The MovieMusic Store shopping cart   |  sign in
    SEARCH  
  • Home
  • Browse Store
    • New Soundtrack CDs
    • Top Sellers
    • Low Price New CDs
    • Used CDs
    • Soundtrack Compilations
    • Score Composers
    • Soundtrack Labels
    • Soundtracks by Year
    • ... detailed search page
  • Store Info
    • Happy Customers!
    • $1 Shipping
    • Accepted Payment Methods
    • Safe Shopping Guarantee
    • Shipping Rates & Policies
    • Our Privacy Policy
    • About Us
  • Help Center
    • My Account
    • How to Order
    • Search Tips
    • Return/Refund Policy
    • Cancelling Your Order
    • Contact the Store
  • The Lobby
  •   Message Boards
      Movie Soundtracks
      Nothing like flogging a dead horse, but.........

    Archive of old forum. No more postings.

    Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.

    Author
    Topic:   Nothing like flogging a dead horse, but.........

     SPOR
     Click Here to Email SPOR
     Oscar® Winner
     

    I happened to catch Gladiator for a second time, on this occassion, in the company of a friend who is currently taking a screenwriting course at the Academy for Art & Entertainment out of Santa Monica College. Because his prof considered the screenplay to Spartacus to be amongst the 5 best written, I thought it might be a great opportunity for him to compare these two variants on a similar theme.

    Our conclusions:

    1, It's overlong by at least 30 minutes.
    2. There is barely a moment of silence throught 2 1/2 hrs, what with Zimmer's score playing backup to almost every scene. I found it suffocating the second time through. Much like a VHI retrospective.
    3. There are 3 very strong performances, each by film veterans:

    a) Richard Harris's melancholy Marcus Aurelius
    b) Oliver Reed's taciturn Proximo
    c) Derek Jakobi's ascerbic Crassus

    4. There are 3 very worthwhile action sequences:

    a) The opening battle up until the slo-mo hand to hand combat sequence. Scott's vista shot of the advancing legions painted in black and blues, the sky filled with arrows, leaves a strong impression in the imagination. The only drawback being Zimmer's one dimensional theme which more or less just hypes the machismo level like he has done for every other testosterone driven movie he's been involved with. It says little else beyond that.

    b) The recreation of the Battle of Carthage sequence. The only one which made my repeat viewing worthwhile. Pure bloodsport. You'll have to excuse my delight in watching an archer be hewn in half along with other bloody misdeeds of javelin and sword. Sheer visceral pleasure. Truly nasty stuff.

    c) Maximus's escape from Proximo's barracks, beginning at the point where he enters the glen. The misty shot of the horse beneath the tree took me back to LEGEND. Very well lit, nicely photographed sequence though it only lasts over a minute.

    5. The movie plays like a 2 1/2 hour endoresment for George Bush Jr.. What, with all this blather about restoring Rome to the people from the corrupted hands of amorally tarnished Emperor. My companion suggested offhandedly that the film must have been financed by the NRA.

    6. Zimmer's adoption of other sources to suit his own needs:

    a) I think the best proof of the composer's want of inpiration is best summarized by my companion's observation, he only having a casual acquaintance with my CD collection, that the main theme sounded all too similar to Vangelis's 1492 theme. Personally, apart from the composer's world beat affectations, the score's greatest drawback, apart from the formentioned macho main theme, is that there is way too much of it. Also, anyone happen to notice the similarity between the Zimmer's conspiracy music and Williams's music for JFK. Or, that if Mahler never wrote a single note, Zimmer would have to call on another venerable composer to fill in the 40 minutes gap of silence that would be created.

    7. The second time through though, my ass got really, really sore. I was much amused though by all the girlies in the audience rushing to cling their respective boyfriends when the blood started spilling. Sometimes watching and listening to the audience is more fun than the movie itself.


