-
Message Boards

Movie Soundtracks
Less is More?
Archive of old forum. No more postings.
Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.
Author
Topic: Less is More?

HollywoodComposers.com

Oscar® Winner

Here's something I've been pondering. What's better:To do one good film, rather than accept poor films to score.
I makes me wonder why some composers accept such poor films.
NP The Omen
posted 04-13-2000 01:26 PM PT (US) 
sabbey

Oscar® Winner

Maybe it's just me, but personally I would much prefer to have many good scores to poor films, than one great score to an good film.
Other than that, I too wonder why or how some composers get the scoring assignments they do.
Regards,
Sean Robert Abbey[This message has been edited by sabbey (edited 13 April 2000).]
posted 04-13-2000 01:48 PM PT (US) 
Lancelot

Oscar® Winner

Poor films need scores, too.And you never know when a score just might transcend the visual matter it accompanies.
posted 04-13-2000 01:56 PM PT (US) 
joan hue

Oscar® Winner

You ask an interesting question. I would posit that film
composers are often NOT aware of the fact that a film
may end up being a loser. I believe (could be wrong) that
many are hired by the directors/producers before the movies
are started. I.E. I assume Spielberg books Williams for each
of his movies long before he begins filming.An exception to this would be when a composer is hired after
a score has been rejected like in The Scarlet Letter. (Several
composers in this case.)Anyway, a composer is hired early in the process, is contracted,
and then given the movie at various phases. Just this year Morricone
scored Mission to Mars, which was a critical UNsuccess. Yet,
he saw names like DePalma, Robbins, and Sinise. Based on their
previous work, I’d assume a strong movie would emerge. Then
there is Reindeer Games (which I have not seen) which died a fast
death at the box office. At one point, Goldsmith was to score it; then
came Silvestri. These two composers are looking at a movie directed
by an outstanding director, Frankenheimer, and that hosts a strong leading
cast, so why not accept this movie? Maybe I’m wrong, but there are
times when composers just can’t predict the final outcome of movie.
And whether or not the movie is good or bad, they will still be paid, and
if their score is solid, their CD’s will sell, albeit it does help to have a
box office smash.Then there are those hidden little gems that no one expects will emerge.
In 1976 Bill Conti scored a movie scripted and starring an unknown
named Sly Stallone and that was directed by R. Advildsen, who really had
directed only one previous noteworthy movie. And look at the love
affair (and Oscars) America had for Rocky. Sometime movies that we (and
maybe composers) think won’t be box office hits, surprise us.Seems to me like it is all one big gamble.
posted 04-13-2000 03:05 PM PT (US) 
HollywoodComposers.com

Oscar® Winner

I guess it's easy to say after the movie has come out that I wonder why they did the score, altough I wasn't really talking about the ones that we noticed at the boxoffice, but more the ones that they did but time forgot.I must say though, I have turned down 3 feature films myself after seeing the rushes, so it's possible to get out of it.
plus there are the sequels so composers should already know what they are letting them in for.
ie.
Police Academy 6: City Under Seige
Police Academy: Mission to Moscow
Death Stalker 3
eathstalker and the Warriors from Hell
Revenge of the Nerds: Nerds in LoveNot forgetting the Terrible Title Giveaways
ie
The Screaming Skull
The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up ZombiesSomething tells me an alarm bell should start ringing right about now
posted 04-13-2000 03:32 PM PT (US) 
joan hue

Oscar® Winner

Hollywoodcomposers.com,Would you share with us some of the films you have scored and those you've rejected? Dying to know who you are if you're comfortable telling us. Thanks.
posted 04-13-2000 05:00 PM PT (US) 
HollywoodComposers.com

Oscar® Winner

Yes that's fine.Nothing much to tell though, I'll try to keep it succinct and not bore everyone.
Apart from the scoring I do a bit of writing and directing which I'm concentrating on now, apart from the hollywoodcomposers.com website

