The MovieMusic Store shopping cart   |  sign in
    SEARCH  
  • Home
  • Browse Store
    • New Soundtrack CDs
    • Top Sellers
    • Low Price New CDs
    • Used CDs
    • Soundtrack Compilations
    • Score Composers
    • Soundtrack Labels
    • Soundtracks by Year
    • ... detailed search page
  • Store Info
    • Happy Customers!
    • $1 Shipping
    • Accepted Payment Methods
    • Safe Shopping Guarantee
    • Shipping Rates & Policies
    • Our Privacy Policy
    • About Us
  • Help Center
    • My Account
    • How to Order
    • Search Tips
    • Return/Refund Policy
    • Cancelling Your Order
    • Contact the Store
  • The Lobby
  •   Message Boards
      Movie Soundtracks
      Pearl Harbor's Yin-Yang

    Archive of old forum. No more postings.

    Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.

    Author
    Topic:   Pearl Harbor's Yin-Yang

     PeterK
     Click Here to Email PeterK
     FishChip
     

    Final takes:

    Wallace's Pearl Harbor has one basic problem: don't ever use the events of Pearl Harbor as a backdrop for anything, especially if you have a romance in mind. The script is to take the blame for 90% of this film's failure.

    This film couldn't decide which film it wanted to be, however, audiences definitely knew which film they wanted: forget the triangle love affair, let's see a good war film.

    People cheered as our two leading pilots played chicken while dogfighting with the Japanese. Sigh. What people wanted to see most was the worst folly of the entire film - there was no dogfighting during the attack on Pearl Harbor. Our butts were kicked into the Pacific, plain and simple.

    As for Zimmer (et al)'s score, it was terrific. A beautiful main theme used frequently but never overstaying its welcome. We've been beaten over the head with far more irritating main themes in previous Bruckheimer flicks. Plus, and as mentioned, there are many worse follies in the film to pick on before getting to the score.

    The intense, percussive-driven theme for the Japanese Imperials couldn't have been more effective. Sensitive to the possibility that Japanese racism might once again rise out of a film like this, the score has a very important responsibility in defining the tone placed on the Japanese. Zimmer's very bold, ominous percussion is certainly powerful and dark, but not evil. Nicely executed.

    As for recommending the film, it's hard to say. I am glad I saw it, but could have done without the romance all together. Bay's direction is average at best (nothing honorable); the look of the film is extraordinary (thumbs up on Schwartzman's cinematography) but entirely used without solid effect; the script is definitely the weakest link here.

    But what matters here? The score. Thumbs up. Even if you don't see the flick, you can be safe buying the soundtrack.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-25-2001 03:32 PM PT (US)     

     Justin
     Click Here to Email Justin
     Oscar® Winner
     

    Now THAT I can definitely AGREE with. Well put Peter.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-25-2001 03:49 PM PT (US)     

     Lancelot
     Click Here to Email Lancelot
     Oscar® Winner
     

    (well...as ancient mythology has taught us, you can't really have a story about "brothers"--figurative--without having those brothers conflict over something, and then having only one of them walk away....it's Cain/Abel, Romulus/Remus.)

    but with a few exceptions, I agree. (I think Bay probably better than most folks give credit for....but that's just me.)

    there is a "different" kind of romance going on in that film, though...a romance with flying, that bookends the film, and runs throughout. that, in and of itself, is a pretty romantic/poetic subject, particularly in the pre-jet engine era. the way that flying is "handled", as some kind of mysterious rite, that has an beauty, power, and awe of itself...

    when you look at wallace's repetoire so far: "braveheart", "man in the iron mask", and now, "pearl harbor", i think he's been pretty consistent in his themes of patriotism, valor, and suppressed romanticism....this does pretty well, by him.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-25-2001 04:14 PM PT (US)     

     Camillu
     Click Here to Email Camillu
     Oscar® Winner
     

    Is the theme for the Japanese found on the album, and if yes, where?

    Merci.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-25-2001 04:17 PM PT (US)     

     PeterK
     Click Here to Email PeterK
     FishChip
     

    This is the one you want: Attack

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-25-2001 04:25 PM PT (US)     

     Quill
     Oscar® Winner
     

    Camillu...without having seen the film yet...I believe Peter is referring the percussion that opens track 6...The Attack.

