-
Message Boards

Movie Soundtracks
No doubt, Varese Sarabande Rules! (Page 1)
Archive of old forum. No more postings.
Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.
This topic is 2 pages long: 1 2Author
Topic: No doubt, Varese Sarabande Rules!

David Maxx

Goldmember

Today, I took a look at some of my Varese Sarabande CDs, listened to them, and was once again reminded of how much of love their company! Other companies have a couple good qualities, but Varese has them all!#1..........Best Packaging!
#2..........Excellent Sound!
#3..........Incredible Deluxe Editions!
#4..........Delicious Club Releases!
#5..........More good releases than any other company! (over half the CDs in my collection are from Varese Sarabande)
#6..........Goes through hellish re-use fees for the fans!
I just love the feeling of walking into a store and picking up a brand-new sealed Varese CD. There are some CDs that are packaged so well, I wish I wanted them (i.e. THE TIME MACHINE).
There are many CDs that I have purchased mainly because it was a Varese CD. However, I made sure I at least remotely liked the score. For example, if it were not for them I would never have purchased their FROM HELL album. I liked the score a little bit, so that helped. Besides, I feel I owe it to Varese Sarabande to purchase their releases. They've done so much.
If I ever become a composer, I am going to try to have every commerical release produced by Varese Sarabande!
[Message edited by David Maxx on 06-09-2002]
posted 06-09-2002 02:57 AM PT (US) 
Marian Schedenig

Goldmember

#1..........Best Packaging!That goes to RCA for the SW:SE:LEs.
#2..........Excellent Sound!
Varies. Since the recording is done primarily for the movie, I don't think Varese have a lot of influecene on that. I agree though that the Deluxe Editions sound spectacular - but then, most of them are Goldsmith (i.e. recorded by Bruce Botnick), and Aliens was recorded by Shawn Murphy I believe (who was still great at that time), so it's no surprise they sound great.
#3..........Incredible Deluxe Editions!
Let's hope they'll do Great Train Robbery soon!
#4..........Delicious Club Releases!
I still don't have any of them.

#5..........More good releases than any other company! (over half the CDs in my collection are from Varese Sarabande)
#6..........Goes through hellish re-use fees for the fans!
Which is why all the bitching about their 30 minute releases is just stupid. I don't like 30 minute releases either, but it's still better than nothing.
posted 06-09-2002 05:10 AM PT (US) 
ManOfSorrows

Goldmember

I don't feel that they have the best packaging, quite amateurish if you ask me, but they are OK. Everyone looks the same, some variation would be nice.
posted 06-09-2002 05:32 AM PT (US) 
Marian Schedenig

Goldmember

It's called "corporate design".
Big classical labels like Deutsche Grammophon also use the same design for all their CDs, which makes them look very nice in the shelf. I didn't like Varese's old purple/brownish spines, but the new ones are fine.NP: Raiders of the Lost Ark (John Williams)
posted 06-09-2002 06:40 AM PT (US) 
ManOfSorrows

Goldmember

Naxos are the same, uhh.. they are reeeal ugly.
posted 06-09-2002 06:56 AM PT (US) 
Marian Schedenig

Goldmember

Naxos CDs look as cheap as they are.
They still do have some excellent albums though.
posted 06-09-2002 07:09 AM PT (US) 
BobaMike

Goldmember

I miss Varese's old brown spines...they were easier to find in used cd stores and bargain bins!
BobaMike
posted 06-09-2002 07:35 AM PT (US) 
Shaun Rutherford

Goldmember

Jesus, and I thought Jeron was an asskisser.I think Varese's discs have bowed to the "all-digital, less-volume" brigade (something Townson apparently appreciates, given his POS Scottish re-recordings), as after listening to Elektra's The Sum Of All Fears, which is mixed BEAUTIFULLY, I somehow doubt it would've sounded this loud on a Varese disc. Every new Goldsmith score that they release is in the "turn it up 5 notches" pile.
Pardon me while I vomit profusely,
Shaunposted 06-09-2002 09:32 AM PT (US) 
JJH

