The MovieMusic Store shopping cart   |  sign in
    SEARCH  
  • Home
  • Browse Store
    • New Soundtrack CDs
    • Top Sellers
    • Low Price New CDs
    • Used CDs
    • Soundtrack Compilations
    • Score Composers
    • Soundtrack Labels
    • Soundtracks by Year
    • ... detailed search page
  • Store Info
    • Happy Customers!
    • $1 Shipping
    • Accepted Payment Methods
    • Safe Shopping Guarantee
    • Shipping Rates & Policies
    • Our Privacy Policy
    • About Us
  • Help Center
    • My Account
    • How to Order
    • Search Tips
    • Return/Refund Policy
    • Cancelling Your Order
    • Contact the Store
  • The Lobby
  •   Message Boards
      Movie Soundtracks
      The Power of Music..."The Time Machine"

    Archive of old forum. No more postings.

    Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.

    Author
    Topic:   The Power of Music..."The Time Machine"

     Gae
     Click Here to Email Gae
     Oscar® Winner
     

    I was listening to and enjoying the score to "The Time Machine" (Russell Garcia) today and as I was doing so, an interesting thought came into my mind...(Hasn't the price of bacon gone up!!"... Just kidding!! )
    No, what I was thinking was this. The music still has the ability to affect me, even long after I had discarded the actual movie as a juvenile adventure that I used to love as a child but had grown out of. I recently caught the picture on TCM and realised this. Dont get me wrong. I still enjoy it for nostalgic reasons and there are a few enjoyable aspects to the movie (Yvette Mimieux being one) I've always loved the scene where we first see the "Time Machine"...Garcia's music is stunning here. Also, I still find the Morlock's one of the most wierdest of creatures to hit the screen (although I do tend to look at them more as overweight actors, painted green and wearing masks and a blonde wig these days ) ..... I was terrified of them when I was young though.
    Back to the music then. I can still listen to the score away from the film and feel all those feelings that a viewing of the film doesn't seem to evoke anymore. The "Machine" music, mentioned above, still conjures up feelings of awe, majesty, and the mysteriousness of time travelling and what lies ahead. The "Love Theme" still has the ability to move me (even at a cynical 36 years old) and remind me of the crush I had for the beautiful Yvette Mimeux (I still do, thats why!!) The music of "fear" as Rod Taylor walks around having a panic attack still has the power to evoke "fear" in me and some of the "Dome" music is very atmospheric and really builds up an image of a new and strange environment. Also, the "Morlock" fight music is still exciting and scary. Incidentally, I have read H.G. Well's novella "The Time Machine" which is great and the music can also capture my memories of the book. Oddly though, the book, in my mind, still has Rod Taylor as the time traveller, such is the power of association!!
    Why does music have this power to still move us this way? Here are my ideas.
    Because music is purely aural it allows our inner imagination to go to work and taps into our primal fears and dreams deep in the recesses of our minds, bringing out latent memories and feelings that are still there waiting to be tapped. Visually, we are so sophisticated these days, that we become very critical of certain imagery...e.g. look how daft those "Morlocks" look now compared to some of the latest effects..that kind of thing, and it spoils the "suspension of disbelief". We are much less critical as children (or at least I was when I was a child!!). The music though works on a different level. As well as working on an intellectual level, it has the power to effect us on a primal "gut" level and evoke the emotion that we associate with a particular piece of music...the same when a certain smell or perfume suddenly dramatically hits us with a memory bite of some incident or long lost girlfriend.
    Anyway, what do you all think about this? Firstly, the power of music and also the music to the "Time Machine" or do you have other music which has the same nostalgic power over you? We've probably discussed this before, but its worth visiting again surely!! Gae NP The Time Machine"

    [Message edited by Gae on 12-04-2001]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-04-2001 05:24 AM PT (US)     

     Timmer
     Click Here to Email Timmer
     Oscar® Winner
     

    We are cut from the same cloth you and I Gae, what you wrote is me exactly!

    For all it's flaws, I still like to watch Time Machine every now and then (i.e. every few years), it's a good Christmas film that still leaves me with a warm nostalgic glow, 'Filbys Theme' never fails to bring a tear to the eye, particularly with the knowledge of what becomes of him, and the theme?...I could hum that as a young kid long before I had the soundtrack and long before I was even into film scores, which shows I must have been nurturing a love for this stuff we all like here from a very young age!