    Thanks for the well-balanced thoughts Peter...its refreshing to have a few voices or reason that can be heard above bickering...of which (unfortunately) I was part of.

    It's just a movie after all...

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-25-2001 04:25 PM PT (US)     

     Probable
     Click Here to Email Probable
     Oscar® Winner
     

    While I appreciate the spirit of your comments, Peter, I'm afraid I have to disagree with you as to the quality of the music. I don't see the fact that there are worse things about the movie than the score as a reason to buy it. The score for Witness, for example, was arguably the best thing about that movie. I still would not buy that score.

    Nor do I think that the fact that there've been worse scores to Bruckheimer films is really a selling point. Then again, you stated that the theme never overstays its welcome, whereas I feel that it was overdone to the point that it now aggravates me. Whatever beauty I thought it had at first is now lost on me.

    Quite apart from whatever flaws or strengths the movie has, I found this score to be disappointing at best, and more often irritating or downright off-putting. I would not recommend this score to any save diehard Zimmer/MV fans, and then hesitatingly.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-25-2001 09:08 PM PT (US)     

     PeterK
     Click Here to Email PeterK
     FishChip
     

    Prob, thanks for your response. I am a bit surprised though, as I never intended my comments to be a spot "checklist" of reasons why one should buy the score. All of my comments, save the last, were reactions to the music in the movie, and hardly intended as selling points (I see where you may be coming from though, after all I am a store owner who theorectically wants to sell as many soundtracks as possible!). I only mentioned one "can be safe buying the soundtrack" without having seen the film only because there have been an inordinate number of people comment that they'd like to see the film first before buying the soundtrack. I feel it's not a pre-requisite for fans of Zimmer et al to see the movie first to appreciate the score away from the film.

    To move on, if I may, I'd like to discuss your final comment a bit more. If the current score is disappointing at best, what kind of music would you have preferred?

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-25-2001 09:33 PM PT (US)     

     Kevin
     Oscar® Winner
     

    I think I'll buy the DVD's of Tora Tora Tora and In Harm's Way instead of wasting my money on this film.

    And maybe watch From Here To Eternity again.

    Kevin

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-25-2001 09:50 PM PT (US)     

     GrizzlyMV
     Click Here to Email GrizzlyMV
     Oscar® Nominee
     

    OK..I just saw the movie. I liked what Bay did in the past, however, I was unsure about that one. I give to the movie a 6/10. Not a bad movie, but far from a classic. As for the score by Zimmer, even if I'm a big fan of Media Venture, I would give it a 4/10. Beside the love theme (which we can hear all over the movie) and the Japanese theme, there was nothing much interresting. It sound uninspired by moments, and we hear the love theme too many times! It's a good theme, but too much is like not enough! It's like if Zimmer had only 2 weeks to score a 3 hours movie...

    I've bought the CD on thusday. I was not really impressed by the score (don't say anything Andre. We all know what you think about Zimmer, so for once, please, don't transform this thread as a bashing thread. It's getting annoying!). So, I decided to wait to hear it in the movie to see if it would sound better. Yes it does. But it still miss something.

    The Japanese theme is probably the best part of the score to me. And it's not even on the CD (except a few seconds on the beginning of track 6). Anyway, it's still a good movie, but a good "popcorn" movie. People may not like it, but hey, it's a Bruckeimer production, and directed by Michael Bay. Who was seriously thinking it would be a serious film like Saving Private Ryan? However, a fiction war story would have been a better background for that kind of movie. That's my point of view. :-)

    And please, everybody who don't like Bruckeimer, Bay, MV and cie, keep your mouth quiet. If you want to share your opinion, that's great, but if you just want to bash, please go elsewhere. There's so many bashing thread on that board, so we don't need another one. ;-) It's getting annoying at the end. ;-) Thanks for your collaboration guys.

    Best Regards,

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-25-2001 09:53 PM PT (US)     

     Dan Brecher
     Click Here to Email Dan Brecher
     Oscar® Winner
     

    quote:
    But what matters here? The score. Thumbs up. Even if you don't see the flick, you can be safe buying the soundtrack.

