-
Message Boards

Movie Soundtracks
AOTC score/CD differences.... (Page 1)
Archive of old forum. No more postings.
Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.
This topic is 2 pages long: 1 2Author
Topic: AOTC score/CD differences....

dgoldwas

Goldmember

So what's the other hour of music like?Well... more of the same. But there's a lot more use of the Emperor's theme, Anakin's theme, and stuff like that.
The CD, though, is now somewhat of a mess. (My review is gonna be harder than I thought.) Like PHANTOM MENACE ("The Arrival at Naboo"), cue names on the album ("Ambush on Coruscant") don't always go where you would think they would go in the film.... it's not the music used in the ambush (for example) - it's used elsewhere.
Some observations (possible spoilers - but I'll try not to):
Parts of "The Chase through Coruscant" show up in the climax of the film.
The electric guitar is barely noticible (thankfully drowned out by sound effects).
The use of "Duel of the Fates" is great, and works exactly where it works in the trailer (the speederbike against the sunset).
There was no music for the asteroid chase.
I could swear that "Han and Leah's Theme" showed up briefly during the conveyer belt sequence.
A huge segment of the climax is tracked with "The Droid Invasion" and "The Droid Battle" from TPM.
I didn't like the use of "The Imperial March" on Tatooine when Anakin cries - but I liked it at the end (on the album).
So what will the inevitable expanded 2-CD set later this year contain? I honestly don't know.... it might be just like the Ultimate TPM....
Dan
[Message edited by dgoldwas on 05-08-2002]
posted 05-08-2002 10:25 AM PT (US) 
Will

Goldmember

I'm hoping for a sad theme (like the one in TPM when Anakin leaves his mother) to recur in Tatooine...
posted 05-08-2002 10:33 AM PT (US) 
MarkA

Goldmember

Thanks for the score info but you forgot to mention one thing -- how was the movie?
posted 05-08-2002 10:36 AM PT (US) 
dgoldwas

Goldmember

quote:
Originally posted by MarkA:
Thanks for the score info but you forgot to mention one thing -- how was the movie?
LOL - I knew I forgot something!!

The movie was GOOD. Not GREAT, but definitely a hell of a lot better than Episode 1. It was pretty solid, and never dull. The action was great, the acting was whatever (Lucas.... grrr....), and the love-story was a little forced.... But overall, this is a good film.
Dan
posted 05-08-2002 10:45 AM PT (US) 
dgoldwas

Goldmember

quote:
Originally posted by Will:
I'm hoping for a sad theme (like the one in TPM when Anakin leaves his mother) to recur in Tatooine...Umm... why? It doesn't really fit in the story.... you'll see.... there's plenty of "sad" moments....
Dan
posted 05-08-2002 10:46 AM PT (US) 
JeffBond

Goldmember

I gotta say Williams' score was BRUTALIZED in the movie. Mixed low and sliced and diced like crazy, with several jarringly ugly music edits (as in "The Meadow Picnic").A lot of the film was flat like The Phantom Menace but the script was good. Acting was a mixed bag but the good performances (Hayden Christensen, McGregor, the wonderful Christopher Lee and even Jimmy Smits) outweighed the bad (that would be the comatose Natalie Portman).
If you loved TPM, you'll go ape over this--if you hated TPM, you'll find this a bit more palatable but with some of the same weaknesses: forced humor (albeit with several genuinely GOOD lines) and some flat pacing courtesy of Ben Burtt.
posted 05-08-2002 11:05 AM PT (US) 
Hasta
Goldmember

Heh, so both of you say it's "good" and not "great"... What I expected.Damn that Knowles... He's the most glaringly take-advantage-of-what-I-see-early critic on the planet... Glad I stopped taking his criticism's seriously more than a year ago.
posted 05-08-2002 11:10 AM PT (US) 
SEBULBA

Goldmember

No offense to Dan or Jeff, but Hasta, what makes you think they're opinion on the film is better than Knowles? Me, I just really never listen to others opinions at all until I see it myself. Then I can either agree or debate. But why not wait and see what YOU think of it. And not just you (Hasta), but anyone who goes to see it and is reading reviews.
posted 05-08-2002 11:55 AM PT (US) 
Mark Olivarez