Goldmember

the best packaging of any CDs I own goes to the BYU/ FMA set of CDs.
Just look at Dodge City/ The Oklahoma Kidto find out.
Varese's From Hell is one of the best sounding CDs I have.
NP -- Mary Reilly, Fentonposted 06-09-2002 10:10 AM PT (US) 
El Cid
Goldmember

quote:
Originally posted by Shaun Rutherford:
I think Varese's discs have bowed to the "all-digital, less-volume" brigade (something Townson apparently appreciates, given his POS Scottish re-recordings), as after listening to Elektra's The Sum Of All Fears, which is mixed BEAUTIFULLY, I somehow doubt it would've sounded this loud on a Varese disc. Every new Goldsmith score that they release is in the "turn it up 5 notches" pile.Pardon me while I vomit profusely,
What's the problem, is your volume control broken?
posted 06-09-2002 10:41 AM PT (US) 
MillsSomerset
Goldmember

I agree wholeheartedly.Look, I don't get into 'rerecording' and sound mix and crap like that, I'm just in it for having the actual score. Were I more musically knowledgeable, perhaps, but I'm just a film-score junkie and that's that.
So, for me, going out on release day (tuesday) is not about "oooh, the latest set of random songs not on the last album is out from that group!" it's "sweet, the INSOMNIA score!".
And I, too, have over half Varese in my collection, they were the reason I got into it by being able to own LEVIATHAN or THE FLY II and listen to them over and over,r ather than trying to tape them off of the videotapes I had and make a really crappy homemade score...
I actually much prefer the old brown spines, for much the same reason someone above brought up - much easier to find in Used shops or places that don't have the newer ways of peeling through CD's in the racks. I still to this day am able to find stuff in used bins or markdown or 'all encompassing ya takes what ya finds' boxes, etc...just the other day, I found a real rarity just by happening to glance thru such a bin. The few non-score artists/albums I've been seeking are much much much harder to find b/c they don't have something simple as Ye Olde Brown Label to look for. I'm just not aesthetically comfy w/that white (with tiny brown smudge at the corner) new Varese Label yet. But it's a small thing to bitch about so I shan't...
Everyone's got their reasons for buying/not buying/not liking something, but I try to lap up pretty much every score I can unless A) I know it to be all crashing stuff or very synthy stuff, unless I happened to like it in the movie, B) it's a composer I just cannot listen to (of which there's hardly a one, but a couple I don't prefer who shall remain nameless)...to the point where I'm usually buying scores before I even see the movie, something else Varese got me to do, b/c I'm such a fan of score music. So that they can work over and above whatever crappy movie they might be in - being that I see like 80 percent of everything that comes out, eventually I'll hear the score and go "yeah, it works in this film" or "wow, this film is bad but the score's ok", etc. I rarely return anything and if i'm even at all iffy I do tend to give it a listen before I buy - for example, no matter how many times i see that ADVENTURES OF HUCK FINN Bill Conti cd, i can't bring myself to buy it...no matter how low the markdown gets!
Just some varese thoughts. Peace.
PS You know what does bug about Varese - they put out other stuff! LOL I always get momentarily thrilled when I find one in the used rack, only to then discover it's like "The Best of Anne Murray". Oh well.
posted 06-09-2002 12:04 PM PT (US) 
jonathan_little
Goldmember

I still think Varese CDs are too expensive for what they are. Their 30-40 minute releases and re-recordings should be in the $11 range.
posted 06-09-2002 12:16 PM PT (US) 
Dinko

Goldmember

yup. Varèses titles: too much $$ for little product. Which is why I haven't bought any Varèse titles for months.For the price of a (regular) Varèse Sarabande disc, I get a Chandos CD. With superior sound, excellent performances, superior artwork, and superior liner notes... (though I'm not sure how Chanods liner notes can be superior to Varèse liner notes since you can't compare "something" with "nothing")
[Message edited by Dinko on 06-09-2002]
posted 06-09-2002 04:09 PM PT (US) 
Shaun Rutherford

Goldmember

The "volume control" comment is frustrating. Put Unbreakable, Krull, Crimson Tide, Hollow Man, and Monsters, Inc. on shuffle. Say this whole shuffle process begins with Crimson Tide. You set the volume at a "normal" setting, such as say, 30. Playing Crimson Tide on 30 is fine. The next track is the "Weightlifting" cue from Unbreakable. You have to crank it to 40-45. That cue ends, and the "Fire Mares" cue from Krull comes on. Back to 30, 35 or so. Next, Hollow Man's "This Is Science" begins......or does it? Changing the volume to 45 makes it audible.Long story short, I can't believe nobody else understands this damned volume thing.
Shaun
posted 06-09-2002 05:14 PM PT (US) 
Kosh

