The MovieMusic Store shopping cart   |  sign in
    SEARCH  
  • Home
  • Browse Store
    • New Soundtrack CDs
    • Top Sellers
    • Low Price New CDs
    • Used CDs
    • Soundtrack Compilations
    • Score Composers
    • Soundtrack Labels
    • Soundtracks by Year
    • ... detailed search page
  • Store Info
    • Happy Customers!
    • $1 Shipping
    • Accepted Payment Methods
    • Safe Shopping Guarantee
    • Shipping Rates & Policies
    • Our Privacy Policy
    • About Us
  • Help Center
    • My Account
    • How to Order
    • Search Tips
    • Return/Refund Policy
    • Cancelling Your Order
    • Contact the Store
  • The Lobby
  •   Message Boards
      Movie Soundtracks
      Blair Witch Project ending: HUH?!?

    Archive of old forum. No more postings.

    Please visit our new forum, The MovieMusic Lobby, to post new topics.

    Author
    Topic:   Blair Witch Project ending: HUH?!?

     SFT
     Click Here to Email SFT
     OscarŪ Winner
     

    Okay guys, I finally saw The Blair Witch Project this evening, and I loved it. One of the best horrorfilms in the last 20 years...but one thing is bothering me: The ending....I donīt get it. Normally I belive in the concept, that you get out of a film whatever you bring to it...but this time I want an explanation. Do any of you have one?

    SFT

    NP: Independence Day Expanded, David Arnold ***/*****

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-02-1999 02:10 PM PT (US)     

     Captain Howdy
     Click Here to Email Captain Howdy
     OscarŪ Winner
     

    I cant remember if this was in the actual movie or not, but I'm sure it was said in the Sci-Fi documentary. In one of the legends about the Blair Witch, the one about the hermit guy who killed all the children, it said he was told by the Blair Witch to have one child stand in the corner facing the wall while he killed another one. I realized this after I watched the "mockumentary" again recently.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-02-1999 02:27 PM PT (US)     

     robin4
     Click Here to Email robin4
     OscarŪ Winner
     

    Are you guys stupid? Didn't you get that the first time you saw it?

    Just kidding... I remember when I saw it that the ending freaked me out, especially when you saw him standing in the corner. It was then that I remember them talking about that at the beginning of the movie. Boy, that one scene played over and over in my head the next day until I almost went nuts. And I usually don't get scared.

    N.P. Stargate <*****/*****> (Not many get that rating, but this certainly does.)

    [This message has been edited by robin4 (edited 10-02-99).]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-02-1999 05:01 PM PT (US)     

     Scott
     Click Here to Email Scott
     OscarŪ Winner
     

    SFT,
    the ending is not the easiest to explain.
    As everyone else correctly remembered, early on the film makers documented a story of 30 kids missing and later found dead. A old guy was arrested for the crime and later confessed. He told the police he had one kid stand in the corner while he killed the other one. The reason he had the kid stand in the corner is that he felt the eyes of the child staring at him when he did his killing, thus he had them stand facing the corner.
    Now to the ending, obviously one of the guys was standing facing the corner while the girl ran downstairs and apparently was killed. We also can assume it was not the old guy, since he was already dead. We are left with three possibilites.
    1. It was the old man's ghost.(Would make sense, since our three film makers were awakened one night buy childrens noises and the tent shacking. A possible warning to get out of there?).
    2. It was someone else who knew about the story.
    3.It was the one who winded up missing in the first place.
    You decide.
    Scott

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-02-1999 10:20 PM PT (US)     

     S Smith
    unregistered  

    Like I said before, I thought the ending was the best part of the film, because it manifested the stories we'd heard about the Blair Witch legend.

    And it's obvious that the ending was faked and all three ran off and joined some weird orgy cult.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-02-1999 11:29 PM PT (US)     

     Jeron
     Click Here to Email Jeron
     OscarŪ Winner
     

    Hahaha, Smith - that's definitely an interesting take on the ending. :-)

    ~Jeron

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-02-1999 11:36 PM PT (US)     

     SFT
     Click Here to Email SFT
     OscarŪ Winner
     

    I hope this doesīnt make me sound like and idiot, but something the good captain said made me corious: What do you mean "Sci-Fi documentary"? Is the movie based on an actual legend???

    SFT

    NP: Midnight Run, Danny Elfman *****/*****

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-03-1999 03:58 AM PT (US)     

     robin4
     Click Here to Email robin4
     OscarŪ Winner
     

    Isn't that the kid in the corner, you know, Mike I think the name was. The kid that went into the house with her. I believe that was him.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-03-1999 12:00 PM PT (US)     

     Captain Howdy
     Click Here to Email Captain Howdy
     OscarŪ Winner
     

    SFT: There was a "mockumentary", meaning it was all made up but for someone who doesnt know the movie is fake, its very real looking. They have people like town historians and museum experts telling about evidence and it basically tells happenings in earlier years about the Blair Witch. Very well made and convincing. It ran on Sci-Fi before the movie came out quite often and was an hour long. You can most likely still catch it, but if you really want it, I'm sure you could order it from the Sci-Fi channel online store.

