The MovieMusic Store shopping cart   |  sign in
    SEARCH  
  • Home
  • Browse Store
    • New Soundtrack CDs
    • Top Sellers
    • Low Price New CDs
    • Used CDs
    • Soundtrack Compilations
    • Score Composers
    • Soundtrack Labels
    • Soundtracks by Year
    • ... detailed search page
  • Store Info
    • Happy Customers!
    • $1 Shipping
    • Accepted Payment Methods
    • Safe Shopping Guarantee
    • Shipping Rates & Policies
    • Our Privacy Policy
    • About Us
  • Help Center
    • My Account
    • How to Order
    • Search Tips
    • Return/Refund Policy
    • Cancelling Your Order
    • Contact the Store
  • The Lobby
  •   Message Boards
      Movie Soundtracks
      THE IMPENDING MEDIOCRITY OF INDY McBEAL? (Page 2)

    Archive of old forum. No more postings.

    Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.


    This topic is 2 pages long: 1 2
    Author
    Topic:   THE IMPENDING MEDIOCRITY OF INDY McBEAL?

     Quill
     Goldmember
     

    I've got a solution...Andre--just call yourself an American too. No one in our country will be upset, and certainly no one will vehemently decry the notion as often and as grating as you do.

    And Marian, your point is understood, but you're only helping a dead topic gain legs again.

    Back on topic...IndyIV will be an entertaining couple of hours--of that I have no doubt.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 07-20-2002 08:09 PM PT (US)     

     Al
     Click Here to Email Al
     Goldmember
     

    And the main theme will feature the Raiders theme over some Tan-Dun Crouching Tiger percussion.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 07-20-2002 11:00 PM PT (US)     

     Marian Schedenig
     Click Here to Email Marian Schedenig
     Goldmember
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by Quill:
    And Marian, your point is understood, but you're only helping a dead topic gain legs again.

    I will stop, then. Though I see truth in both Scott's arguments and mine, and was trying to explain what the situation looks like from a non-US POV.

    One more thing though: It's most certainly not jealousy that made André complain.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 07-21-2002 06:51 AM PT (US)     

     Lancelot
     Click Here to Email Lancelot
     Goldmember
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by Al:
    And the main theme will feature the Raiders theme over some Tan-Dun Crouching Tiger percussion.

    Really? I've lost all hope for the Indiana Jones Franchise! I better start a protest petition, or create a whole new post....Does Williams even care anymore? Thank god for Howard Shore...

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 07-21-2002 08:35 AM PT (US)     

     scoreguy16
     Click Here to Email scoreguy16
     Goldmember
     

    Lets see, the film is supposed to come out in 2005. Now, we're sitting here 3 years before the film is released and some of you are already bitching about it when the script isn't even finished yet. You can't complain about the actors because you don't even know if they're signed in to do it yet. That would depend on the script, not what some 'reporter' says. And there's still 3 years until it's release. Therefore, how can we complain about the music we haven't heard and the acting we haven't seen? Does anyone even know what this film is about? I got an idea, wait until we get closer to the film's release date, and then complain.

    Clayton

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 07-21-2002 09:11 AM PT (US)     

     Tristan
     Click Here to Email Tristan
     Goldmember
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by Lancelot:
    <BLOCKQUOTE><font size=1 face=arial>quote:</font><HR size=1>Originally posted by Al:
    [b]And the main theme will feature the Raiders theme over some Tan-Dun Crouching Tiger percussion.
    <HR size=1></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Really? I've lost all hope for the Indiana Jones Franchise! I better start a protest petition, or create a whole new post....Does Williams even care anymore? Thank god for Howard Shore...[/B]


    Okay, this mocking is getting a little irritating.

    First of all, Williams(as I stated earlier if you had paid attention) is the only thing consistently good in the STAR WARS series. It was George Lucas that I am targeting.

    I am also targeting those banal standards that are being accepted by people like you. Many here said not to worry when the EPISODE II trailer came out with its horrible dialogue. And I remind you from my earlier post, here's what we got :

    "Remember who gave us the fifties diner scene in the STAR WARS Universe, tracked video game music in the movie to replace original score, implemented use of the banal and now tired MATRIX cliche, and allowed lines like "What a drag" to actually be filmed."

    E.T. revision...Here's what we got:

    Digitally enhanced added scenes which look horrible filled with 2002 stunt doubles which don't even look like the original actors. Ridiculous P.C. replacements like walkie talkies.

    The Calista deal COULD happen. I am basing this on the fact that horrible decisions have been made by the Lucas/Spielberg team in recent years. This could be another one of them. The concept of the Force has been made into a biological explanation for God's sake!!! Do even pay attention to how bad CGI + Live Action scenes like the diner scene in Episode II look. You must be blind and deaf since apparently you think the dialogue was fine, as well.

    What I should be asking is,"Don't you guys care about movies anymore?" They might as well throw Dr. Who up on the screen. You would go nuts for it.