Goldmember

Well, I'm gonna join the Maxx tribe and say I enjoy Varèse's releases, since everybody is always picking on the company about this and this and that, and "oh! that sucks! I wouldn't do that!" and "the CDs are too expensive! If I were president of Varèse, I'd sell all the CDs for 5 bucks each!" and "they don't release enough".Guys.
Come on.
I applaud Varèse for releasing A LOT of scores that would never see the light of CD day, and for releasing more than they used to. True, some years ago, they seemed to be only releasing 25-minute albums, but I have to applaud them for releasing more music in each single scores on average, or so it appears to me.
I say kuddos and shame on everyone who has to nitpick them all the time and cry like babies because their personal preferences aren't answered by a company which, should you need to be remembered, does not need to put itself out there and actually release this kind of music that only few people actually buy.
Koshposted 06-09-2002 05:32 PM PT (US) 
jonathan_little
Goldmember

Hello? Shame on me? Varese Sarabande is a business. Last I knew, Bob Townsend wasn't a philanthropist. He's not releasing these things out of the goodness of his heart-- he's doing it to make money. I support the business by purchasing their CDs. Shame on me.Shaun, I think I understand the "volume thing," and this is my cure to it:
- Don't mix and match CDs since we're never going to have a standard recording style. Recordings by Dennis Sands are going to sound vastly different than those of Dan Wallin. This is a fact of life and will require different volume adjustments on your equipment.
Every time I do a "mix CD," I have to mess around with the volume of every track before I burn the thing. It's a pain, but a fact of life. Some recordings have more dynamics than others. - For the Scottish recordings, turn the volume up so you can comfortably hear the quiet parts of the score, and then really enjoy it when the orchestra struts their stuff. Your neighbors might not like it, but oh well.
posted 06-09-2002 07:08 PM PT (US) 
El Cid
Goldmember

quote:
Originally posted by Shaun Rutherford:
The "volume control" comment is frustrating. Put Unbreakable, Krull, Crimson Tide, Hollow Man, and Monsters, Inc. on shuffle.You might as well blame Varese for the weather. That's just how CDs work. You could blame them if you had to change volume when listening to tracks on the *same* CD, but that's not your complaint.
BTW, many PC music players have a auto-volume-control feature which attempts to match subjective loudness between tracks. I don't know if consumer CD changers have this feature or not.
posted 06-09-2002 07:20 PM PT (US) 
Shaun Rutherford

Goldmember

How do I put this? Listening to a score by James Newton Howard from 1995, then listening to a James Newton Howard score from 2000 shows you that either recording engineers have grown extremely noise-sensitive or that digital technology just blows ass.It's hard to put into words, I guess.
Shaun
posted 06-09-2002 07:46 PM PT (US) 
Shaun Rutherford

Goldmember

Oh, and by the way, it rained today. F*CK YOU, VARESE!Shaun
posted 06-09-2002 07:46 PM PT (US) 
BMikeJ

Goldmember

I think that the examples that Shaun mentions might be attributed to an engineer listening to all of his work on computer speakers and not listening on regular speakers. There IS a sound difference. I'm still amazed at how poorly albums like Unbreakable and Snow Falling On Cedars sound. But, again, I think the reason these sorts of things happen is due to the increasingly rushed schedule to get the music finished in time to be mixed into the sound track.
posted 06-09-2002 08:06 PM PT (US) 
Beatty

Goldmember


Just in case this topic accidentally strays into relevancy, I'll just add that I never cared for the font that was used on the maroon spines. There's my filthy pipsqueak of a complaint. The rest is silence.NP Men With Guns
http://appleogue.net/filmscorereviewsblog/posted 06-09-2002 08:58 PM PT (US) 
David Maxx

Goldmember

I used to hate the new design and wished they would go back to the old one. I also loved their former black & silver CD label design. But, as time went by, I found that their new design is much better. In fact, I practically do not care for the old design at all.
posted 06-09-2002 10:51 PM PT (US) 
JJH