    This seems like a worthy thread I'd feel happy posting my thoughts in. Right now I'm giving thumbs down to the score and waiting for the movie to open in the UK on Thursday. I like about one or two cues, or simply bits of other cues. The images I had in my mind whilst on track 2 (which to me sounded like a theme to a soap opera) nearly made me puke, maybe I should not have been looking at those lame character images done up for the CD insert.

    I'm really surpriseed by what I just said, I'm not one to bash Zimmer, I like his stuff, don't love it, and am still waiting for him to top Thin Red Line. I guess what I would have wanted for this was removal of the piano stuff, more strings, more thematic and moving themes.

    I'll see how it plays within the movie next week I guess.

    Dan (UK)

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-26-2001 01:28 AM PT (US)     

     Dan Brecher
     Click Here to Email Dan Brecher
     Oscar® Winner
     

    I'm letting myself listen more and more, I still don't like the Tennessee cue, it doesn;t need the soap opera theme at the '1:00' mark into the track, it really does make me cringe, I'd have like it left at strings.

    'Brothers' starts nice, despite again making me think of 'Watermark' by Enya, again though it continues to use Piano from the '1:15' mark where I really wish it hadn't. I just keep seeing trashy daytime medial soap opera!

    '...and then I kisse him' I like pretty much all round, nice balance to it. 'I will come back' I am pretty much ok with, in fact it's fait to say I like the latter half of the album more.

    'Attack' then, one of the biggies I guess, and I like it from the '2:00' point onward. All before that I felt belonged in Gladiator or something. 'December 7th' I like, but then comes 'War' which for me starts promising, then gets a bit too bombastic "remember now, this is a Michael Bay movie!" for me. Not a bad cue mind you, but something more graceful like the battle music heard in Thin Red Line would have been nicer.

    'Heart of a Volunteer' I don't mind, in fact it sort of represents the tone I wish the whole score had been.

    **1/2 rating out of **** for me.

    Dan (again)



    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-26-2001 08:42 AM PT (US)     

     Hasta
     Oscar® Winner
     

    Am I missing something? I'm an avid fan of Hans Zimmer PeterK, but I disagree with you completely. In fact, I'd give the score as heard in film a */*****... It was simply pathetic. Now I'm not sure if Zimmer is to blame, or maybe Bruckheimer, or Bay... But it was terrible. It was the most melodramatic POS I've heard in a while, and it was so phony that people in the theatre actually laughed when it started yet again. Every 5 minutes we get a cheesy 5 minute love scene with the damn main theme, me and many others cringed. The action music I enjoyed, but most of it was typical MV and therefore destracted some of the scenes. I couldn't imagine just watching what Jerry Goldsmith would have done with the project. Every piece of scoring was overblown. As for the Japanese percussive-driven theme, I enjoy it immensely on CD but again it sounded so similar to something out of
    the typical MV sound that it was just out of place. Wallace's script was downright terrible, but Bay's direction outside of the bombing (which was good, however far from spectacular) was EXTREMELY poor. God I was looking forward to this movie too long for it to be "Armageddon 2"... Guess that's what I get for having trust in Bay, I know consider him a genuine hack that has no ability to tell a story whatsoever. Am I glad I saw it? No. Would I pay to see it again? No. I even saw it at Seattle's best theatre (cinorama), with the best seats in the house. The score album, however, is enjoyable and might be worth purchasing if you are a fan of Zimmer.

    NP: Free Willy (Poledouris) ****/*****

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-26-2001 12:43 PM PT (US)     

     PeterK
     Click Here to Email PeterK
     FishChip
     

    Perhaps you guys are right. Chances are I would have enjoyed 25 different love themes for the 25 different romance scenes in the movie.

    I'll ask again, what would any of you have preferred other than what was delivered?

    Hasta, completely disagree? In the end, we both recommended the soundtrack album.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-26-2001 01:56 PM PT (US)     

     Dan Brecher
     Click Here to Email Dan Brecher
     Oscar® Winner
     

    Peter,

    As I stated above, I find the piano stuff to do more harm then good, most of the time wishing it were just left as the backing strings.

    Did I want a Thin Red Line 2? No, a score like TRLs would never suit a Michael Bay movie. Like I said before though, I think track 9, most definately my fave cue on the CD, is really the tone (a rather tragic one) I wish the enitre score had taken in light of the film's subject matter. This cue to me is patriotic whilst at the same time being rather moving. I like it a lot.