    I also remember seeing THUNDERBALL with a large group of friends from junior school during summer holidays (remember those 6 week holidays ), and that music 'THAT MUSIC' during the climatic fight on the Disco Volante stuck in my head forever, My friends and I would play at being secret agents and THAT music, NOT the Bond theme would revolve on continual head loop in me. Upon discovering (and finally having enough money) a few years later, around 1974, soundtrack albums, I was CRUSHED to find that THAT version of the 007 theme wasn't on the LP...did I really have to wait nearly two whole decades for this situation to be finally rectified with the release of the 30th Anniversary Collectors Edition?!

    Enough of my ranting, Kids these days don't know how good they've got it

    NP : Walking With Beasts - Benjamin Bartlett (not as good as 'Dinosaurs' but still a worthwhile purchase )

    [Message edited by Timmer on 12-04-2001]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-04-2001 05:40 PM PT (US)     

     Graham Watt
     Click Here to Email Graham Watt
     Oscar® Winner
     

    Well, I think you've just answered your own question, Gae! And yes, like you and Timmer, The Time Machine music still gets me every time. Same with 50s Leith Stevens (Destination Moon, When Worlds Collide, War Of The Worlds...), all pretty cheesy films now, but with timeless scores. Hmmm...I've just thought, are they really "timeless", or does nostalgia just travel better when it's aural...?

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-05-2001 03:55 PM PT (US)     

     Gae
     Click Here to Email Gae
     Oscar® Winner
     

    You know, you two guys could almost be my long lost brothers....Older ones of course!!

    Gae NP The Time Machine (Russell Garcia)(The "timeless" score in my opinion!!)

    [Message edited by Gae on 12-05-2001]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-05-2001 04:41 PM PT (US)     

     Howard L
     Oscar® Winner
     

    I saw TM as a youngster sometime in the mid-60s and without a doubt the Garcia score has become a lifetime film music memory. Its impact most surely contributed to a fledgling film music awareness that in turn would lead to serious film music appreciation way down the road. Unbeknownst to me then, of course! It is a marvelous score for every instance cited. The Love Theme has always been a keeper, the simple whirl of time travel engaged a pleasant prelude to the eclectic underscoring of time travel in progress; both a musical reminder of a bygone era in cinematic terms...and I suppose real life terms as well.

    [Message edited by Howard L on 12-07-2001]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-07-2001 09:28 AM PT (US)     

     Swashbuckler
     Click Here to Email Swashbuckler
     Oscar® Winner
     

    I always found this film and score to be examples of how things have soured in general in the creation of cinema...

    The film, for all its flaws, definitely takes its time at the begining to go through not only the basis for the creation of the time machine and also touches on the moral implications of it. While much of this comes from the book, the way the film sets up the character of Filby (ostensibly the narrator of the book, but with elements that seem to come from elsewhere) is something that is rarely done today with such relative ease.

    Similarly, "Filby's Theme" is one of the most warm pieces of film scoring ever... taking the time to illustrate a character who, while highly moral and central to the aesthetic of the film, is nevertheless ancillary to the main body of the film.

    I also love the opening fanfares...

    Overall, I have to say that, while the score for The Time Machine has not become obsolete the way that the picture's effects have, it is representative of an era in which an adventure film score consisted of more than a lot of orchestral acrobatics and a rock anthem main theme.

    NP - John Barry: The Specialist which I haven't listened to for a while, but is really good...

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-08-2001 08:33 PM PT (US)     

     Howard L
     Oscar® Winner
     

    It's always nice to bring up the Filby character as played by Alan Young and the music: a gentle theme for a gentle man. One thing has always held a fascination for me from that first viewing as a kid, namely, the little monument outside the Wells homestead erected by Filby "in memory of his dear friend George." In the more-immediate "future" young Filby remarked to the stranger that "Father always hoped he would return." The whole thing didn't seem to make sense at that moment, but thinking back on this scene at the conclusion of the picture...wow.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-14-2001 04:16 PM PT (US)     