Goldmember

Ok now I'm somewhat confused. Several reviewers have stated that the final battle is tracked with music from ROTJ, TPM and AOTC. The reason I'm slightly confused is because I read somewhere Lucas was doing some last minute tinkering with the film, so I'm wondering if the early print people are reviewing is the final or is it still a temp with tracked music. Another reason is that I though Rick McCallum had mentioned Williams wrote 125 mins worth of music. I can see maybe rehashing some action music but either Williams just used previously written material or Lucas FUBAR'd his music again.What gives?????
posted 05-08-2002 12:06 PM PT (US) 
dgoldwas

Goldmember

quote:
Originally posted by Mark Olivarez:
Several reviewers have stated that the final battle is tracked with music from ROTJ, TPM and AOTC. The reason I'm slightly confused is because I read somewhere Lucas was doing some last minute tinkering with the film, so I'm wondering if the early print people are reviewing is the final or is it still a temp with tracked music. Another reason is that I though Rick McCallum had mentioned Williams wrote 125 mins worth of music. I can see maybe rehashing some action music but either Williams just used previously written material or Lucas FUBAR'd his music again.What gives?????
Not sure what gives, to be honest... but I didn't hear ROTJ in there.... just AOTC and TPM. This was the final cut of the film. The film has been locked for a few weeks, and THX TAP has been QAing the prints around the clock. What I saw was digitally projected, and I'm sure - nay, I KNOW - that it was the final cut. Trust me on this one. Williams probably DID record 125 minutes of music... but it doesn't mean they USED it all.
Dan
posted 05-08-2002 12:11 PM PT (US) 
Mark Olivarez

Goldmember

Thanks for the info Dan.I wonder how much more pissed Williams will be this time around, if his score is cut and slashed as bad as reviews say it has.
posted 05-08-2002 12:17 PM PT (US) 
TV's Frank

Goldmember

So, now as I understand it, the STAR WARS series will greatly resemble the original Trek TV series in its use of tracked score cues? Wow. I guess Lucas must think, "Hey, there's 10 hours of music already written for my films, I can just give ol' John a rest now!". Maybe for Episode III we can expect the full score to be completely tracked with cues from previous STAR WARS scores? Heck, why stop there, why not just start grabbing from other Williams scores to fill in the silent gaps?- Track any scene of tenderness with either Princess Leia's theme, Han & Leia's theme, Luke & Leia's theme, Across the Stars, or the Love Theme from SUPERMAN (Hey, it's all just strings to Lucas!).
- Track heroic moments with the TIE Fighter attack from ANH, The Forest Battle from ROTJ, and Desert Chase from RAIDERS (Hey, they're all just brassy themes to Lucas!).
- Track all evil moments with either the Imperial March, Main Title from THE FURY, the theme from JAWS, or O Fortuna! from Carmina Burana (Hey, it's... you get the picture).
I just find it extremely distasteful that Lucas feels the need to just simply needle-drop freely for his film's scores. As egregious as the edits were in TPM, at least all the cues were from the score as written for the damn film! Did Lucas really have to pull cues from a previous score to fit the emotional need of the scenes in AOTC? Did not one single moment in the 125 minutes of music Williams composed for AOTC meet his strict requirements?
I'm just really peeved because AOTC is a great score and Lucas simply tossed it out the back door like Friedkin tossed Schifrin's EXORCIST music.
posted 05-08-2002 07:16 PM PT (US) 
Quill
Goldmember

The rampant anti-Lucas sentiment infesting this board is indeed entertaining.If the music from an existing Star Wars score is more befitting for a certain scene then use it. Is is really that much of a travesty?
posted 05-09-2002 08:52 AM PT (US) 
dgoldwas

Goldmember

quote:
Originally posted by Quill:
If the music from an existing Star Wars score is more befitting for a certain scene then use it. Is is really that much of a travesty?Not really - if it works in the film.....
Anyways - this has been done many many times before. ALIEN used Goldsmith's music from FREUD, and DIE HARD used music from MAN ON FIRE and ALIENS.... at least in the case of Episode 2, the music comes from the same film series!
Dan
posted 05-09-2002 09:02 AM PT (US) 
HAL 2000
Goldmember

quote:
Originally posted by JeffBond:
If you loved TPM, you'll go ape over this--if you hated TPM, you'll find this a bit more palatable but with some of the same weaknesses: forced humor (albeit with several genuinely GOOD lines) and some flat pacing courtesy of Ben Burtt.Ben Burtt? I could be wrong but isn't he the sound effects wiz? What does he have to do with the pacing of the movie?
posted 05-09-2002 09:27 AM PT (US) 
John Zimmer