    Dan (UK)

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-26-2001 02:07 PM PT (US)     

     Hasta
     Oscar® Winner
     

    PeterK, the slow motion scenes were terrible all in themselves, but Zimmer's main theme constantly playing at every one made them unbearably sappy and phony, like everything was forced. First off I would prefer Bay to stop using that slow motion, but secondly I would, in all honesty, still have prefered many of the slow motion scenes to contain no music at all, or at least something that wasn't so in your face, "they're in love!".

    NP: Judge Dredd (Silvestri) ***/*****


    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-26-2001 02:53 PM PT (US)     

     Shaun Rutherford
     Click Here to Email Shaun Rutherford
     Oscar® Winner
     

    Pearl Harbor main theme = "Paris and Bond" from Tomorrow Never Dies.

    What do you think, Dan?

    Shaun

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-26-2001 03:53 PM PT (US)     

     Hasta
     Oscar® Winner
     

    Just pulled out Enemy at the Gates again. Funny, I remember when hearing Horner's score and seeing the film, I was disappointed and just kept thinking "well Pearl Harbor will make up for this"... Funny how Horner's score and the film were much better than that of Pearl Harbor.

    NP: Enemy at the Gates (Horner) ***/*****

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-26-2001 04:18 PM PT (US)     

     Lancelot
     Click Here to Email Lancelot
     Oscar® Winner
     

    Fourth Feature films:

    Steven Spielberg - "1941"
    The Coen Bros - "Miller's Crossing"
    Joe Johnston - "Jumanji"
    Rob Reiner - "The Princess Bride"
    Ridley Scott - "Legend"
    Robert Zemekis - "Back to the Future"
    Richard Donner - "The Toy"
    James Cameron - "The Abyss"
    Tony Scott - "Revenge"
    Kevin Smith - "Dogma"
    George Lucas - "The Phantom Menace"


    For a director that's only on his 4th movie, you guys sure have a lot of ideas about what does or doesn't belong in a "Michael Bay movie"....I'm just saying this for perspective...some of these other guys went on to direct "Fargo", "Titanic", "Forrest Gump", "Gladiator", "Schindler's List".....

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-26-2001 04:33 PM PT (US)     

     Dan Brecher
     Click Here to Email Dan Brecher
     Oscar® Winner
     

    quote:
    Pearl Harbor main theme = "Paris and Bond" from Tomorrow Never Dies.

    Kinda. That and Enya's 'Watermark' anyway.

    Dan (Uk)

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-27-2001 12:06 PM PT (US)     

     Probable
     Click Here to Email Probable
     Oscar® Winner
     

    Sorry for the delay in responding here. Damned weekends! Always mess up my schedule!

    Anyhoo, Peter, in reply to your query, there are a number of composers whose scores I think I would have enjoyed more for this film. These include (but are not limited to)
    - Goldsmith
    - JNH
    - Silvestri
    - Williams
    - Armstrong
    - Dudley
    - Arnold
    - Newman
    Of course, when discussing imaginary scores, it's always hard to say. I also should mention that, had any of these composers actually been affiliated with PH, I would feel bad for them. In my mind, this film and score are just a complete bust, and I'm sorry for having spent money on either of them.

    I certainly don't begrudge others their enjoyment of the score, though. I just feel that anyone whose tastes are similar to mine would be better off avoiding it.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-27-2001 05:16 PM PT (US)     

     Lancelot
     Click Here to Email Lancelot
     Oscar® Winner
     

    If we're playing fantasyland, there's a number of people who I'd rather see post here (not limited to):

    -David Fincher
    -Alexander Courage
    -Patrick Doyle
    -Christopher McQuarrie

    But if they posted here, I'd have to pity them, as well...

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-27-2001 08:08 PM PT (US)     

     Probable
     Click Here to Email Probable
     Oscar® Winner
     

    Huh?

    Are you saying you'd rather see those people post here than me?

    *crushed*

    Nice list, though. A little eclectic. Are they each the top in their field IYO?

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-27-2001 10:24 PM PT (US)     

     Lancelot
     Click Here to Email Lancelot
     Oscar® Winner
     

    Well...tops in the field? Perhaps. I've got a love/hate thing for Fincher...I don't care for his movies...or maybe I should say, I don't care for the stories of his movies, but I think he makes the movie very well...if that follows....