     Chris Kinsinger
     Click Here to Email Chris Kinsinger
     Oscar® Winner
     

    George Pal's The Time Machine may "look cheesy" to we 2001 CGI babies, but the film has a quality that so very few movies ever achieve...HEART.
    The movie has, and always will have, a strong heart. That is why we will never forget it.
    That heart is realized in the contribution of the writers, the director, the actors, the musical composer, and even the make-up and visual effects team. They ALL contributed.
    Yeah...visual effects have come so far since then...SO WHAT?
    The Time Machine will likely never be equalled, because of its heart.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-14-2001 08:19 PM PT (US)     

     Graham Watt
     Click Here to Email Graham Watt
     Oscar® Winner
     

    I agree, Chris. State-of-the-art FX go for nothing when the heart is absent. That's why I'll always prefer Ray Harryhausen over computer generated images. That man put so much love into every frame of film, into literally every frame of film he worked on.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-15-2001 02:15 PM PT (US)     

     Graham Watt
     Click Here to Email Graham Watt
     Oscar® Winner
     

    Oh, and I know that Ray Harryhausen had nothing to do with The Time Machine, but you get my point!

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-15-2001 02:16 PM PT (US)     

     Chris Kinsinger
     Click Here to Email Chris Kinsinger
     Oscar® Winner
     

    How right you IS, Graham!
    There's certainly a lot to be said about today's CGI effects, but "heart" isn't among the adjectives used to describe it.
    There's something about the human touch; the hand moving the puppet, that somehow brings an added dimension of LIFE to the work.
    That's what's missing in CGI, as I see it.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-15-2001 05:13 PM PT (US)     

     MWRuger
     Click Here to Email MWRuger
     Oscar® Winner
     

    I don’t think CGI is the problem. Time Machine works because of the story, not the effects. The spirit of exploration plus the Traveler’s innate sense of goodness are what make the story tick. The music adds emotional depth that is the final piece of the film. It works because we care about what happens to the Traveler and Weena. The Time Machine is great because it aspires to greatness and is willing to show us characters worth knowing.

    The problem with the “CGI” generation is lack of decent scripts that are willing to tell a story about human beings and give us characters we care about. I place a good hunk of the blame on scripts by committee and a good sized piece of it on blockbuster mentality that is too afraid to move away from the most safely trodden path.

    Take a look at John McClean, or Dirty Harry or Arnold or any of dozen other characters from Special Efx pics. The one thing they all have in common is that they don’t really feel of care about anything. They give us nothing to hang our emotional hats on and so we have a hard time losing ourselves in the film. They concentrate too much on the effects in the picture than the effect on the audience.

    You’re right about the lack of heart, but it isn’t in the effects, its in the scripts. (Or rather, it isn’t in the scripts)

    CGI is no more killing film than adding sound did in the 20’s or Color in 30’s or ‘scope pictures in the 50’s.

    These movies are soulless because of the scripts, not the effects. No Passion.


    [Message edited by MWRuger on 12-16-2001]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-15-2001 09:53 PM PT (US)     

     Timmer
     Click Here to Email Timmer
     Oscar® Winner
     

    Dirty Harry...CGI...????

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-16-2001 05:05 AM PT (US)     

     Gae
     Click Here to Email Gae
     Oscar® Winner
     

    Yeh Timmer, didn't you know, Andrew Robinson was actually computer generated!!
    Come on now...no human being could really act that psychotically could they?

    MWRuger said
    "The problem with the “CGI” generation is lack of decent scripts that are willing to tell a story about human beings and give us characters we care about. I place a good hunk of the blame on scripts by committee and a good sized piece of it on blockbuster mentality that is too afraid to move away from the most safely trodden path".

    I agree wholeheartedly with you. Thats why these days I tend to tune into TCM rather than rent a new movie cos I always come away dissatisfied after watching one.
    Its really frustrating because you feel that with the technology available someone should be coming up with the greatest fantasy movie ever which uses CGI along with a great script and real human characters (Maybe LOTR will be the one). Whats lacking is that we just dont care for the characters much because they are unsympathetic characters who look after number one (reflecting a modern attitude in people maybe)...a kind of "me against the world" mentality. I watched "Tomb Raider" the other day and I was both frustrated and pleased with it simultaneously.