Goldmember

quote:
Originally posted by dgoldwas:
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=1 face=arial>quote:</font><HR size=1>Originally posted by MarkA:
[b]Thanks for the score info but you forgot to mention one thing -- how was the movie?
<HR size=1></BLOCKQUOTE>LOL - I knew I forgot something!!

The movie was GOOD. Not GREAT, but definitely a hell of a lot better than Episode 1. It was pretty solid, and never dull. The action was great, the acting was whatever (Lucas.... grrr....), and the love-story was a little forced.... But overall, this is a good film.
Dan[/B]
Wait wait wait!! You've...SEEN this movie? NO FAIR!!!

Jz
posted 05-09-2002 09:32 AM PT (US) 
dgoldwas

Goldmember

quote:
Originally posted by HAL 2000:
Ben Burtt? I could be wrong but isn't he the sound effects wiz? What does he have to do with the pacing of the movie?well... he edited Episode 1, and he edited Episode 2.... and yes, he's a sound effects wiz.
talk about "keeping your day job"! eeesh....
Dan
posted 05-09-2002 09:39 AM PT (US) 
dgoldwas

Goldmember

quote:
Originally posted by John Zimmer:
Wait wait wait!! You've...SEEN this movie? NO FAIR!!!
Oh, relax John!
It comes one in one week.... you'll live!!Dan
posted 05-09-2002 09:39 AM PT (US) 
John Zimmer

Goldmember

Still......Jz
NP: The Phantom (David Newman)
posted 05-09-2002 11:02 AM PT (US) 
HAL 2000
Goldmember

quote:
Originally posted by dgoldwas:
well... he edited Episode 1, and he edited Episode 2.... and yes, he's a sound effects wiz.talk about "keeping your day job"! eeesh....
Dan
Wow. Did he do that badly editing Ep 2?
posted 05-09-2002 11:28 AM PT (US) 
JeffBond

Goldmember

It just felt sluggish. Something's wrong when you feel relaxed and detached during the first action scene in the movie. I thought the crowd reaction was very similar to the one I saw when I watched TPM (and this was with the ILM crew in San Francisco)--everyone's going nuts during the opening crawl and then they settle down into total silence for an hour or so--there's just dead air in there a lot of the time. But it is more entertaining than TPM.
posted 05-09-2002 12:33 PM PT (US) 
HadrianD

Goldmember

I wonder why Lucas doesn't just hire some REAL editors to cut his movies. Like Christian Wagner or Stuart Baird. Film editing is a craft, dammit. Lucas better start respectin' it.
posted 05-09-2002 12:49 PM PT (US) 
HAL 2000
Goldmember

On top of the dozens of fan reviews that have inundated the net many of the big entertainment magazines are starting to weigh in on the movie. Of those I've read NONE are raves, most are mixed and a few are downright negative. It's like the reviews of TMP all over again with most saying that ATOTC is marginally better and more entertaining but hobbled by many of the same weaknesses that inflicted TMP. I must confess that what I'm hearing has forced me to lower my expectations and that may be a good thing.The most consistent criticisms concern the acting, dialog, plodding pace and too much visual overload.
posted 05-09-2002 01:06 PM PT (US) 
Ed
Goldmember

I'd like to point out that by far the most overwhelmingly POSITIVE reviews came from webmasters who were personally invited by Lucasfilm to view the movie weeks ahead of everyone else (even other reviewers).Now, as the traditional (and more senior) reviewers are permitted to screen the film, the response has become much more restrained, even muted.
Press junkets and special access...they do wonders.
posted 05-09-2002 01:18 PM PT (US) 
UCFKevin