Goldmember

The old spines are easy to spot in used bins, but the old ones are just as easy, anyway.BTW -- anyone notice that on the Last Orders CD, Varese misspelled Paul Grabowsky's name on the spine, but have it spelled on the back insert? weird.
NP -- King of Kings, Rozsaposted 06-09-2002 11:26 PM PT (US) 
Dinko

Goldmember

quote:
Originally posted by El Cid:
You might as well blame Varese for the weather. That's just how CDs work.Ok. So how come "some" companies manage to make it work better than others? If that's "just how CDs work" then all CDs should sound like **** .
Let's leave Varèse Sarabande out of it. Let's take another company with the same "low volume" crap: EMI Classics.
Old EMI discs sound great. New EMI stuff sounds like **** . The recorded sound is perfect. The CD volume is awful: it's inaudible.
So how come Chandos, Deutsche Grammophon and Sony Classical can make CDs which are perfectly recorded, and have higher CD volume, but EMI can't? Easy: they don't want to. Different opinions. Apparently, EMI thinks that everyone gets to live in a house separated from all civilization, equiped with a 10000W sound system where they can push up the volume as high as they want without fearing the wrath of neighbors.Same goes for much of Varèse Sarabande stuff. Their Scottish rerecordings are perfectly engineered. But the volume mastering is purely and simply bad.
Low CD volume is not "just how CDs work". It's a choice made by record labels and CD producers.
posted 06-10-2002 07:13 AM PT (US) 
MWRuger

Goldmember

I can’t believe that nobody but Dinko has commented on the rather non-existent nature of the liner notes on most Varese regular releases. Almost everyone does a better job on liner notes than Varese.In my view, Varese has taken the route of “bare bones” release for most of their score releases. But who the hell cares? They probably do that so they can release as much as possible, as cheaply as possible to make as much money as possible. That is a fair balance in my view, one I wish a lot more companies would pursue.
I buy scores based on the score, not the company who produced it. I have a lot Varese scores because they release a lot of scores.
posted 06-10-2002 11:48 AM PT (US) 
Richard Street

Goldmember

If memory serves, Varese changed their soundtracks from the red-brown to the white to better fit their scarily large archive of bluegrass, folk, chanting, surfing pop and singing cowboys.I'm afraid I'm of the "40 minutes of Scorpion King is better than none" school (or more accurately, "40 minutes of legitimate, licensed Scorpion King and a few black and white stills is much better than 85 minutes of stolen edits from a pirated DVD from the far East slung together in 86 minutes by a 15-year-old onto two CDRs with at best some colour inkjet inlay sheets for the same price"). And while someone else might have picked up Scorpion King (not that I'm holding my breath for it that much) no-one else is going to bother with Last Orders, Fierce Creatures, Jawbreaker or Halloween 6/7/8, or yet more Marco Beltrami...
Oh, and my rating is 29.5% (number of Varese / number in collection).

NP: LONE WOLF McQUADE (Francesco De Masi) - Varese re-released this one, but I have the Italian Beat CD. I want more music like this.
[Message edited by Richard Street on 06-10-2002]
posted 06-10-2002 12:40 PM PT (US) 
Steve Hughes

Goldmember

Apologies (Dan) is somebody has already posted this, but Varese are releasing John Ottman's score to Eight Legged Freaks on 23rd of July. Daddy cool.
posted 06-10-2002 02:26 PM PT (US) 
El Cid
Goldmember

quote:
Originally posted by Dinko:
Ok. So how come "some" companies manage to make it work better than others? If that's "just how CDs work" then all CDs should sound like **** .
Let's leave Varèse Sarabande out of it. Let's take another company with the same "low volume" crap: EMI Classics.
Old EMI discs sound great. New EMI stuff sounds like **** . The recorded sound is perfect. The CD volume is awful: it's inaudible.
So how come Chandos, Deutsche Grammophon and Sony Classical can make CDs which are perfectly recorded, and have higher CD volume, but EMI can't? Easy: they don't want to. Different opinions. Apparently, EMI thinks that everyone gets to live in a house separated from all civilization, equiped with a 10000W sound system where they can push up the volume as high as they want without fearing the wrath of neighbors.All music does not - should not - have the same dynamic range. It's part of the music. Why should everything be dumbed down to sound good in the car or for "late at night" listening?
posted 06-10-2002 03:51 PM PT (US) 
Dinko