    Frustrated because the characters are obviously from a computer game and they were very one-dimensional

    Frustrated because once again we are subjected to the most mindless, subliminal, gravity-defying, stupefying and mind numbing combat scenes that go on and on and on ad nauseum

    Frustrated because when we did finally reach an interesting point in the movie (i.e. the Stone Monkey episode in the temple) it was over too soon

    Frustrated cos Graeme Revelle has once again undermined all the hard work of film composers who brought the beauty of orchestral scores back to movies with musical motifs for characters and emotive cues and instead gives us noisy, techno computer game music. Sorry guys but I dont like his music. Give me Williams, Goldsmith or Poledouris any day.

    Frustrated because the movie was once again, like Lake Placid, Jurassic Park III and other recent films woefully short as if they'd run out of ideas or just wanted to make a fast buck.

    Pleased because I though Angelina Jolie did a pretty good job and she had some positive screen presence.(Didn't know she was John Voight's daughter either, that was a surprise )

    Pleased because the scene in the "Temple of Lights?" had some great creatures (The Stone Monkeys, Griffin and the six-armed kali (Rahmahan?) which seemed like a tribute to "Harryhausen") but once again this scene was just over too soon and if extended would have added great weight to the films impact)

    Pleased with some of the sets e.g The Victorian planets mechanism at the end which was reminiscent of those out of both "The Time Machine" and "Riven"

    Overall I would give Tomb Raider a **1/2 out of *****

    Come on Hollywood! Isn't it about time you made a fantasy movie that can rival and pay homage to the likes of "Jason and the Argonauts" which is nearly 40 years old.

    Gae NP Classic FM


    [Message edited by Gae on 12-16-2001]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-16-2001 05:46 AM PT (US)     

     MWRuger
     Click Here to Email MWRuger
     Oscar® Winner
     

    Yeah I can see where it would seem that I was saying Dirty Harry was a special effects film. What I was trying to say was that these kinds of Action Hero pictures fall, in my mind at least, into the same category as EFX films. All show, no go!

    Maybe I should take Dirty Harry out and slide in Van Damme, Sylvester Stallone, Arnold Schwarnegger, Kurt Russell actioneers.

    I must admit I enjoyed Dirty Harry and Magnum Force, especially the Lalo Schifrin Score for Dirty Harry. Still didn't make me care about the charcters though, except for the victims.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-16-2001 10:21 AM PT (US)     

     Graham Watt
     Click Here to Email Graham Watt
     Oscar® Winner
     

    That's right, MW, slip Dirty Harry out of that list, he has no place here! But before we let him go, let me just say that I thought Don Siegel's approach to the character was exactly right. I haven't seen the film in ages, but I get the feeling that maybe Harry himself was a victim of a brutally heartless world. Or maybe I'm just talking rubbish.

    You're right though about the problem of the lack of heart in the scripts behind CGI. However, I still think that, even when the heart's there, it can be accentuated by lovingly produced stop-motion effects. And if the heart is lacking, very often those fancifully realized creatures are the real soul of the movie.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-16-2001 01:48 PM PT (US)     

     Timmer
     Click Here to Email Timmer
     Oscar® Winner
     

    Like Graham I haven't seen Dirty Harry for a long time, however I do remember one heart rending and very poignant scene where a young girls body is pulled from the ground, a gentle theme from Schifrin with the Golden Gate bridge in the background...unless I'm wrong this scene followed Eastwood's (Callahan's) futile attempt at saving the kidnapped girls life, running from phone booth to phone booth as per Scorpio's instructions?!

    How come this score has never had a proper release?

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-16-2001 06:18 PM PT (US)     

     MWRuger
     Click Here to Email MWRuger
     Oscar® Winner
     

    The problem with stop motion is three fold.

    First, you have to do all the creature effects that way. Mixing it with CGI would make it look very out of place and reduce the suspension of disbelief to nothing.

    Second, horrendously expensive and time consuming, way more than CGI. When there was no choice you just bit the bullet and paid.

    Third, there are limits to the technology. No matter how good stop motion is it will never blend seamlessly like the CGI did in Jurassic Park.

    In a way, Stop motion is like B&W films. It is a valid way to do a movie, but it is more the province of the auter than the studio.

    Martin Scorcese could get away with Raging Bull and Tim Burton could get away with Nightmare before Christmas, but they are the exception that proves the rule.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 12-16-2001 07:27 PM PT (US)     
     

    Old Infopop Software by UBB

    © 1998-2011, The MovieMusic Company