Goldmember

The so called "bad reviews" of AOTC aren't even reviews. They're just basically complaints. The reviewers seem as though they have a huge chip on their shoulder as a result of TPM. They're acting like Lucas owed them something for the disappointment THEY experienced from TOM and since they didn't get exactly what they wanted in AOTC, they're saying it's bad, yet their reasons aren't really enough to warrant a bad review.This was to be expected, though. I'm sure it's going to be a fantastic movie. Who needs critics anyway?
posted 05-09-2002 02:47 PM PT (US) 
SEBULBA

Goldmember

Right on Kevin! Who needs the critics. They mess things up. Too many people actually take to heart what the critics say. "Oh, he said it was horrible, so I won't go see it". What!! YOU may like it. Who the hell is this person telling you wether it's good or not? It's ALL opinion. And EVERY person will differ. I so often like or even love films that critics hate. Or even the other way around. The only thing critics are good for is entertainment themselves. I loved Siskel and Ebert, just because of the bickering. Who cares what they actually thought.[Message edited by SEBULBA on 05-09-2002]
posted 05-09-2002 02:55 PM PT (US) 
Beatty

Goldmember

Who is TOM?
posted 05-09-2002 04:02 PM PT (US) 
Bond1965

Goldmember

quote:
Originally posted by Beatty:
Who is TOM?TOM is a misspelling of TPM (The Phantom Menace).
Or maybe ATOC=TOM (The Other Menace)
James
posted 05-09-2002 04:05 PM PT (US) 
SPQR

Goldmember

"Or maybe ATOC=TOM (The Other Menace)"Oh, you mean George Lucas...
posted 05-09-2002 05:20 PM PT (US) 
HAL 2000
Goldmember

Normally I take evrything critics say with a big grain of salt. HOWEVER, it tuned out that most of the dissenting reviews I read about TPM were dead on, unfortunately. I hope they'er wrong about AOTC but we've seen Obi Wan Lucas' shortcomings and it is possible that they may be evident in this movie. I just don't want to have my expectations too high based on a handful of fansite reviews only to be let down by the real thing. If I went solely by Ain't it Cool and others then that would probably happen... and who needs that?
posted 05-09-2002 06:22 PM PT (US) 
SPQR

Goldmember

quote:
The most consistent criticisms concern the acting, dialog, plodding pace and too much visual overload....essentially everything that seperates a good film from a bad film. Yet, the fanboys rejoice. Gotta wonder then what the attraction is.
posted 05-09-2002 07:07 PM PT (US) 
dgoldwas

Goldmember

quote:
Originally posted by SPQR:
Gotta wonder then what the attraction is.Well.... it's a visually cool film. It's fun.
As far as how it ranks as film (and i use the word regarding "movies", not the whole digital/celluloid issue) holds up... well... it's just an alright film. The pacing is fine (I was never bored), but the editing (see above) isn't polished. The actors seem to muddle through their hammed lines of dialogue with little enthusiasm, and the term "high school drama" came to mind a few times.... And that's the thing - the dialogue isn't really anything spectacular.
Ultimately, this is a visual popcorn film - it's a feast for the eyes and the ears - and if you're gonna be all critical about it from a film theory perspective, you're gonna find it to be flawed.
Dan
posted 05-09-2002 07:46 PM PT (US) 
SPQR

Goldmember

quote:
Well.... it's a visually cool film. It's fun.So, that's it? Nothing else to recommend it but alot of spiffy CGI? Geez, pixels seem to be more entertaining than people now in days...
[Message edited by SPQR on 05-09-2002]
posted 05-09-2002 08:04 PM PT (US) 
dgoldwas

Goldmember

quote:
Originally posted by SPQR:
So, that's it? Nothing else to recommend it but alot of spiffy CGI? Geez, pixels seem to be more entertaining than people now in days...Well, there's more to it than just spiffy CGI.... but if you're looking for seriously good acting and quality dialogue, look elsewhere.
Dan
posted 05-09-2002 08:26 PM PT (US) 
Bozman