    I think they've all got something intelligent and interesting to say, at least. Discussion would be a little extra colorful, probably. In my smart-ass haste, I accidentally left off William Goldman and Janusz Kaminski....

    And what the hell, the devil himself, Michael Bay. I'd love to know what he has to say in defense (if anything) of all this flaming. Probably nothing--it's probably not worth it to him, but <shrug> it's the fantasy celebrity edition of moviemusic.com for a day, so...why not....?

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-27-2001 10:46 PM PT (US)     

     JJH
     Click Here to Email JJH
     Oscar® Winner
     

    quote:
    Fourth Feature films:
    Steven Spielberg - "1941"
    The Coen Bros - "Miller's Crossing"
    Joe Johnston - "Jumanji"
    Rob Reiner - "The Princess Bride"
    Ridley Scott - "Legend"
    Robert Zemekis - "Back to the Future"
    Richard Donner - "The Toy"
    James Cameron - "The Abyss"
    Tony Scott - "Revenge"
    Kevin Smith - "Dogma"
    George Lucas - "The Phantom Menace"


    For a director that's only on his 4th movie, you guys sure have a lot of ideas about what does or doesn't belong in a "Michael Bay movie"....I'm just saying this for perspective...some of these other guys went on to direct "Fargo", "Titanic", "Forrest Gump", "Gladiator", "Schindler's List".....



    with a few exceptions (TPM, Legend), every one of those movies is infinitely better than what Michael Bay has done with Pearl Harbor, as far as story is concerned.


    The Coens are YET to make a really bad movie, though Hudsucker Proxy is the closest.


    Michael Bay talks a lot but ultimately says little of substance.

    I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, but at this point, I think Emmerich and Devlin would have done better....ouch babe!

    In a film called Pearl Harbor one expects the film to be ABOUT just that, not Kate Beckinsale's love triangle.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-27-2001 11:01 PM PT (US)     

     dgoldwas
     Click Here to Email dgoldwas
     Oscar® Winner
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by Lancelot:
    Fourth Feature films:
    <snip>
    Steven Spielberg - "1941"


    Actually, if you start him with DUEL (as most people do) his 4th film was CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE THIRD KIND (after DUEL, THE SUGERLAND EXPRESS, and JAWS)
    quote:

    Robert Zemekis - "Back to the Future"


    If you start Zemeckis with THE LIFT (1972) then his 4th film is actually USED CARS. But most people consider USED CARS his first FEATURE film, so his 4th one was actually WHO FRAMED ROGER RABBIT.
    quote:

    Richard Donner - "The Toy"


    Since Donner directed X-15 (1961) and TWINKY (1969) before doing THE OMEN, wouldn't SUPERMAN be considered his 4th film?

    Anyways.... I agree with you that the 4th film doesn't define a director. But we can still judge Bay on the work he's done to date, which has ranged from impressive ("Got Milk" commercial) to crap (PEARL HARBOR).

    Dan

    Dan

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-27-2001 11:16 PM PT (US)     

     Lancelot
     Click Here to Email Lancelot
     Oscar® Winner
     

    Well, Dan Dan, the man, et. al.--

    (Yes, I have a nasty habit of referring to JJH as "et. al.")

    Thanks for your opinions....Actually, even referencing the IMDB, as I frequently do, I tried to stick pretty much to "mainstream". (Duel was pretty much a TV movie..) And since none of us (myself included) are nitpickers here....

    Hudsucker Proxy was a damn good movie, by me. Fantastic score, too, even if it owes a small debt to Khachaturian (ooh--plagurism! plagurism!) Perhaps that it was co-written by Sam Raimi leaves it a little "off center" in the Coen Bros' record, but it's one of those you've got to watch twice....

    But hell! We're talking about Pearl Harbor, here....y'know...the emotionally wrenching, 2001 Box Office Hit, "Oh, I so wannabe Best Picture!" film by the innovative Michael Bay and Master-of-the-Blockbuster Jerry Bruckheimer....

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-28-2001 07:50 AM PT (US)     

     PeterK
     Click Here to Email PeterK
     FishChip
     

    Here's an opinion: I think this anal nitpicky stuff is pretty boring. It's not even to the point, so hoot-hoooot cares?

