea that has a lot of mileage in the hands of a director as adept at genre film-making. Very much in the spirit of Below (which I never saw but will catch up with one day) and The Keep (one of Michael Mann's lesser films, but interesting nonetheless). And if Howard Shore came along for the ride, I'm sure we'd have a score well worth listening to.Having said that, I would go and see just about anything Jackson makes. It's evident from those parts of Lord of the Rings that most clearly show his influence that he's in heaven making smart films that feature some obvious humour about not-so-obvious subjects (anyone heard the one about the short dwarf?) and a good bash-up (no evidence needed). Monster films provide opportunities for him to indulge in both joys simultaneously, plus his latent desire to remake the cinematic world in the image of Ray Harryhausen. And if you are going to remake any classic monster film, King Kong is the Holy Grail. I guess one would allow oneself a little room for arrogance (think of it as a remake of North by Northwest or Vertigo, which noone has dared to attempt) if one had made a successful adaptation of the most popular literary fantasy work in history.
NP Scarlet Letter (Barry)
posted 05-25-2003 03:16 PM PT (US) 
CAT

Oscar® Nominee

I am eagerly awaiting to see how Jackson will handle this, my favorite classic horror film. I am also anticipating something very special from Shore.The one thing I can't help but wonder is:
#1 Kong - Empire State Building
#2 Kong - Twin Towers, WTC
#3 Kong - ??? At what NYC edifice will the
great ape meet his demise this time?CAT
[Message edited by CAT on 05-25-2003]
posted 05-25-2003 03:37 PM PT (US) 
Hornerfan

Oscar® Winner

quote:
Originally posted by CAT:
I am eagerly awaiting to see how Jackson will handle this, my favorite classic horror film. I am also anticipating something very special from Shore.The one thing I can't help but wonder is:
#1 Kong - Empire State Building
#2 Kong - Twin Towers, WTC
#3 Kong - ??? At what NYC edifice will the
great ape meet his demise this time?CAT
[Message edited by CAT on 05-25-2003]
The Chrysler Building, perhaps?
Mike
posted 05-25-2003 10:52 PM PT (US) 
dgoldwas

Oscar® Winner

quote:
Originally posted by CAT:
The one thing I can't help but wonder is:
#1 Kong - Empire State Building
#2 Kong - Twin Towers, WTC
#3 Kong - ??? At what NYC edifice will the
great ape meet his demise this time?As Peter Jackson has stated repeatedly, the film he's making is a remake of the 1933 version, and takes place in 1933. As such, I would expect it to end on the Empire State Building, as the original did (and as the 1996 script did).
Dan
posted 05-25-2003 11:00 PM PT (US) 
CAT

Oscar® Nominee

quote:
Originally posted by dgoldwas:
As Peter Jackson has stated repeatedly, the film he's making is a remake of the 1933 version, and takes place in 1933. As such, I would expect it to end on the Empire State Building, as the original did (and as the 1996 script did).Dan[/B]
Dan, you obviously have more time and better resources than myself to keep abreast of all the latest on upcoming films and music. Point in case..I had no idea a remake of King Kong was even being considered until I read this post.
I thank you for your input and all the other information that has been provided amongst this thread. That's why I come here! And now, from what I've learned, I am even more anxious to see the remake of this classic! Best Regards...
CATposted 05-27-2003 01:21 PM PT (US) Old Infopop Software by UBB
- The Valley (76) - Dunno what that is, but I doubt it's a "feature film".