    NP: The Horse Whisperer (Newman) ****/5

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-03-1999 12:23 PM PT (US)     

     Matt
     Click Here to Email Matt
     OscarŪ Winner
     

    the guy in the corner was Mike. And yes, it was based on the old man having one child stand in the corner while he killed the other. SFT: on the sci Fi channel there was a fake documentary on the legend of the Blair Witch(I emphasize FAKE) where the story is told about the old man. If you get a chance to see it, the mockumentary is also quite good.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-03-1999 12:57 PM PT (US)     

     S Smith
    unregistered  

    The "mockumentary" was just part of the genius marketing that drew the people into the theaters.

    I don't know why, but I knew all along it was fake, while other people I knew thought that it was real. Come on. It'd be a snuff film.

    [This message has been edited by S Smith (edited 10-04-99).]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-03-1999 11:08 PM PT (US)     

     Crono/Kyp
     Click Here to Email Crono/Kyp
     OscarŪ Winner
     

    Just rented it last night.

    To put it simply. It sucked. It was lane.

    BUT, there always has to be one, BUT,

    I liked the idea of making a horror movie like that, it just was done very badley. I did like the B/W stiff, more realism came from that, then the color stiff.

    --Crono/Kyp
    Writer/Director/Producer

    [This message has been edited by Crono/Kyp (edited 10-23-99).]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-23-1999 10:34 AM PT (US)     

     S Smith
    unregistered  

    Crono-

    Thank goodness you finally weighed in. Now I don't have to worry about being the only one that didn't think it was all that.

    And you're right. There's always a butt...er, but.

    Speaking of that, is it true that the newly discovered footage is the long lost porno footage?

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-24-1999 12:10 AM PT (US)     

     Dan Brecher
     Click Here to Email Dan Brecher
     OscarŪ Winner
     

    'The Curse of the Blair Witch' sci-fi channel documentary, which I found to be better then the movie, is on the excellent DVD. Worth a look if you liked the movie.

    Dan (UK)

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-24-1999 08:30 AM PT (US)     

     Crono/Kyp
     Click Here to Email Crono/Kyp
     OscarŪ Winner
     

    The "new stuff" is just them talking in the tent for about 7 or 10 min. Very lame.

    --Crono/Kyp
    Writer/Director/Producer

    NP: To Far Away Times: From "Chrono Trigger" Disk 3 (****1/2/*****)

    [This message has been edited by Crono/Kyp (edited 10-24-99).]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-24-1999 09:59 AM PT (US)     

     Dan Brecher
     Click Here to Email Dan Brecher
     OscarŪ Winner
     

    Yeah, the deleted scene on the disc leaves a lot to be desired. There is a different one on the VHS apparently (the diner scene, oooh spooky! ) and well, there is of course the other 22 hours of unused material.

    Dan (UK)

    NP: Shawshank Redemption (*****)

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-24-1999 05:22 PM PT (US)     

     Scott
     Click Here to Email Scott
     OscarŪ Winner
     

    I would have hoped some of you had a little more imagination than this...

    Just imagine...you in the same position as these guys. Hearing the same sounds, seeing the same things, knowing what they know...Wouldn't YOU be scared? I'm man enough to admit it, it'll be a while till I go camping again (next year )

    Spooky Scotty (Hey, I like that)

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-25-1999 06:00 AM PT (US)     

     SFT
     Click Here to Email SFT
     OscarŪ Winner
     

    I agree with Scott.

    In general (and Iīm not jumping on anyone here) I find, that people who do not see this movie as scary, just donīt understand it.

    Sorry...

    SFT

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-25-1999 01:18 PM PT (US)     

     S Smith
    unregistered  

    Alright, Scott, I'm going to imagine I'm in their situation. First of all, anybody with half a brain (and I should know, because I have one), knows that if you're lost in the woods, follow the freakin' river DOWNSTREAM and sooner you'll run across yet a bigger body of water, and so forth, until eventually you're out.

    Secondly, I'm in a tent, late at night with all kinds of freaky things going on outside my tent. Now, the problem is outside my tent. Why would I leave it and risk getting hurt/killed by whatever is out there? And if I did decide to leave my tent, the absolute last thing on my mind would be to turn on the stupid video camera, add a couple of pounds of weight to my already freaked-out running, and shoot the whole thing. That just made no sense.

    And what the heck was there to understand? Three people lost in woods. Killed by someone/something. Game over.