    Here's a question for everyone who bought this soundtrack and doesn't like it (Probable, Hasta, Dan Dan, etc.):

    How many times have you listened to this score after seeing the film? If your answer is more than "1," please tell us WHY.

    [Message edited by PeterK on 05-28-2001]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-28-2001 10:32 AM PT (US)     

     Hasta
     Oscar® Winner
     

    PeterK I've listened to it several times after seeing the film, and I never said that I dislike the album, just the score as heard in film. As an album I'd give it a ***. I still find it quite enjoyable, but the short running time and extreme repetativeness of it makes it deserving of nothing more. Like Perfect Storm the first four tracks are almost identical and the theme grows tired on you (at least me), but tracks 5-9 I enjoy immensely. It's actually a very good album, I just wish there was some diversity among the first half. Also, I'd have to agree with JJH on the fact that Emmerich and Devlin would have done a better job. In fact, I know they would have.

    NP: The Edge (Goldsmith) ***/*****

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-28-2001 11:18 AM PT (US)     

     Scott
     Click Here to Email Scott
     Oscar® Winner
     

    You know, I am beginning to think there is something wrong with me mentally (which to some wouldn't be a big surprise I gather).

    Let's start with the movie. I pretty much agree with Peter here. Just like to add that I thought the movie was way too long and the romance part a little too predictable. I do like the fact that the Japanese were portarait with a little more digninty and humanity than could have been done. I wouldn't see the movie again and could have watched it on video without thinking " Gheese, would have loved to see it on the big screen".

    The score: I am not a big Zimmer fan, although I do like a lot of his percussion, rythim driven parts. Yet I liked this one. It fit the movie and actually gave it a weird connection between the images and the more modern music. I liked the main theme and it really didn't bother me the many times it was deployed. I am a little thrown off with the soprano voice, can't understand the meaning behind that one...but whatever. Actually, I don't think the theme was more or less used than Barry or Horner ususally do...so.

    Some jewels of the movie: Is it me or was Cuba Gooding, Jr one of the very best parts of the movie? I just don't know, he seemed to have a precense in the few scenes that he had which made me wish the film was more about his character than the Cain/Abel love connection we were subjected to for two hours. The Japanese portraial. They are human afterall...I always suspected that. Jon Voight's performance...man did he look at times like the real thing. In fact, come to think of it, the smaller performaces were the ones that stuck with me the longest. Hmmm...


    Anyways, I'm out.


    Scott

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-28-2001 12:25 PM PT (US)     

     Camillu
     Click Here to Email Camillu
     Oscar® Winner
     

    I've heard it about 4 times so far
    (which is a lot during exam time)

    Film opens here Wednesday week however.
    (which is quite soon considering - Atlantis will be here for Christmas. I just hope upon hope that LOTR has a worldwide release, which it probably will have)

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-28-2001 12:45 PM PT (US)     

     dgoldwas
     Click Here to Email dgoldwas
     Oscar® Winner
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by PeterK:
    How many times have you listened to this score after seeing the film? If your answer is more than "1," please tell us WHY.

    I listened to it TWICE, but heard it three times.

    I listened to it on the album as an initial listen; I suffered through it in the film, then I listened to the album to finalize my thoughts which are quite publically available in my CD review.

    After the review went up, I filed the CD away, and doubt I will listen to it again, unless for reference.

    Dan


    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-28-2001 07:54 PM PT (US)     

     Lancelot
     Click Here to Email Lancelot
     Oscar® Winner
     

    Your suffering assures your place in Valhalla...

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-28-2001 08:10 PM PT (US)     

     Probable
     Click Here to Email Probable
     Oscar® Winner
     

    quote:
    Originally posted by PeterK:
    How many times have you listened to this score after seeing the film? If your answer is more than "1," please tell us WHY.

    I listened to it once in-film and 4 times on the album. The first two on the album were to make sure that I was giving the score a fair chance and not jumping to hasty conclusions. The second two were because after I used it as a coaster(incidentally scratching it and beer-staining it) it skipped a lot and amused me. It sounded like a small-bar DJ scratching on Zimmer.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 05-28-2001 09:38 PM PT (US)     
     

    Old Infopop Software by UBB

    © 1998-2011, The MovieMusic Company