I starting writing late as my parents divorced when I was young and so I didn't really get the direction that I now know may of helped.
So at the tender age of 18 I started practicing the piano again (before the divorce I stared at 5), and I pretty much had an idea I wanted to be a musician like my father so I practised about 8 hours a day for 3 years, then I realised I had come to a point where I wasn't getting any better, and that I wouldn't 'cut it' as a gigging musician.
It was at this time that I bought the score for Batman and decided that I wanted to score films. After a few years I started sending out demo tapes to people in England (I used to live in London before I moved to the US), somehow a Director in England must have taken a tape over with him to LA and I got a call to do a Dennis Hopper movie.
...boring you yet? Sorry not much longer to go I promise
anyway, I didn't get it because I didn't have a base in LA, and they needed that because there was a 3 week deadline. Anyway I moved to LA after another call about 6 months later, and the same things happened again.
During my first year in LA, I was asked to do 6 feature films, 5 of which never happened (usual occurance), and the other one I turned down, becuase it was awful. It crossed my mind to do it because of the credit, but I prefer to go on my first instinct which was to drop it, so I did.
Anyway, about another 6 months later, and about another 4 other films that 'almost got into production', I was offered another Dennis Hopper movie, the writer somhow got hold of my tape and loved it so she passed it onto the producer and he called me, but.... The Director already had someone in mind so that never happened either.
So I decided rather than keep chasing after projects I would concentrate on my own, and just let the other films happen when they happen.
Thus my life story so far.
Stuart McDonald
posted 04-13-2000 05:30 PM PT (US) 
joan hue

Oscar® Winner

Thanks for the information, Stuart. Best of luck to you.
posted 04-13-2000 10:09 PM PT (US) 
Thor

Oscar® Winner

>>Here's something I've been pondering. What's better: To do one good film, rather than accept poor films to score. I makes me wonder why some composers accept such poor films.<<Well, composers - like the rest of us - have to make a living, you know. So they accept whatever comes their way. Unfortunately for them, sometimes "something wicked this way comes" and they're stuck with a turkey.
It's only guys like Williams, Goldsmith and Horner that can pick projects carefully and ditch others. New guys who are just starting out have to lower their demands a little (remember - Young did a lot of cheesy B or C-horror stuff early in his career, Williams did a lot of big band TV jazz, Herrmann did tons of mediocre radio stuff etc.).
But that doesn't mean that the big guys don't pick the wrong thing. As has been said already - if there's not a previous relationship between composer and director/producer/writer/etc. present - all a composer has to go with, is the strength of the names involved or the POTENTIAL of the script. That last thing is important. Usually composer are contractually attached to movies BEFORE the filming has fully materialized. This means that a film like THE HAUNTING may have started out as an interesting remake IN THEORY (and Goldsmith must have thought so too), but De Bont's eventual product has been harshly criticized (I haven't seen the film, so I cannot comment myself).
Luckily, poor films don't always mean poor scores, and the emergence of an excellent score from a poor film (THE SWARM, anyone?) is to the credit of a composer's artistic integrity/independence.
[This message has been edited by Thor (edited 14 April 2000).]
[This message has been edited by Thor (edited 14 April 2000).]
posted 04-14-2000 05:43 AM PT (US) 
HollywoodComposers.com

Oscar® Winner

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Thor:
<<Well, composers - like the rest of us - have to make a living, you know.>>The way I see it is, if you're making good movies you don't have to worry about the income so why accept a potential turkey.
And as the the other end of the spectrum, if you're starting out and you feel you need all the credits you can get, chances are you're not going to be paid for your services anyway because of the budget. Another reason to pick carefully.
So the question is, can someone make it big by starting off doing loads of awful films rather than waiting for a good one first.
A recent name that springs to mind, although not a composer is director Sam Mendes - American Beauty, he waited 10 years for the perfect project to come along and I'm sure he's glad he didn't accept 10 turkey's before it, wouldn't you?
<<Luckily, poor films don't always mean poor scores, and the emergence of an excellent score from a poor film (THE SWARM, anyone?) is to the credit of a composer's artistic integrity/independence.>>
I agree, though my question was more of a complete film question rather than just the quality of the score.
posted 04-14-2000 06:25 AM PT (US) 
MWRuger