Goldmember

I'd have a problem even saying Episode II was "good." The pacing, while better than Phantom Premise, was still erratic. And, the performances were almost universally flat (Oz, Lee and Jackson being the exceptions). Lucas has lost all interest in storytelling and directing, and instead is obsessed with the quantity of digital things he can cram in a frame. The effects were stunning at times, but didn't feel like "special" effects. The action scenes, while better paced than Phantom, were still boring because I did not care about any of the characters. What made the original films fun was 1) exciting action sequences, and 2) characters I had some emotional investment in.I agree with whoever said the music was hacked together in this one as well. The entire score was mixed quite low--so low at points I found myself hoping this was not the final mix (alas, it is).
On the good side, it's better than Phantom, but not by much. Jar Jar is almost a non-character in this one, but there are a host of other digital toys that clutter the screen and make the human actors seem even more out of place.
Will it make a ton of money? Sure. It's a fun summer popcorn movie.
Bozman
NP: Moby - 18
[Message edited by Bozman on 05-09-2002]
posted 05-09-2002 08:27 PM PT (US) 
James

Goldmember

You people talk about "critics" as if they were one body with a giant head and a piercing gavel passing judgement on whether of not every person in the world should see this film or that.You can't just go around to a bunch of critics for the first time on one film and expect to be truly educated in any way. Why would you? Critics are there to give you their educated (yes, educated) opinions as to the quality of the film as they see it.
You can't throw them all into a barrel and use them all at once. You have to find (a) critic(s) who's opinions are comparable to your own--not necessarily always the same--but comparable. Only after you've familiarized yourself with a critic can you begin to use any of the information they provide.
Sure, some of them are unpredictable (Roeper) and some of them seem to think movies are only made to suit their individual reviews (Roeper), but there are some very talented, very effective critics out there with very valid things to say. You just have to know how to listen.
Sorry for the departure of subject. I am looking forward to Episode 2. While none of the critics I keep a close eye on have weighed in yet, I think I've learned enough about Dan's outlook on things to be optimistic--while cautiously not too excited--that I will enjoy the film not only for the time I'm in the theater, but also, hopefully, when I watch it years later. It sounds like a good movie.
Kirk
posted 05-09-2002 08:45 PM PT (US) 
JJH

Goldmember

no one should ever make the mistake of confusing Star Wars with Shakesspeare.They've all had simplistic dialogue.
NP -- Iris, Hornerposted 05-10-2002 03:02 AM PT (US) 
HAL 2000
Goldmember

quote:
Originally posted by JJH:
no one should ever make the mistake of confusing [b]Star Wars with Shakesspeare.They've all had simplistic dialogue.
NP -- Iris, Horner[/B]
Absolutely. But they've also all been extremely entertaining except for TPM. I hope better for AOTC.posted 05-10-2002 06:17 AM PT (US) 
Quill
Goldmember

I've read pretty much every review out there...they are all over the map. So let's see...bad acting...Whines Luke...:""Ahh....but I wanted my power converters."
Plot...the original was incredibly simplistic...essentially a western in space. After reading the script for AOTC I found it to have twice the plot. Apparently though it does suffer from pacing issues...probably tied to the editing room.
Too much CGI...kinda like there was too much model work in the originals. Lucas has always tried to push the envelope--problem now is too many people are jaded against FX. Don't blame Lucas--he is doing what he has always done. Little models for more lifelike computer images...cute rubber costumes for more lifelike computer generated characters. Complaining about that seems a little silly.
I can understand how many people have vaulted Star Wars too such a high pedestal they will train themselves to allow nothing to encroach upon the originals. They are sacred. As I've said before, if you could open your minds a bit, leave your preconceived notions at home, and watch the movie for what is...simple escapist fair...you might actually enjoy that. If not--well--we'll chat in week when the predictable negativity bomb explodes yet again.
posted 05-10-2002 07:34 AM PT (US) 
Shawn

Minimember

According to the first post, it notes that during the final climax of the film, cues from episode I are used. Specifically the Droid Invasion and the Droid Battle. Some of you have been complaining that Lucas re-uses music instead of using the new score that was done for episode II for many of the scenes in the movie. Again, according to the first post, it seems that Lucas does use the new score for most of the movie, just not the climax, in which he uses the two droid cues from ep 1.I, for one, do not have a problem with this, since the climax involves the droids and the two Neimoidians from ep. 1. Those 2 cues should be used for that scene, just as Lucas re-uses themes when certain characters appear on screen(Leia, Luke, Yoda, etc.).
posted 05-10-2002 08:02 AM PT (US) Old Infopop Software by UBB