Goldmember

It shouldn't.But many albums have high dynamic ranges without falling into the inaudible category.
You can have CDs with "normal" volume levels, and high dynamic ranges.
You can also have CDs with high dynamic ranges and no volume.(and BTW, some car systems are better than many home systems...
Stuff I can't listen to at home, I get to pump up in the car. )posted 06-10-2002 06:08 PM PT (US) 
Shaun Rutherford

Goldmember

I believe the line about computer speakers pretty much sums up my feelings toward sound recording techniques of today. It's either too damned quiet or too damned loud, with no in-between.Shaun
posted 06-11-2002 02:45 PM PT (US) 
MWRuger

Goldmember

Most sound guys don't use speakers to mix sound. They use headphones. I have a couple of friends in the biz and unless they have a recording studio to listen in, they use headphones.The problem is that some sound guys are pinheads.
posted 06-11-2002 04:26 PM PT (US) 
David Maxx

Goldmember

Guys, I started this thread to talk about how good Varese Sarabande is. If you want to continue this debate about sound, go here....
http://www.moviemusic.com/mb/Forum1/HTML/009552.html[Message edited by David Maxx on 06-11-2002]
posted 06-11-2002 04:52 PM PT (US) 
jonathan_little
Goldmember

quote:
Originally posted by El Cid:
All music does not - should not - have the same dynamic range. It's part of the music. Why should everything be dumbed down to sound good in the car or for "late at night" listening?Exactly.
posted 06-11-2002 04:58 PM PT (US) 
David Maxx

Goldmember

Post Deleted by David Maxx on 6-16-02[Message edited by David Maxx on 06-11-2002]
posted 06-11-2002 06:20 PM PT (US) 
Beatty

Goldmember

quote:
Originally posted by David Maxx:
This thread is about how good Varese Sarabande is, not about problems with sound.There's no way to control the course of a thread. That's both a good and a bad thing.
Good because you generally want to encourage conversation, bad because sometimes the topicicity is lost, sometimes even to the point od the thread being hi-jacked to forward some one person's agenda or obsession.
It might make more sense to remind others of the benefits of staying on topic in a separate thread.
posted 06-11-2002 06:23 PM PT (US) 
jonathan_little
Goldmember

Did you guys hear that Ransom/Chairman CD? Damn, that thing sounds like poop!NP: Franz Waxman: Legends of Hollywood Volume 2
posted 06-11-2002 09:11 PM PT (US) 
MWRuger

Goldmember

Well, we talked about Varese and offered our opinions, good and bad.Now we are discussing sound, a natural outgrowth of Shaun's comments on what he perceived as "bad" sound on some Varese releases.
It is an organic outgrowth of what you started, What's the problem?
But if it makes you happy, I like Varese releases despite what I perceive as flaws.
If it makes you happy, I like Varese releases despite what I percieve as flaws.posted 06-11-2002 09:15 PM PT (US) 
Shaun Rutherford

Goldmember

David, please don't tell us all what to do.I think Varese, especially recently, has started to just release every shyt score for every shyt movie, and so long as it keeps the funding alive for the club stuff, that's cool. That doesn't mean they're the best label ever.
Shaun
posted 06-11-2002 10:17 PM PT (US) 
David Maxx

Goldmember

Shaun, I am telling you people what to do because you are screwing up my thread. You wanna complain about sound, then do it on the forum I set up for you, because this thread was not created for that purpose.If you don't like Varese Sarabande, that's fine, but don't bring down a topic because of such.
[Message edited by David Maxx on 06-11-2002]
posted 06-11-2002 10:25 PM PT (US) 
Tim_P

Goldmember

"...but don't screw up my thread"That sounds like an invitation to me!
WHO HERE LIKES PANCAKES?!
AND WHAT DO YOU TOP YOUR PANCAKES WITH?posted 06-11-2002 10:29 PM PT (US) Old Infopop Software by UBB
- Don't mix and match CDs since we're never going to have a standard recording style. Recordings by Dennis Sands are going to sound vastly different than those of Dan Wallin. This is a fact of life and will require different volume adjustments on your equipment.
