-
Message Boards

Movie Soundtracks
CROUCHING TIGER, etc...: Just a kung-fu movie (and not even a great one!)
Archive of old forum. No more postings.
Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.
Author
Topic: CROUCHING TIGER, etc...: Just a kung-fu movie (and not even a great one!)

André Lux

Oscar® Winner

Remember those kung-fu movies we use to see on TV reprises? Well, CROUCHING TIGER, HIDDEN DRAGON is just another one, only made with more money and stellar cast. It's a chienese movie for the occident - no wonder was box-office flop at China and a blockbuster in the rest of the world, collecting inclusive several Oscar nominations.It's not a bad movie, but it isn't that MASTERPIECE some "intelctuals" are crying around. The fight scenes aren't that impressive nor believable (althought well choreographed), plus director Ang Lee doesn't know where to put the camera, making action sequences confuse and truncated.
All those people flying around and walking on walls didn't work well also. In the begining one even tries to "enter" in the movie's spirit, but after the third fight we get tired and the movie begins to look ridiculous, taking involuntary laughs from the audience. Not even the Jedi Knights of "Star Wars" do so many ludicrous acrobatics - and they use the "force", remember!The actors seems very uncomfortable on their acting too, perhaps because they were forced to speak on ancient Mandarin, what let them tongue-tied and looking fake - the chinese audiences felt the same.
The screenplay is too much episodic, harming the movie's fluency. Beides that, the main plot (the Jade Fox situation) is quite weak and senseless. Also, the "powers" of the young Jen are never well explained, since in one sequence she beats an entire army of angry men easily, but in another scene she is easily defeated by Yun Fat using a thin stick. Ok, the guy is suposed to be the big boss, but that's away too much...
But the movie ultimate sin is the lack of humor and magic, registered marks of this kind of movie, and something necessary to make all those absurd situations digestible.
CROUCHING TIGER... wants to be taken "seriously" and end looking somehow ridiculous.The score by Tan-Dun is quite good and deserves the Oscar.
All in all, those Bruce Lee and Jackie Chan movies are much more fun to watch and features some really impressive fights!
[Message edited by André Lux on 03-02-2001]
posted 03-02-2001 01:37 PM PT (US) 
Quill
Oscar® Winner

I'm with Andre on this one...I found the fight scenes stirring, but the rest of the story an incoherent mess.I'll buy the DVD for the fights scenes, but I can't jump on the bandwagon for this one.
posted 03-02-2001 01:51 PM PT (US) 
PeterK

FishChip

So, the movie was an incoherent mess, but the score deserves the Oscar? Please explain.I always wondered why Jerry Goldsmith didn't win the Oscar for Bad Girls, perhaps an answer may come forth now!
posted 03-02-2001 02:39 PM PT (US) 
ActionGuy

Oscar® Winner

I totally agree, I don't think CTHD is all it's hyped up to be. To be honest, i was completely bored when the fight scenes weren't going on. Of course, if anyone up here at my film school finds out that I've said this I'll most likely be lynched. There's my 2 cents.Rich D.
posted 03-02-2001 03:13 PM PT (US) 
DeadPoet
Oscar® Winner

Andre, once again you've criticized a movie I've found to be great (maybe not classic, but great), and have given further proof that you really don't know good movies when you watch them
It's only opinion, I know, but what movies do you like, man? Anyway, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon is a fantastic movie. And please, God, do not criticize Ang Lee. I've already mentioned how much I think Tim Burton is a terrific director and will have a huge influence on my films (if I ever direct any), but his influence will pale in comparison to Lee's influence on me. The man is a genius, and directed the finest movie I have ever seen ("The Ice Storm"). He knows how to direct, and he knows how to do it damn well. He's brilliant. 'Nuff said.
As for the score, I liked it. I thought it fit the movie well. Haven't picked up a copy yet, but I plan to.
--Jason S.
[Message edited by DeadPoet on 03-02-2001]
posted 03-02-2001 03:43 PM PT (US) 
Scott

Oscar® Winner

Every person I recommended this movie to loved it. Yet, that doesn't say much.All I can say is this, the movie is based on a fable, it isn't ment to be super real. I find the movie to be outstanding. Much fun.
To say the fight scenes were awful (or whatever words you chose, Andre) is something I can't understand. I thought they were majestic, beautiful, acrobatic, and as graceful as a ballet scene. The whole story was very well told, (if one takes the time and skill to actually read the subtitles) and some of the camera actions, the way it moved with the fighting scenes were unbelieveable. The scene in the trees with the rather subdued score alone is just amazing. Just another Kung Fu movie? I don't think so...
Scottposted 03-02-2001 04:21 PM PT (US) 
Quill
Oscar® Winner

I actually think I might have enjoyed the film more if I hadn't read the subtitles...good thing it was in Mandarin, most of the lines were stiffer than a hardwood floor.My fiance has told me that I have to be a woman to understand why our young heroine in the story was such a moody pill..but to me she was just plain annoying. Her crowning moment was leaping to her death...I didn't applaud though...the arthouse crowd in Santa Cruz would have stoned me.
posted 03-02-2001 04:36 PM PT (US) 
Mark Olivarez