    I have standards. They're a good thing to have by the way. Especially when you are paying 6-10 bucks for a freakin' movie nowadays. I expect a little bit higher quality than what's on the boob tube for that price.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 07-21-2002 12:17 PM PT (US)     

     Lancelot
     Click Here to Email Lancelot
     Goldmember
     

    quote:

    Okay, this mocking is getting a little irritating.

    I'm not the biggest fan of sarcasm, though I am a client. More of a cynic, actually. The exaggeration was intended to parody the way these things get blown out of proportion in the first place. (The parodied comment was sardonic as well, so I felt like I wasn't doing any further damage....)

    quote:
    First of all, Williams(as I stated earlier if you had paid attention) is the only thing consistently good in the STAR WARS series.

    That's an opinion. I don't disagree with you, but I don't agree with you entirely, either. Which is more to say, I agree that John Williams is consistantly good, and is a good presence in the STAR WARS series. In one aspect, I think that John Williams IS the STAR WARS series. Only one aspect, however, though a serious one, which is why I don't indulge jibes like "dump Williams, keep the themes, and see what Don Davis (e.g.) would do."

    quote:
    It was George Lucas that I am targeting. I am also targeting those banal standards that are being accepted by people like you.

    With respects, you have no idea what a person-like-me is, so you have no idea what my standards are, and also with respects, I would appreciate not being associated with whatever group you think you are criticizing. This isn't as simple as "Smoking or Non-Smoking?"

    True, what you may consider banal I may consider wonderous, but that doesn't place you at any superior level.

    quote:
    The Calista deal COULD happen.

    And a meteor the size of Texas COULD crash into Earth. Have we come here to prophetize and theorize? Or are we just having a discussion?

    quote:

    I am basing this on the fact that horrible decisions have been made by the Lucas/Spielberg team in recent years. This could be another one of them. The concept of the Force has been made into a biological explanation for God's sake!!!

    So this is really about being a disgruntled fan? (As opposed to a "gruntled fan", I surmise.) You haven't really thought about why that choice was made, only that you think it should not have been.

    quote:
    Do [audiences/producers/you/you all?] even pay attention to how bad CGI + Live Action scenes like the diner scene in Episode II look.

    By whose estimation and based on what? What we're getting at is the "suspension of disbelief", and some of us have a harder time with it than others.

    quote:
    You must be blind and deaf since apparently you think the dialogue was fine, as well.

    Now you're just name-calling.

    Apparently? Based on...?

    quote:
    What I should be asking is,"Don't you guys care about movies anymore?" They might as well throw Dr. Who up on the screen. You would go nuts for it.

    Never was a Dr. Who devotee, but I've met some who are. Sure, I care about movies. I don't have a lot of preconceptions about them, though. (I said a lot. I do have some.) I understand what they are, and have a pretty good idea of how they're made, and the work that goes into them. Enjoying movies is sort of like learning a different language, though. Not everyone understands.

    quote:
    I have standards. They're a good thing to have by the way.

    So stipulated.

    quote:
    Especially when you are paying 6-10 bucks for a freakin' movie nowadays. I expect a little bit higher quality than what's on the boob tube for that price.

    Well, I'm not going to apologize for that--it sounds like you chose the movie, you paid the 6-10 bucks. Maybe you think we should pay for the movie after seeing it? I think if you're not getting your standards met, you should probably either:

    1. Stop going to movies.
    2. Start writing movies yourself, so that you can maintain your standards, and audiences can rave and/or criticize about them on message boards like this one.

    Otherwise, it's going to be a pretty unfulfilling life.

    I recognize Peter Kelly's rules around here for reprinting previously published material on the board, though there is something interesting in the latest edition of Premiere which speaks a little bit about this sort of disenchantment that some feel over the topic at hand.

    [Message edited by Lancelot on 07-21-2002]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 07-21-2002 02:10 PM PT (US)     

     Al
     Click Here to Email Al
     Goldmember
     

    My comment was hardly meant to be bitter.

    Anyone see that wink and a smile above it?

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 07-21-2002 08:46 PM PT (US)     

     Lancelot
     Click Here to Email Lancelot
     Goldmember
     

    Not bitter, Al, and not taken so. I responded in kind (though sans happy/winky face.)

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 07-21-2002 08:58 PM PT (US)     

     Al
     Click Here to Email Al
     Goldmember
     

    It wasn't as much your calling my comment sardonic, Lancelot, as it was the short-tempered response from others, who either don't know what jokes are, or don't know how to take one.


    NW: Once Upon A Time In The West

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 07-22-2002 09:02 AM PT (US)     

     André Lux
     Click Here to Email André Lux
     Goldmember
     


    quote:
    Originally posted by Tristan:

    Okay, It was George Lucas that I am targeting.

    I am also targeting those banal standards that are being accepted by people like you. Many here said not to worry when the EPISODE II trailer came out with its horrible dialogue. And I remind you from my earlier post, here's what we got :


    Reading this typical rancorous-pseudo-intellectual remarks one can get to the impression that the original STAR WARS movies had impressive dialogues, strong performances and revolutionary storytelling...

    How can't we mock it??


    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 07-22-2002 01:30 PM PT (US)     
     

    Old Infopop Software by UBB

    © 1998-2011, The MovieMusic Company