Oscar® Winner

So many things go into making a project click that even if everything looks right, it might still not work.
HRocco has commented on Saving Private Ryan and how Spielberg makes it a better picture than it has a right to be. So if you just read the script you might reject it. It is this incredibly rare synergy that is required for everything to workWhat about films that drastically improve through editing? I heard that The Usual Suspects was vastly improved through John Ottman’s editing. The final sequence was primarily his work. Because Byran Singer and John Ottman work together so well, this gelled perfectly.
I guess I don’t have any problem seeing why a name composer might score a less than an optimal film. You just never know!
Although, the only reason that I could see that a name would score something like “The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies” is because it might be fun and he might get to score it however he wanted for a change!
posted 04-14-2000 07:39 AM PT (US) 
Thor

Oscar® Winner

Stuart:>>The way I see it is, if you're making good movies you don't have to worry about the income so why accept a potential turkey.<<
But that's the problem. You don't know beforehand whether a film will be labeled "good" or not. Of course, no one sets out to make a bad movie. But sometimes, as MWRuger touched upon, a film production doesn't "click". When you work on an artistic project COLLECTIVELY - even with a powerful director on top, you're bound to encounter certain difficulties now and then. It is usually these type of film productions that suffer the most - at least if judging by the critics (13TH WARRIOR, WATERWORLD, THE HAUNTING etc.).
In other words, you have to be a REAL "potentially-success-spotter" in order to survive in the sociodarwinistic film biz.
Anyway, while waiting for that big Sam Mendes/AMERICAN BEAUTY-like hit, what should the dedicated director do to fullfil his dreams of working with films and make a living out of it?
posted 04-14-2000 07:59 AM PT (US) 
HollywoodComposers.com

Oscar® Winner

<<while waiting for that big Sam Mendes/AMERICAN BEAUTY-like hit, what should the dedicated director do to fullfil his dreams of working with films and make a living out of it?>>Enjoy life? I don't know, but judging on the amount of B movie feature films I've seen in the editing rooms, it seems like everyone wants to make a film, no matter how bad it is. I guess I'm looking at it as doing something worthwhile with you time while your here.
By the way, I'm not talking about all those films that make it to the mass publics' attention either, so don't get me wrong, I I understand completely that those projects are impossible to predict, I'm ONLY talking about the B movies that are done for the sake of 'making a movie'.
posted 04-14-2000 08:20 AM PT (US) 
joan hue

Oscar® Winner

I personally learned a lot from Christopher Young's experience. He scored some rather
poor movies, and he was discovered because of his unique sound.I would rather score well a very poor movie
and send out my tapes to directors and producers than refuse to score at all and only be able to hope someone hears my silence.But you have, "to thine own self be true."
posted 04-14-2000 08:34 AM PT (US) 
HollywoodComposers.com

Oscar® Winner

[QUOTE]Originally posted by joan hue:<<I would rather score well a very poor movie
and send out my tapes to directors and producers than refuse to score at all and only be able to hope someone hears my silence.>>Although you can write a piece of music with a better scene created in your mind rather than a very poor movie, (at least in my experience) and then you could send that out instead. Nobody would be any the wiser.
posted 04-14-2000 08:56 AM PT (US) 
Nicolai P. Zwar

Oscar® Winner

Perhaps they do it because scoring a poor movie is still a more satisfying job to some than working at a drive in restaurant? Perhaps they just like to work?NP: Charles Koechlin THE JUNGLE BOOK
Radio Symphonie Orchester Berlin/David Zinman
(RCA Victor)posted 04-14-2000 10:51 AM PT (US) 
SabastianMedina
unregistered
Many great scores have been written for terrible films or, at least films with terrible titles.
In reference to one film mentioned above, THE SCREAMING SKULL, the estimable Ernest Gold wrote a very powerful and genuinely frightening score to this AIP quicky, a film that isn't as bad as you might think. Just another example of an A-level score to a B or C-level film.posted 04-14-2000 11:24 AM PT (US) 
HollywoodComposers.com

Oscar® Winner

Everyone has to pay their dues. I'm just saying, why do a really bad movie? Chances are if it's that bad, you'll still be working at the diner afterwards anyway.What's that saying: "you're only as good as your last credit" get too many of these bad ones and you may not be thought of for the good ones.
posted 04-14-2000 11:29 AM PT (US) 
mlw
Oscar® Winner

John Milius refers to one of his best scripts as "just another swastika on the fuselage". If it's your job, go to work.
posted 04-14-2000 11:32 AM PT (US) 
HollywoodComposers.com