Oscar® Winner

quote:
Originally posted by Quill:
Her crowning moment was leaping to her death...I didn't applaud though...the arthouse crowd in Santa Cruz would have stoned me.Gee thanks now you went and ruined the whole friggin movie for me!!!!!

posted 03-02-2001 05:00 PM PT (US) 
H Rocco
Oscar® Winner

I too think this picture is overrated, and remarkably ordinary-looking for a picture now up for the Best Cinematography Oscar. Although I do recognize the difficulty involved in shooting those lovely aerial battles.The picture has its good points, but there are far better and more adventurous pictures in the same genre and idiom (e.g. ZU: WARRIORS OF THE SACRED MOUNTAIN and A CHINESE GHOST STORY).
I disagree with Andre about the acting, however. I thought Michelle Yeoh in particular was superlative, and absolutely was robbed when it came to the nominations. If she'd been speaking English, would it have been easier for the nominators to realize how strong and subtle, and deeply demanding, that performance was?
posted 03-02-2001 05:39 PM PT (US) 
JJH

Oscar® Winner

Crouching Tiger is the best Star Wars movie yet made.
posted 03-02-2001 09:52 PM PT (US) 
Lou Goldberg

Oscar® Winner

Having seen a large number of Hong Kong films, I felt I'd been over this ground before. Although the film has become the highest-grossing foreign film of all time (beating Life is Beautiful a few weeks back), the film is a big bomb in Asia, where everyone knows it's just a chop socky movie with actors on wires and weak martial arts.In the first few minutes, almost like a checklist, we learn Chow Yun Fat needs to avenge his master's death, retrieve another master's stolen sword, and has a love that his life as a monk and warrior has forced him to unrequite. This is so Chinese film cliche that it's like ordering a combo with fried rice, egg roll, and fortune cookie.
There are things I liked, of course, the best being the whole fight-romance between the young girl and the bandit, which was both sexy and funny, but felt like a seperate movie from the rest.
I have to agree with Rocco that Michelle Yeoh is great in this film but then I think she's great in every movie even the James Bond movie.
Oh, and I don't think she literally jumps to her death. I think there is some ground there where you could see her jump as a jump in quotes. The real point is that she's been a fiercely independent person and that any situation where she was bridled would be difficult to her. Training at the temple and living with the bandit is as much as a trap as her arranged marriage was going to be and she still longs for escape. So, I took her jump as a kind of fantasy metaphor--she flies into the mist, not falls like a rock.
posted 03-03-2001 01:01 AM PT (US) 
Mark Olivarez

Oscar® Winner

AURGHHHHH!!!!! Even more spoilers!!!!!
NP: Chicken Runposted 03-03-2001 06:19 AM PT (US) 
H Rocco
Oscar® Winner

Good analysis, Lou.Mark is playing CHICKEN RUN? BAN him, PeterK! BAN HIM!!!!
NP: CHICKEN RUN (uh-oh)
posted 03-03-2001 11:31 AM PT (US) 
André Lux

Oscar® Winner

I agree 100% with Lou and Rocco.Michelle and the fight between the two girls were the only good thing about the movie.
People who love this movie probably have never seem a REAL chinese kung-fu movie...

posted 03-03-2001 01:22 PM PT (US) 
Scott

Oscar® Winner

Well...all I can say is...I liked it. So, sue me.
Scottyposted 03-03-2001 01:25 PM PT (US) 
JJH

Oscar® Winner

I've seen a real Chinese kung-fu movie.why does that mean I have to dislike CTHD?
JJ, off to study Mandarin chinese in an attempt to debunk this movie
posted 03-03-2001 02:16 PM PT (US) 
André Lux

Oscar® Winner

quote:
Originally posted by Scott:
Well...all I can say is...I liked it. So, sue me.
ScottyLike I said in my original message, I liked it too. Just think it's quite overrated. I have seem tons of better chinese kung-fu movies before, inclusive with better fights and more believable flights...
So sue me now!

posted 03-03-2001 03:26 PM PT (US) 
HAL 2000
Oscar® Winner

I saw this movie in Belgium last year before all the American hype and even then I thought it was a beautiful film. Growing up amidst the Kung fu craze of the 70's and seeing a healthy share of fun but crude chop socky flicks this one seemeed to be more than a freshening of the genre as everyone seems to state. To me it is more of a new kung fu genre.I thoroughly enjoyed the thoughtful balance of mysticism, feudal politics, romance and mythos. The dancelike fight scenes were surreal. I was completely captivated.
Critical hype is a tricky thing. While the critics and the academy awards have had a share in inflating many people's expectations, I will say that this a movie that audiences seem to have discovered on their own. I'm glad I saw it before all the hoopla tainted my experience.
posted 03-04-2001 06:07 AM PT (US) 
Dan Brecher