    NP: Mahler's 5th (2nd movement)


    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-28-2000 07:45 PM PT (US)     

     Chris Kinsinger
     Click Here to Email Chris Kinsinger
     Oscar® Winner
     

    SPOR, I agree with every statement that you have made above, save one:

    quote:
    5. The movie plays like a 2 1/2 hour endoresment for George Bush Jr.. What, with
    all this blather about restoring Rome to the people from the corrupted hands of amorally tarnished Emperor. My companion suggested offhandedly that the film must have been financed by the NRA.

    The following is submitted for your consideration:

    Your friend is valiantly endeavoring to find a similar social significance in the Gladiator script as that which can easily be identified in the Spartacus script, which was written by a McCarthy Era blacklisted author.

    Sorry...no cigar.

    Your friend is looking waaaaay too hard for attributes which simply do not exist, and my view is that if you watch Chicken Run with him, you will also receive a similarly politicized analysis.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-28-2000 09:00 PM PT (US)     

     TimT
     Click Here to Email TimT
     Oscar® Winner
     

    quote:
    Nothing like flogging a dead horse, but

    Now, what the heck does that mean??

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-28-2000 09:23 PM PT (US)     

     André Lux
     Click Here to Email André Lux
     Oscar® Winner
     


    I agree with everything you wrote SPOR, but most of all with:

    quote:
    5. The movie plays like a 2 1/2 hour endoresment for George Bush Jr.. What, with all this blather about restoring Rome to the people from the corrupted hands of amorally tarnished Emperor. My companion suggested offhandedly that the film must have been financed by the NRA.

    This is quite possible, not to say obivious.
    Here in Brazil, about 10 years ago, a mini-series produced by our bigger network televion was made specifically to help the election of a Neo-Liberal candidate to the Presidency, against one from the Workers Party.
    The story of the series? Well... it's about a renegade warrior in the "middle ages" who must return to his country to overthrow the actual government, restoring the country to the people from the corrupted hands of amorally tarnished monarchs.

    The guy was elected.

    Latter he was impeached because of corruption and other things, but they didn't care much. The door was open...


    Funny how little power people attribute to movies while brainwashing people, even knowing that someone would spend 200 million bucks just to produce one...

    [This message has been edited by André Lux (edited 28 June 2000).]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-28-2000 09:45 PM PT (US)     

     SPOR
     Click Here to Email SPOR
     Oscar® Winner
     

    Bare in mind Chris...it's my own take on the thing. As we've all gathered from another thread, there are those of us who believe Hollywood exists in a vaccuum and those of who don't, myself, obviously, being one who adheres to the latter. And, I won't continue any further since this path has been well trod before...

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-28-2000 09:56 PM PT (US)     

     H Rocco
     Oscar® Winner
     

    If McCain had been the candidate, those of you so inclined would have said GLADIATOR was manifestly an advertisement for HIS candidacy (and I could draw more vivid correlations between his life and the GLADIATOR story than anyone could for the pathetic, infinitely coddled and privileged George W. Bush.)

    Consider how long it takes to write, develop and produce a movie, at least in Hollywood. Consider also that GLADIATOR is, more than anything, a knockoff of DEMETRIUS AND THE GLADIATORS. Consider further that all three founding members of DreamWorks, which produced the movie, are die-hard Clintonites.

    A pro-BUSH message? You're really reaching here, people.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-28-2000 10:27 PM PT (US)     

     SPOR
     Click Here to Email SPOR
     Oscar® Winner
     

    Let me clear this mess up right now before everyone else gets the wrong idea! The statement: "plays like a 2 1/2 hr endoresment of George Bush Jr....", is just that, a casual statement. Not, as some have already concluded, a serious attempt on my part to append some devious political motive to the filmmakers. As for my companions comment, I would suggest rereading the statement...you'll notice the word "offhandedly". After 2 1/2 hour mediocre film, neither one of us was expecting the other to compose an essay on the topic. Flippant comments sufficed. They are to be taken in this light, and no other.

    I will stand by my second post though.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 06-28-2000 11:02 PM PT (US)     
     

    Old Infopop Software by UBB

    © 1998-2011, The MovieMusic Company