    I'll concede that it was a good idea, but for me didn't translate well. The true genius of the film is in it's marketing.


    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-25-1999 11:30 PM PT (US)     

     SFT
     Click Here to Email SFT
     OscarŪ Winner
     

    S Smith,

    First of all, I agree that they were stupid in not following the river. However, I know plenty of people who does not know this. In fact, here in Denmark, nobody knows this; unless they are scouts or something along those lines. Could it not be that theses three kids just didīnt know?
    Besides, you never know what kind of stupid things people do when they are lost in the woods. Itīs allways easier to judge someone AFTERWARDS.

    Second, the only time they leave the tent is because some one/something is shaking it! Not to mention that they hear childrens voices all over the place. I would run!
    However I do agree with you that it is pretty lame shooting the intire thing. I would be more concerned with saving my own ass. (Although, again, you never know how people might react in a situation like that).
    If I was the director, I would have done that scene in an intirely different manner. But that doesīnt mean that the idea itself is stupid.

    Personally, I have never seen a movie I thought was scarier than The Blair With Project. I donīt know why but I just do. I mean, when I saw it the first time I thought: "Hmmm...they get lost in the woods...find this old house...and then sometihng or someone kills them, and we donīt even see who it is...so what?!"

    I can understand why some people have that opinion.
    BUT, the case with this movie is the same as with PSYCHO: The REAL horror doesīnt come during the viewing of the film (like Scream and Halloween) but afterwards, when thinking about it.

    You may agree, or disagree, but that is how I feel.

    SFT

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-26-1999 02:51 AM PT (US)     

     Scott
     Click Here to Email Scott
     OscarŪ Winner
     

    SFT,
    well put.

    S Smith,
    good points. Yet I wonder ( I won't cover what SFT so alequently has already covered),would Stephen Spielberg just run and save his behind or would he film everything?
    After all, they were on a mission to discover the secret of The Blair Witch Legend. People do dumb things, look at us, we gave Clinton a second term. Now THAT'S scary

    Scott

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-26-1999 08:02 AM PT (US)     

     S Smith
    unregistered  

    Touche with the Clinton thing. People really do stupid things.

    I'm no psych major, but I really think that regardless of a person's obsession with their project, the "I gotta save myself - screw the project" part of their brain would kick in. If there was something like an earthquake during a recording session, do you really think all of the players/conductor are just going to sit there and keep on playing like nothing is happening?

    And, maybe I didn't quite phrase this right before, but the only time they leave the tent, as SFT said, is when someone/something is shaking it and all. That implies that there is something outside the tent. So why would you go outside where this person/thing is? Granted, it's only a tent and the big bad wolf would be able to blow it down, but, I don't know. To me it makes more sense to stay inside where the person/thing ISN'T, rather than go outside where it IS.

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-26-1999 01:02 PM PT (US)     

     Scott
     Click Here to Email Scott
     OscarŪ Winner
     

    Yeah, I suppose your right. What gets me though, is that we as a society still do the same things. I mean, one of the top rated shows is "Cops". The camera is on ALL the time. In a war we have corrospondents in some of the most dangerous situation in front of the camera giving their report sometimes running away. All for a story. Don't you think among all of us peoples worldwide you could find three persons behaving this way or similarly?

    The tent thing is no less difficult. You've mentioned yourself a tent ain't gonna do much as far as protection is concerned. So would I take the change, not knowing what is out there, and try to run away from whatever? Can't hide or run away in a tent.

    I don't know...best thing is stay together and try to avoid giving in to the fear. After all, in the final analysis, it was their fear that really killed them.

    Just my humble thoughts...

    Scott

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-27-1999 07:45 AM PT (US)     

     S Smith
    unregistered  

    Actually, if you agree with Anthony Hopkins line in "The Edge," what really killed them was shame. You know. "I could have done this" "I should have done that." And then they just sort of remand themselves to death.

    Actually, what really killed them is that they were lead by a woman who didn't know what she was doing. Oops. Did I say that?


    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-27-1999 04:44 PM PT (US)     

     Al
     Click Here to Email Al
     OscarŪ Winner
     

    This is a movie that dares you to use the imagination that the directors did not have. I am only kidding. I know exactly what they were trying to do. You need to put yourself in their shoes. You need to think about how scary it would be if YOU were out there. Hmm...

    Here's an idea. Take some friends. Go camping. Tell scary stories. You probably won't hear children laughing and have an unknown ancient evil scratching at your tent, but it'll be scarier, and more fun, than watching a bunch of actors doing about the same thing.

    [This message has been edited by Al (edited 10-27-99).]

    Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

    posted 10-27-1999 07:18 PM PT (US)     
     

    Old Infopop Software by UBB

    © 1998-2011, The MovieMusic Company