Oscar® Winner

I agree in that the film is over hyped somewhat. While I too liked it, I just didn't think it was some orgasmic masterpiece a lot of critics seem to think it is.I got a sense of confusion in the direction for CTHD, with the story not knowing which characters to focus on most.
Is it another example of style over content? Somewhat, yes, and then I didn't even think it looked THAT stunning either, very soft, and in the desert scenes, messy, look to it which kind of bugged me, and I agree with Andre in that visually Lee's direction was very jumpy..
I'd hope the cinematographic problems I spoke of would have been the print I saw, but I know a number of people who felt the same way, and even the DVD anamorphic transfer looks soft.
Some of it dazzled me, the fighting up in the treetops for instance, but on the whole it left a lot to be desired. I just don't feel it is a masterpiece in storytelling many claim it to be.
One thing though, regarding thow believable the fights are, CTHD is based on a fairy tale/folk tale of some sort, the fights intentionaly touch upon the mystical and I had no problem with it. This story source was nto clear to most seeing the film, so they laughed at it giving snide remaks such as "hah, that couldn't happen"...and so on.
So in the end it's one of those "Nice movie......but...." things for me.

Another thing that I keep thinking about regarding the mass publics love for the film is the possibility that they've never seen anything like it on the big screen so love it immediately, without having experienced something infinately better theatrically. I call this, the 'Gladiator' effect... *hides*
Dan (UK)
[Message edited by Dan Brecher on 03-04-2001]
posted 03-04-2001 09:39 AM PT (US) 
Shaun Rutherford

Oscar® Winner

.......to her death?I was pissed that I didn't get to see if she got her wish. Damn foreign films!
Shaun
posted 03-04-2001 12:04 PM PT (US) 
H Rocco
Oscar® Winner

Foreign films should be banned. If they can't be bothered to talk English good, I got no interest.Anybody else here familiar with the old folktale "Magic Monkey and the White-Boned Demon?" There've been a couple of Japanese movie versions of it, one quite dreadful. Surely there are numerous HK/Chinese/Taiwanese versions? That would make a kickass picture.
NP: damned if I know, but it is probably music
posted 03-04-2001 02:24 PM PT (US) 
Kross
Oscar® Winner

I too did not AT FIRST like CTHD as much as I wanted to. Before you shred it to pieces, wait till you see it again. I felt the same as all of you above the first time, then tonight, after seeing it again, I loved it. Is it the greatest martial arts film of all time? I am not gonna even call it a martial arts film, so to say it is just another kung fu flick or any other of those quick puts is pretty lame. See it again and you may, may just love it. I now saw things I did not before, I now focused on things I did not before, I now respect Ang Lee much more than I did before. I now love CTHD, all because of a second viewing. I now consider it a great film, the best ever? No, good yes. See it again and your opinion will change.I respect how different the "feel" of the film is compared to all the other martial arts films, so in that sense I will not call it one. I did love the philosophy involved even though sometimes simple, directed well through visual wonder. CTHD deserves the praise it has gotten. See it 2x and you might just agree.
posted 03-04-2001 10:01 PM PT (US) 
Kross
Oscar® Winner

A few things...because it was a flop in China does that make it a bad film? If it is a flop anywhere doe sit make it bad? If it is a smash hit does it make it good? usually if a film makes huge dough it flat out sucks! Kung-Fu flicks are Kung-Fu flicks, CTHD may border on one, but in the end is far from it...hence why it flopped since in China they want Kung-Fu, CTHD is not Kung-Fu. CTHD has deeper meanings...maybe done before but done well thanks to Ang Lee's great direction. Sure sure you whine " It is hard to see...I was confused" bla bla bla,,.,see it agian and you will not say that...trust me.There are deeper films out there, but I loved CTHD nontheless.
With the crap that Oscar has chosen this time, CTHD deserves to win compared to Gladiator and Erin(which was very very very stupid) Brockovich!
[Message edited by Kross on 03-04-2001]
posted 03-04-2001 10:09 PM PT (US) 
André Lux

Oscar® Winner

Sorry, but I don't think I will change my mind about this movie on a second view.One was just enough. And I don't think Ang Lee is such a great director. He did a nice movie, THE WEDDING BANQUET, mostly because it has a good screenplay. But his SENSE AND SENSIBILITY is an awful movie which is Lee's distant and dry direction's fault.
I preffer Zhang Yimou myself. His chinese movies (like RAISE THE RED LANTERN or FAREWELL MY CONCUBINE), althought not about martial arts, have much more magic, poetry and beautiful images than any of Ang Lee's.
posted 03-05-2001 04:52 AM PT (US) 
Quill
Oscar® Winner

In the end I suppose I enjoyed....but it amazes me how many critics jumped on the bandwagon for a movie with every fantasy/fable cliche in the book. Don't get me wrong, it is a beautiful movie to look at, but while it tries to be deep, its really jus t a shallow pond
posted 03-05-2001 07:37 AM PT (US) Old Infopop Software by UBB