Oscar® Winner

You gotta love your job though, If it ever feels like 'work' then you know somethings up.
posted 04-14-2000 11:39 AM PT (US) 
Bulldog
Oscar® Winner

It's been a while since I have written about this subject.But here's a thought that always comes to mind when I discuss it:
Jerry Goldsmith always gets criticized for scoring films like SUPERGIRL or THE SWARM, but...
is there a genius behind this?--this being the fact that in so many of the films that Goldsmith puts his imprint upon, his contribution is the most appealing part of the production.
Look at the two films already mentioned, THE BLUE MAX, THE WIND AND THE LION, LOGAN'S RUN, STAR TREK-THE MOTION PICTURE, THE FINAL CONFLICT, RAMBO, LEGEND, LIONHEART, STAR TREK V, THE RUSSIA HOUSE...
...do I really need to even include the past ten years?
While there are some gems (HOOSIERS, CHINATOWN, PATTON) and while I think that some of his choice films are much better than given credit (like THE GHOST AND THE DARKNESS or FIRST KNIGHT), a very interesting strategy seems to have been being executed for several decades now.

posted 04-14-2000 11:42 AM PT (US) 
Nicolai P. Zwar

Oscar® Winner

That's not necessarily so. Quite a few people moved up into the "A" category after scoring a bunch of b-movies. James Horner for example, was noted because of the work he did for Roger Corman. (And how much more great talent has come out of Roger Corman's schlock factory? Can you count 'em all?)
Cheap Sci-Fi and Horror movies seem to be an especially strong "breeding ground" for up coming talent.
posted 04-14-2000 11:53 AM PT (US) 
HollywoodComposers.com

Oscar® Winner

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Nicolai P. Zwar:
<<Cheap Sci-Fi and Horror movies seem to be an especially strong "breeding ground" for up coming talent.>>Talking about that, I wonder if Marco Beltrami will be recognised for more than just Horror scores as I think he has been labelled by a lot of filmmakers as a horror writer now.
posted 04-14-2000 12:03 PM PT (US) 
Nicolai P. Zwar

Oscar® Winner

That can happen to anybody, of course. But Johnny Depp was once just a Freddy Krueger victim, Sean Connery was Bond, Morricone was western. But the Son of Pink Panther is an Academy Award winner by now.
posted 04-14-2000 12:11 PM PT (US) 
HollywoodComposers.com

Oscar® Winner

OK, well whatever, everytime I see a movie that's awful I'll continue to think - "why on earth was this made", I won't be thinking "poor composer, had to work for the rent"Just my opinion, I guess you all are just going to view it differently than I. Maybe I'm just stubborn in this matter as I feel strongly about the complete film and not just a job.
posted 04-14-2000 12:27 PM PT (US) 
James

Oscar® Winner

quote:
The Lion King also made me reassess my situation in this town. You can go two ways. I admit that standing on the stage getting an Oscar is the most seductive moment one can have in one's life. It is truly overwhelming. And then you go, wow, if I just carry on writing nice music like this, I can have this moment again. It's a very Faustian sort of thing. That's why I did the exact opposite, scoring for truly offensive projects like The Fan. Just to shake myself out of the desire for that Oscar experience. Otherwise I would just stagnate. Nothing new would happen. For me, it's still about trying to write decent music. Ironically, despite all the scores I've written, there are very few I'm proud of.- Hans Zimmer
posted 04-14-2000 05:47 PM PT (US) 
SabastianMedina
unregistered
If you don't work, you don't get experience, and experience brings exposure. Virtually every well know film composer has paid his/her dues (likewise writers, directors, and cinematographers). The great cinematographer Vilmos Zigmond got his start doing Al Adamson films, for Christ's sake, you can't get any lower than that!There's nothing better than experience.
posted 04-14-2000 06:59 PM PT (US) 
Nicolai P. Zwar

Oscar® Winner

I always used to wonder "how come so many (often highly expensive) Hollywood movies are so utterly bad? Who payrolled this bomb?" Knowing a bit more about "Hollywood" from the inside I am much more inclined to wonder nowadays "how come once in a while a good one gets made? How did the script survive the suits?". But every once in a while a good movie DOES get made, and I'm thankful for that.
posted 04-16-2000 04:29 AM PT (US) Old Infopop Software by UBB
